User talk:Bad good dragosh98

buna ...........sunt dragosh si tin foarte mult la echipa mea favorita FC VASLUI........imi place sa caut detalii despre echipa, dar si despre echipa satelit, iar apoi sa le scriu pe wikipedia

Welcome!

 * }

September 2011
Articles speedy-deleted:
 * Robert Aticah
 * Rareş Cucui

Proposed deletion of Mihai Tudor


The article Mihai Tudor has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

"Infobox only" articles
It looks like you have been creating articles about football players with only an infobox, and no actual text. Please don't do that. Please write some text first, and then add the infobox. A Wikipedia article is allowed to have text only and no infobox, but it is not acceptable to have an article that consists of an infobox only and no text. Thank you. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horia Crişan


The article Horia Crişan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marko Campar


The article Marko Campar has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification of discussion at "Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents" about starting "infobox only" articles
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ---Shirt58 (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

A few suggestions
Hello from the other side of the world Bad good dragosh98! Hope this helps. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, so your language is Romanian and you are FC Vaslui fan. Your English is good enough to start articles on en.wikipedia.org, the English language Wikipedia. So, you can read English, and you can read the comments to your contributions.  Reply back in English or Romanian, or whatever language, but please do reply!
 * You've already been notified that starting "info-box only" articles is no good. They will be deleted, unless you include a description of the football player as well as the infobox.
 * Daniel Stana, who plays for Liga I club FC Ceahlăul Piatra Neamț has an article in the English language Wikipedia. There is no Daniel Stana in the Romanian language Wikipedia! I suggest that it might be a good idea for you to start articles on the Romanian language Wikipedia, and then start them on the English language Wikipedia.

Proposed deletion of several articles
Hello Bad good dragosh98, you will no doubt have noticed there has been a lot of action on your talk page recently regarding the Romanian footballer articles that you created. Most if not all of them were nominated for speedy deletion under the criterion that the article did not assert the importance of the subject. Those were incorrect nominations, as the infobox stated that they played professional football, and that in itself is enough to disqualify the articles for speedy deletion. However, you did not add a source to any of the articles, which as of March 28, 2011, is required for all articles about living people (per the standing policy). Consequently, the articles are eligable for deletion via a different process, one which is known as WP:BLPPROD. The articles are proposed for deletion, and will be deleted after 10 days unless one reliable source is added to them. I have listed the articles below in an easier to use format than the multiple deletion templates that had been left automatically by Twinkle. My suggestion is that you go through the articles, add a source, and preferably a breif description (as advised above), and remove the PROD template (you are permitted to remove the template onece the article has one reliable source). In the future I suggest two things, either you create the article to meet the criteria of BLPPROD from the start, or you start the articles in user subpages first, and then move them to article space when they are ready. If you need any assistance with this, let me know, and I will be glad to help. --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hope this list helps. --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Alexandru Barna: BLP PROD; notified  13:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Alexandru Grigoraş: BLP PROD; notified  13:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Alexandru Buhuşi: BLP PROD; notified  13:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Alexandru Hărăguţă: BLP PROD; notified  13:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Alexandru Ologu: BLP PROD; notified  13:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Alin Goia: BLP PROD; notified  13:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Andrei Ţepeş: BLP PROD; notified  13:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Andrei Pavel (footballer): BLP PROD; notified  14:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) Amet Enghin: BLP PROD; notified  14:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Bojan Jović: BLP PROD; notified  14:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Daniel Unguru: BLP PROD; notified  14:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Diego Marder: BLP PROD; notified  14:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) Dragoş Balauru: BLP PROD; notified  14:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) Hélder Manuel Teles Godinho: BLP PROD; notified  14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) George Gavrilaş: BLP PROD; notified  14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) Enghin Amet: BLP PROD; notified  14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) Igor Radovanović: BLP PROD; notified  14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) Ionuţ Tătaru: BLP PROD; notified  14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) Lorand Szilagyi: BLP PROD; notified  14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) Lucas Gabriel López García: BLP PROD; notified  14:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) Victoraş Cataramă: BLP PROD; notified  14:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) Victoraş Astafei: BLP PROD; notified  14:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) Mihai Roman (footballer born 1992): BLP PROD; notified  14:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) Matheus Eccard: BLP PROD; notified  14:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) Salifou Fofana: BLP PROD; notified  14:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) Emanuel Creţulescu
 * 27) Eduardo Schroder Brock

