User talk:Badol1234

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Badol1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Badol1234/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Badol1234/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Badol1234/sandbox


Hello, Badol1234. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

SABNAM PERVIN(ACTRESS)
Sabnam Pervin is a Bangladeshi Famous Actress. She start her acting carier in the Movie since 1985. Her 1st movie name was" AGUN PANI(1985) . But before she strat her film carier she used to be perfrom in the stage Drama. In 1982 she 1st acted a tv Drama which Name was . Badol1234 (talk) 09:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tondra Islam


The article Tondra Islam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 04:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MOONMOON


The article MOONMOON has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 04:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tondra Islam


A tag has been placed on Tondra Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

List entries
Your recent edit to List of Bangladeshi actors appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunetra(Actress)
Hello Badol1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sunetra(Actress) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 12:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Badol1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabnam Pervin(Actress)


A tag has been placed on Sabnam Pervin(Actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David. moreno 72   11:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FB IMG 1476626980885.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:FB IMG 1476626980885.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunetra (actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunetra (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sunetra (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of MOONMOON for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MOONMOON is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MOONMOON until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FB IMG 1477219344924.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FB IMG 1477219344924.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Where to edit
Hello, Badol1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with ; did you know there is a Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! – Fayenatic  L ondon 17:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FB IMG 1477211386228.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:FB IMG 1477211386228.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with MOONMOON. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 19:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to MOONMOON, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabnam Pervin(Actress)
Hello Badol1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sabnam Pervin(Actress) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  03:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because...

This is not facek. she is one of Famous Actress in Bangladesh.She is my relatives and asked me to help her to open an article about her in wikipedia. Thats why i am doing it. and she provinding me the all information about her.

--Badol1234 (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Badol1234, that is not sufficient. To create articles in Wikipedia, you must base your information on independent published sources. See the guidance at WP:Identifying reliable sources.
 * This page which you cited only mentions her name, but gives no other information.
 * No doubt you mean well, but badly-written pages on the Internet do not mean that your relatives will be more respected in the world. Please consider all the advice above before creating any more pages. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest with respect to Sabnam Pervin
Hello, Badol1234. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Sabnam Pervin(Actress), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moonmoon(Bangladeshi Actress)


The article Moonmoon(Bangladeshi Actress) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FB IMG 1477211386228.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FB IMG 1477211386228.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sunetra (actress). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Also, nobody owns Wikipedia or its articles -- that includes you. Kind regards, '' —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 13:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunetra (actress), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Melbourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b> ☆ <sup style="color:#407">talk 13:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:MBisanz. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 14:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:FB IMG Sabnam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FB IMG Sabnam.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Moonmoon


A tag has been placed on Moonmoon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:SABNAM PERVIN(ACTRESS)
Draft:SABNAM PERVIN(ACTRESS), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:SABNAM PERVIN(ACTRESS) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:SABNAM PERVIN(ACTRESS) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Help:Using talk pages. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 12:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

General problematic editing; a Final warning
Hi Badol1234. Some editors have expressed concern over your editing for a few reasons. The crux is that it seems to be at this point a time drain on community resources with quite a net negative effect — by not following our policies and guidelines, not attempting to understand them, after being informed about relevant ones, not acknowledging and flouting the consensus result of discussions by recreating deleted content, and generally not editing in a competent manner. This may or may not be the result of a language barrier, but nevertheless, significant time of multiple editors continues to be used to address your edits. In the beginning we give editors some leeway. We were all beginners once. It is not fine to repeat the same behaviors after being told about the problems with them. That is, what could be viewed as good faith errors at the start, may be transformed into tendentious editing if the person is informed but continues.


 * Your edits as to the now deleted article on Moonmoon are illustrative of some of these issues:


 * On October 19, 2016, you created MOONMOON, which does not meet our policies and guidelines. For example, the subject appears non-notable – as we use that concept here to require that topics of articles be the subject of significant coverage in reliable, secondary and independent sources; the article was written in broken English, was unsourced and yet on a Biography of a living person where excellent sourcing is required, and so forth.
 * This article was considered for deletion at this articles for deletion discussion, which you were specifically informed about on your talk page; and
 * Which you also seemed to know about since you removed the AfD template from the page which you are not allowed to do (as well as maintenance tags added to the article, without addressing any of the concerns expressed in them), which removals you were also warned about.
 * On November 2, 2016, you recreated an article on this at Moonmoon (originally under the title Moonmoon(Bangladeshi Actress)), ignoring the result of the above deletion discussion, and with essentially the same content (and so it was speedy deleted under CSD G4).

