User talk:Badud

Battle of Klushino
I have reverted your edits there. The numbers cited are referenced. You are adding unreferenced numbers instead. Please don't do so. If you have a source citing a different range, you can add it in addition, properly citing it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I have reverted you once again. See here for rationale. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 19:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Battle of Jordanów
Please don't add opinions about battle outcome without providing scholar references.

Please get yourself familiar with basic rules of wikipedia about article content and editing. Yyu may want to start with reading WP:CITE and related policies.. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Warning
ATTENTION Please don't revert iother people without discussion, YOu will be blocked from editing. Pease see WP:3RR. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Your recent editing history at Battle of Klushino shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

AN/I notification
Please see the thread here. Thank you. Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 20:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I have deleted your userpage. Please read WP:Userpages. Ethnic and political slurs are unrelated to the encyclopedia and you should keep them to yourself. Please do not recreate such statements, neither in your userspace nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You've re-added it ... oh the irony: a "man of honour" would never say or print such a thing. As you have re-added, I have advised WP:ANI - you should probably read there and find out more  dangerous  panda  08:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Enough is enough
You have been blocked from editing indefinitely. To be unblocked, you will need to convince an admin that you are not going to continue edit warring; that you are going to participate in discussions on the talk page; and that you are going to stop with the nationalistic stridency on your talk page. If you feel you can't do this, then please find another website. Standard block template is below. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.