Salut
Pustiu, observ ca ai 13 ani, si hai sa iti explic cate ceva despre Wikipedia. Tu esti un utilizator nou, care a descoperit acest site in urma cu maxim o luna, doua. Nu poti crea articole despre o persoana, fara sa dai o sursa despre existenta acelei persoane. Asta ca sa intelegi de ce ti-au fost sterse paginile create. Totodata, presupun ca tu esti copilul care tot edita orice stire aparuta in ziarele noastre idioate, pe acest site. Din cauza ta, am fost nevoit sa apelez la administratorii site-ului, si sa protejez aceasta pagina. Ca un avertisment, in caz ca vei continua sa contribui cu informatii false, iti voi face raport la administratorii site-ului, sa-ti fie restrictionat accesul. Ia si traieste-ti copilaria, si lasa Wikipedia, pentru cei care au experienta in domeniu. Alexynho (talk) 16:55, 6 September (EET)
 * Thank you, Alexynho, there's some very good advice there, especially for a younger Wikipedia editor. But those threats? You are not a sysop on en.wp.  Are you an admin on ro.wp?  Even if you are, please do be careful what you say.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bogdan Rusu


The article Bogdan Rusu has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GiantSnowman 14:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''It is not clear what your sources are for the material you keep adding to articles including FC Vaslui, but you really have to stop. Such unexplained and unverified edits are disruptive. Moreover, you have never responded to any of the remarks made by a number of editors, and that is unhelpful as well. If you persist in adding unverified information, you may be blocked from editing, perhaps even indefinitely.'' Drmies (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Horia Crişan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horia Crişan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Horia Crişan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 16:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marko Campar


The article Marko Campar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fail WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mihai Luca.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mihai Luca.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CSMS Iasi.png


A tag has been placed on File:CSMS Iasi.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop
I request that you stop adding pp-template and categories that are for templates only to articles. An example of what I mean is this edit. Thank you. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 13:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at FC Vaslui, you may be blocked from editing. This is only one of many unexplained and unsourced edits, rising to the level of disruption. Drmies (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amet Enghin


A tag has been placed on Amet Enghin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Hritcu


A tag has been placed on Daniel Hritcu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sergiu Negruţ


The article Sergiu Negruţ has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Stana


The article Daniel Stana has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hélder Godinho


The article Hélder Godinho has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alin Gligor


A tag has been placed on Alin Gligor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 20:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bojan Jović


The article Bojan Jović has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 22:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Victor Astafei has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Luk  talk 10:10, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Please start articles for Romanian footballers on the Romanian language Wikipedia before starting them on the English language Wikipedia
Hi, Bad good dragosh98. I have suggested this before, but I am saying this again.

Please start articles for Romanian footballers on the Romanian language Wikipedia before starting them on the English language Wikipedia. Have a look at at this, your own talk-page, and see how many of the articles you started about Romanian footballers that have been deleted. Almost all of them didn't have a Romanian language Wikipedia articles.

To summarise: please, please do start articles for Romanian footballers on the Romanian language Wikipedia before starting them on the English language Wikipedia! --Shirt58 (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Horia Crişan
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alin Goia


The article Alin Goia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amet Enghin


The article Amet Enghin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alin Gligor


The article Alin Gligor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

PROD Protocols
When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, as you did with Alin Goia, Alin Gligor, and Amet Enghin, please state your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Notability
First of all, let me appoligise if I've come across as harsh and inflexible with regards to your recent edits, and articles you created. The problem here is that Wikipedia has very clear criteria as to which subjects should have articles and which subjects shouldn't. This is called notability and is one of the most fundemental principles of Wikipedia. The general notability guideline states that any subject which has received significant coverage in in reliable, independant sources is considered notable and may have a Wikipedia article. There are also topic specific notability guidelines. The notability guideline for football says that any player who has played in a fully professional league, or for his/her country's national team is notable. In the case of Romania, this means that any footballer who has played in Liga I, or in a Cupa României or a Supercupa României match between two Liga I teams is notable. Liga II players and players contracted to Liga I clubs but who have not played any matches for them are usually not notable. Please try to respect these guidelines. I hope this helps explain why so many articles you created have been proposed or nominated for deletion. Best Regards. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please stop with the edit warring on the article FC Brașov. The reasons why your edits were reverted were explained both in the edit summaries and on the talk page. If you have a different opinion on them please express it there, or else accept the revision I proposed. BaboneCar (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ionut Jitaru. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Vasile Curileac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasile Curileac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vasile Curileac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 07:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. As stated above, removing afd tags from articles nominated for deletion is highly disruptive, as it makes participation in the discussion by interested parties more difficult. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proposed deletion of Răzvan Atudorei


The article Răzvan Atudorei has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dan Vascan


The article Dan Vascan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edits...
...are again being discussed, this time on the talk page of WP:FOOTY. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football. Feel free to weigh in: your future at Wikipedia may be at stake. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Vasvari


The article Gabriel Vasvari has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stefan Liutec


The article Stefan Liutec has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexandru Vrabie