Okay, so that could have been a learning experience. No problem, make your next effort better. But that's not what we see. Almost every edit you have made to Wikipedia has had to be reverted or deleted. Some seem in apparent good faith, others not, but the common thread is a lack of understanding of appropriate editing, no apparent effort to try to understand appropriate editing or heed past warnings – by repeating the same problematic edits afterwards, and competence does appear to be an issue. Other examples:
 * Creating another article on a non-notable subject that required community time to consider for deletion, at Articles for deletion/Sunetra (actress).
 * Blanking the above articles for deletion debate in this diff.
 * Apparently attempting to comment on that discussion, but somehow doing so irrelevantly at Help:Using talk pages in this diff.
 * Asking for the above article not to be deleted at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion (which is not at all what that page can be used for).
 * Adding the text of an article to Talk:Login, for reasons that are mysterious.
 * Changing the page Article wizard/Subject, to contain the content of an article in this edit
 * Adding unsourced content to multiple articles, all of them being biographies of living persons, where, as I indicated before, unsourced additions are especially problematic. These contributions are also in broken English, which is a problem at a writing project. Users who cannot contribute well in English can sometimes make highly useful contributions by limiting their edits to matters that don’t require English skills. Not recognizing those limits is also a competence issue.
 * Changing another person’s post at your talk page (which broke all the links you edited).
 * Using your user page to store content created elsewhere (now deleted under CSD U5).
 * Creating other pages like Tondra Islam, without usable content.
 * Cutting and pasting a draft’s contents to the mainspace, rather than using the move function, thereby creating a potential copyright problem (since the draft had edits by other users), which is now being considered for deletion at MfD where more editors' time is involved.
 * Uploading images without any attempt to meet copyright requirements, and which all seem to be copyright violations—doing so after receiving prior warnings about similar images.
 * Making the nasty, uncivil post at this diff.

I could go on, but I think that is sufficient to lay out the issue. In sum, after a deep dive into your edits, I cannot find really any that are not problematic, and have not required other users to use their time to deal with them. For these reasons, I am asking you to limit your edits to clearly positive contributions, that you are able to make given you’re limited ability to speak and understand English, and that you do your best to understand our policies and guidelines in your future edits. I am also posting this as a final warning. Enough time has been wasted by enough people. If you make further problematic edits, you may be indefinitely blocked from further editing.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have provided a machine translation below in what I think is your native language. They are notoriously bad but maybe it will help.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

সাধারণ সমস্যাযুক্ত সম্পাদনা; একটি চূড়ান্ত সতর্কবার্তা
হাই Badol1234. কিছু সম্পাদকদের কয়েকটি কারণে আপনার এডিটিং নিয়ে উদ্বেগ প্রকাশ করেছেন. সংশ্লিষ্ট ব্যক্তিদের সম্পর্কে অবহিত করা হচ্ছে আমাদের নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশাবলী নিম্নলিখিত না, তাদের বোঝার প্রয়াস না পরে দ্বারা স্বীকার না এবং প্রতি অবজ্ঞা দেখিয়েই - জটিল যে এটা এই বিন্দু বেশ একটি নেট নেতিবাচক প্রভাব সঙ্গে সম্প্রদায়ের সম্পদের উপর একটি সময় ড্রেন হতে মনে হয় দ্বারা আলোচনাও ঐক্যমত্য ফলাফলের মোছা recreating বিষয়বস্তু, এবং সাধারণত একটি উপযুক্ত পদ্ধতিতে সম্পাদন করা. এই বা একটি ভাষা বাধা ফল হতে পারে, কিন্তু তা সত্ত্বেও, একাধিক সম্পাদকদের উল্লেখযোগ্য সময় আপনার সম্পাদনাগুলি সুরাহা করার জন্য ব্যবহার করা অব্যাহত.

শুরুতে আমরা সম্পাদকদের কিছু অতি সামান্য বিচ্যুতি দিতে. আমরা সব নতুনদের একবার ছিল. এটা তাদের সমস্যা সম্পর্কে বলা হচ্ছে পরে একই আচরণ পুনরাবৃত্তি জরিমানা নয়. যে কি হিসাবে শুরুতে সদ্ভাবপূর্ণ ত্রুটি, উদ্দেশ্যমূলক সম্পাদনার মধ্যে যদি ব্যক্তি অবগত কিন্তু চলতে হয় রুপান্তরিত করা যেতে পারে দেখা হতে পারে, হয়.

