User talk:Badanaroniowais

March 2014
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jaan (film) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ajay Devgan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ajay Devgan was changed by Badanaroniowais (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968954 on 2014-03-06T15:02:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jaan (film), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jaan (film) was changed by Badanaroniowais (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970665 on 2014-03-06T15:50:50+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kupwara, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roni Owais


A tag has been placed on Roni Owais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that you meet the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  20:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roni owais


A tag has been placed on Roni owais, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 14:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 17:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)