The article Alexandru Vrabie has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ciprian Dinu


The article Ciprian Dinu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tudor Homneac


The article Tudor Homneac has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Vascan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Vascan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dan Vascan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Usage of Navbox template
Hi. In your articles, when you add the navbox template "FC Botoşani squad" it is not necessary and out of standars to copy in each page all its source code. The correct usage of it is to place simply FC Botoşani squad, and the template will appair. For further infos about the manual of style could be helpful the pages WP:MOS and WP:MOSBIO. Good work and regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring again
The vice-captain thing is unnecessary in the FC Brașov article and you should read the article about Emanuel Creţulescu to see he's in the under-19 squad. Your edits have previously been reverted by User:Sir Sputnik:. Please stop the edit warring. BaboneCar (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Mesaje în pagina de discuţii
Am fost rugat să iau legătura cu tine deoarece ai primit foarte multe mesaje aici în pagina ta de discuţii, dar le-ai ignorat pe toate, iar alţi utilizatori cu care te-ai intersectat au început să se întrebe dacă înţelegi limba engleză. Cel mai important aspect pe care trebuie să-l înţelegi este că Wikipedia este o enciclopedie, şi deci trebuie să îşi limiteze cât de cât subiectele despre care scrie. Aici, limitarea este la subiecte acoperite în detaliu de surse de încredere din domeniul lor. În cazul fotbaliştilor, există un criteriu general care spune că doar fotbaliştii care au jucat într-o ligă complet profesionistă sunt notabili; în România, singura astfel de ligă este Liga I. Cei care au jucat doar cel mult în liga a II-a românească nu sunt notabili.

Trebuie să îţi atrag atenţia că, dacă alţii îşi exprimă îngrijorarea cu privire la conţinutul unui articol propunându-l pentru ştergere, eliminarea etichetei nu va rezolva problema. Citeşte îndrumările spre care eşti direcţionat, conţin multe informaţii utile. Iar când cineva îţi scrie în pagina de discuţii, frumos ar fi să-i răspunzi, pentru că dacă tu continui să-i ignori, ei vor considera că tu ai un comportament perturbant şi vei ajunge să fii blocat. Atunci, chiar nimeni nu va avea nimic de câştigat.

Te salut, în speranţa că vei înţelege cum să contribui la Wikipedia şi că vei produce conţinut de calitate.- Andrei (talk) 15:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mihai Bordeianu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STOP removing AfD templates. Drmies (talk) 20:38, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Liga II players
Please note that I have added the above six players which you removed the PROD notices from, to Articles for deletion/Dan Vascan. Please note that you are not allowed to remove AfD notices from articles, and should comment at the related discussion. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 20:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:ANI
For disruptive editing and failure to communicate, I have been forced to initiate an administrative investigation into your editing. I highly suggest you begin to take notice of what is being posted to your talk page, and collaberate with the community or will be blocked from editting. Best Regards. Translated via google translate: Pentru editarea perturbator şi eşecul de a comunica, am fost obligat să iniţieze o anchetă administrativă în editare. Am foarte sugerăm să vă începe să ia cunoştinţă de ceea ce este postat pe pagina de discuţie dvs., şi collaberate cu comunitatea sau va fi blocat de la editting. Salutari. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. causa sui (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Dragosh. I am writing this note to add some extra explanation about why you are blocked from editing. You have broken many of the editing guidelines and policies, many times, and you have ignored people when they have tried to tell you about this. It has also been suggested that, at the moment, you do not understand English well enough to contribute here. If Romanian is your best language, then it would be better for you to write information about football on the Romanian Wikipedia. But remember that there will be rules there too. If your understanding of English is better in one year from now, then that would be a good time to edit articles here on the English Wikipedia again. Please do not try to edit with a different account before you are unblocked, because that will be discovered quickly, and then you will be blocked for longer. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Salut Dragosh. Iti scriu acest mesaj, pentru a-ti oferi explicatii de ce ai fost blocat de la editare. Ai incalcat multe reguli, de nenumarate ori si ai ignorat persoanele care au incercat sa te informeze in legatura acest aspect. Totodata, s-a sugerat ca, in acest moment, nu cunosti limba engleza, la un nivel incat sa poti contribui cu succes pe acest site. Daca romana este limba ta de baza, cel mai bine ar fi sa scrii informatii pe Wikipedia in romana. Dar retine, ca sunt reguli si acolo. Daca engleza ta va fi imbunatatita peste un an, atunci vei putea edita articole pe Wikipedia in engleza, din nou. Te rugam sa nu folosesti un alt cont, inainte de a fi deblocat, deoarece vei fi descoperit imediat, si vei fi sanctionat pe o perioada mai lunga de timp. Alexynho (talk) 16:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Bad good dragosh98 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)