মুনমুন এখন মুছে ফেলা নিবন্ধটি যেমন আপনার সম্পাদনাগুলি এই বিষয় কিছু অর্থবোধক হয়:


 * 19 অক্টোবর, 2016 তারিখে, আপনি মুনমুন, যা আমাদের নীতি ও নির্দেশিকা মেনে চলছে না সৃষ্টি করেছেন. উদাহরণস্বরূপ ইতস্তত, বিষয় অ উল্লেখযোগ্য হচ্ছে, - যেমন আমরা যে এখানে ধারণা প্রয়োজন, যে প্রবন্ধ বিষয়, নির্ভরযোগ্য মাধ্যমিক ও স্বাধীন সূত্র উল্লেখযোগ্য কভারেজ বিষয় হতে ব্যবহার; নিবন্ধটি ভাঙা ইংরেজিতে লেখা হয়েছিল, একটি জীবন্ত ব্যক্তি যেখানে চমৎকার গুন প্রয়োজন বোধ করা হয়, এবং তাই ঘোষণা একটি জীবনী উপর unsourced এবং এখনো ছিল.
 * এই নিবন্ধটি মুছে ফেলার আলোচনা, যা আপনি নির্দিষ্টভাবে আপনার আলাপ পাতায় সম্পর্কে অবগত করা হয়েছে এই নিবন্ধে এ অপসারণের জন্য বিবেচনা করা হত; এবং
 * কোনটি আপনার কাছে সম্পর্কে যেহেতু আপনি পৃষ্ঠা যা করতে অনুমতি দেওয়া হয় না থেকে এএফডি টেমপ্লেট মুছে (সেইসাথে রক্ষণাবেক্ষণ ট্যাগ নিবন্ধ যোগ করা, উদ্বেগ তাদের প্রকাশ কোনো অ্যাড্রেসিং ছাড়া), যা সরানো আপনি ছিলেন জানি লাগে সম্পর্কে সতর্ক.
 * নভেম্বর 2, 2016 উপর, আপনি মুনমুন (মূলত শিরোনাম মুনমুন (বাংলাদেশী অভিনেত্রী) অধীনে) এ এই একটি নিবন্ধ recreated, উপরে অপসারণের আলোচনার ফলাফলের উপেক্ষা, এবং মূলত একই বিষয়বস্তু সঙ্গে (এবং তাই এটি দ্রুত সিএসডি অধীনে মোছা হয়েছে G4).

ঠিক আছে, যাতে একটি শেখার অভিজ্ঞতা থাকতে পারে. কোন সমস্যা নেই, আপনার পরবর্তী প্রচেষ্টা ভাল করতে. কিন্তু যে; না গুলি আমরা কি দেখতে. প্রায় প্রতিটি সম্পাদনার আপনি Wikipedi করেছেন প্রতিস্থাপন রোধ বা মুছে ফেলা হবে ফেলেছে. কিছু আপাত সরল বিশ্বাসে না বলে মনে হচ্ছে, অন্যদের, কিন্তু সাধারণ থ্রেড উপযুক্ত এডিটিং এর বোঝার অভাব হয়, উপযুক্ত এডিটিং বুঝতে বা অতীত সতর্কবার্তা মনোযোগ দেওয়ার জন্য কোন আপাত প্রচেষ্টা চেষ্টা - পরবর্তীতে একই সমস্যাযুক্ত সম্পাদনাগুলি পুনরায় ব্যবহার করে, এবং কর্মদক্ষতা দেখা দিতে পারে একটা ইস্যু করা. অন্যান্য উদাহরণ:


