User talk:Badrelmers



-

Welcome
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! RacconishTk 17:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

June 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Adam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Adam. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Myth
Did you read this? Doug Weller talk 05:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes and I agree that it is not a clear word today, and it loses there meaning of truth in a secular wiki :) Badrelmers (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam. Theroadislong (talk) 07:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Do not vandalize please, and explain why you want to force you christian point of view of Adam instead of the truth. If you are sure that Adam is like what Michelangelo drawn then gave your source instead of vandalizing without even explain why you vandalize Badrelmers (talk) 07:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  08:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks! yes you made a mistake when you deleted everything, you have to discuss point by point and I will be happy to answer you, you have to tell me witch part you find it need a source. thanks Badrelmers (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Adam
Hello Badrelmers. Instead of telling other editors that they were mistaken in reverting your changes and that they should discuss each point before reverting, it may be best to open a public discussion at Talk:Adam and to discuss the changes you would like to make and justify them. I also recommend making few changes at a time rather than many changes at once, which are more likely to completely be reverted together. Please see WP:CONSENSUS, WP:BRD and WP:ONUS for more information. I currently see no ongoing discussion on that talk page, despite your multiple unsuccessful attempts to edit the article. Thank you, — Paleo Neonate  - 09:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, It is not me who added all that information, me I added small things the other part there was a lot of users who contributed and in one day some one come and delete this big part then I recover it. and this is very clear if you follow the the edit changes. Badrelmers (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 09:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. only (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)