User talk:Badanagram/Archive 1

I made this! Pigeonshouse 21:29, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Connie Fisher
Absolutely, which is why I deleted it: that's a text-book case of copyright violation. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 21:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I wasn't meaning to accuse you of copying it, but was that necessary to remove my edit?
 * Your edit replaced the copied text, duplicating information which had already been listed earlier in the article. So there were two reasons I removed it. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 22:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Boooooooooring immature can't be bothered to dignify with proper response Pigeonshouse 22:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Susan Mills
Please help me understand why you are redirecting Susan Mills to Scott Mills. Kuk i ni  háblame aquí 19:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I was drunk and I thought it was funny..... I'm glad I'm not a full time editor of Wikipedia, i think the stress of being so uptight would lead me to an early grave Pigeonshouse (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucy Mangan
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lucy Mangan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Spiesr (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I made this! Pigeonshouse 21:29, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Lucy Mangan
Hello Pigeonshouse, I am a Proposed Deletion Patroller and I noticed that the proposed deletion of Lucy Mangan was about to expire. The article was going to be deleted because she is not "notable" enough, however it's clear that she is regularly published in a major newspaper so I deleted the proposal. Just to let you know, according to the policy regarding proposed deletions, they can only be deleted if the deletion is non-controversial. That means that if someone wants to delete an article, and you don't think it should be deleted, it is automatically ineligible. All you have to do is edit the article, delete the tag that was added, and you should explain in the edit summary why you don't want it deleted. If you do this, any further attempts to delete the article are deemed controversial because someone (you) object to it, and the only way to delete it is through a formal process where you can defend the article's value.

Now, the article does need work so if you do have interest in this subject I encourage you to add more content to it. I have added a tag myself requesting that it be expanded which might help the article get attention. But I just wanted to leave you a message, letting you know not to give up on articles you want to see created, there are other editors who will support you if your article has merit. --  At am a chat 18:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will have a go, but this person is quite enigmatic! To create a suitable article will take a lot of research and learning more about proper wikipedia editing.