 * উইকিপিডিয়ায় যে সম্প্রদায় সময় প্রয়োজন অপসারণের জন্য বিবেচনা করার জন্য একটি অ উল্লেখযোগ্য বিষয় উপর আরেকটি নিবন্ধে, তৈরি করা হচ্ছে: মুছে ফেলার জন্য প্রবন্ধ / সুনেত্র (অভিনেত্রী).
 * এই ফারাক অপসারণের বিতর্ক জন্য উপরে নিবন্ধ blanking.
 * দৃশ্যত যে আলোচনার মন্তব্য করতে প্রয়াস, কিন্তু একরকম সহায়তা তাই অপ্রাসঙ্গিকভাবে করছেন: এই ফারাক আলাপ পাতায় ব্যবহার.
 * উপরে নিবন্ধ উইকিপিডিয়ায় না মুছে ফেলা হবে চাওয়া: মুছে না ফেলা জন্য অনুরোধ (যা এ সব কি যে পৃষ্ঠার জন্য ব্যবহার করা যেতে পারে না).
 * লগইন, যে কারণে রহস্যময় জন্য: টক নিবন্ধের টেক্সট যোগ করার পদ্ধতি.
 * পাতা উইকিপিডিয়া পরিবর্তন: নিবন্ধ উইজার্ড / সাপেক্ষে এই সম্পাদনাটি একটি নিবন্ধের বিষয়বস্তু ধারণ করে
 * একাধিক নিবন্ধে unsourced বিষয়বস্তু যোগ করার পদ্ধতি, তাদের হচ্ছে জীবিত ব্যক্তির, যেখানে যেমন আমি আগে নির্দেশিত জীবনী সব, unsourced সংযোজন বিশেষত সমস্যাযুক্ত হয়. এইসব অবদান ভাঙা ইংরেজি, যা একটি লিখিত প্রকল্প এ একটা সমস্যা রয়েছে. ব্যবহারকারীরা যারা কখনো ইংরেজিতে ভাল অবদান রাখতে পারেন যে বিষয়ে ইংরেজীতে দক্ষতা প্রয়োজন হয় না তাদের সম্পাদনাগুলি সীমিত দ্বারা অত্যন্ত দরকারী অবদান করতে পারেন. সেই সীমা স্বীকৃতি না একটি কর্মদক্ষতা ইস্যু.
 * আপনার আলাপ পাতায় আরেকটি ব্যক্তির পোস্টে পরিবর্তন (যা সমস্ত লিঙ্কের আপনি সম্পাদিত কপর্দকশূন্য).
 * আপনার ব্যবহারকারী পাতা ব্যবহার অন্যত্র নির্মিত বিষয়বস্তু (এখন সিএসডি U5 অধীনে মুছে ফেলা হয়েছে) সংরক্ষন করে রাখি.
 * Tondra ইসলামের মত অন্যান্য পাতায়, ব্যবহারযোগ্য সামগ্রী ছাড়া তৈরি.
 * mainspace থেকে কাটা এবং পেস্ট একটি খসড়া এর বিষয়বস্তু, বদলে সরানো ফাংশন ব্যবহার করে, যার ফলে একটি সম্ভাব্য কপিরাইট সমস্যা তৈরি (যেহেতু খসড়া অন্যান্য ব্যবহারকারীদের দ্বারা সম্পাদনাগুলি ছিল), যা এখন বিজ্ঞাপন MfD যেখানে আরো এডিটরস সময় জড়িত হয়.
 * কপিরাইট প্রয়োজনীয়তা পূরণ করার চেষ্টা, এবং যা সমস্ত কপিরাইট লঙ্ঘনের হবে বলে মনে হচ্ছে ছাড়াই ইমেজ আপলোড করা হচ্ছে.
 * এই ফারাক এ কদর্য, অভদ্র পোস্টে মেকিং.

আমি যেতে পারে, কিন্তু আমি মনে করি যে ইস্যু খুঁজে রাখা যথেষ্ট. সংক্ষেপে, আপনার সম্পাদনাগুলি মধ্যে একটি গভীর ডুব পর, আমি সত্যিই কোন যে সমস্যাযুক্ত না হয়, এবং তাদের সঙ্গে মোকাবেলা করতে তাদের সময় ব্যবহার করার জন্য অন্যান্য ব্যবহারকারীদের প্রয়োজনীয় নি খুঁজে পেতে পারেন. এই কারণে, আমি আপনার সম্পাদনাগুলি পরিষ্কারভাবে ইতিবাচক অবদান সীমাবদ্ধ করার যে আপনি প্রদত্ত আপনি কথা বলতে এবং ইংরেজি বুঝতে সীমিত ক্ষমতা করছি করতে সক্ষম হয়, এবং আপনি আপনার ভবিষ্যতে আমাদের নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশাবলী বুঝতে করার জন্য যথাসাধ্য যে আপনাকে জিজ্ঞাসা করছি সম্পাদনাগুলি. আমিও একটা চূড়ান্ত সতর্কবাণী হিসাবে এই পোস্ট করছি. যথেষ্ট যথেষ্ট সময় মানুষ নষ্ট হয়েছে. আপনি আরও সমস্যাযুক্ত সম্পাদনা করতে পারেন, আপনি করতে অনির্দিষ্টকালের আরও এডিটিং থেকে ব্লক করা.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sabnam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sabnam.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 18:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Sabnam Parvin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sabnam Parvin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Claim that Sabnam Parvin won awards
Hi, you claimed in the article Sabnam Parvin that she had won "a number" of awards, including a National Film Award for Best Supporting Actress. However, you did not provide any citation for this. I have therefore removed this claim. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Badol1234/sandbox


Hello, Badol1234. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 13:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)