User talk:Baffle gab1978/Archives/2012

Previous discussions are available at: User talk:Baffle gab1978/Archives/November 2011 - March 2012

Thanks!
Thank you for copy-editing "Dreamland." I appreciate that!--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, happy to help. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 10:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Will you...
... please copy-edit an article if I request only you and no one else? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 11:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Jivesh, alas but no; I'll be taking a few weeks' break from copy-editing once I've done what's on my current list. This isn't connected to the conversation we just had. I'm working on getting Blake's 7 to GA status, or at least close, and RL is getting a little busier. Don't worry though I'll probably re-open my c/e list in six weeks or so. Cheers, and happy editing. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. It does not matter. I am used to you telling me that you have to take a break. Lol. I am joking. Thanks and happy editing. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Wow, even her butt is inspiring names now. :P Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That was very nice of you. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Peer review
Hello, sorry for the late reply. Exams starting yesterday, so I've been pretty tied up with them. I will either comment on the PR today or tomorrow. Best, — Status  &#x7B;talk contribs 11:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks and no worries, I've still some suggested tidying to do on the article. Your exams must come first, I hope all goes well for you. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Peer review limits changed
This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.

While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.

If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Reviewing Good article process
Hi Baffle. I noticed you commented on the GA review of Flip Burger Boutique. Good articles are run a bit differently than most other processes here in that an individual editor gets to decide if an article meets its standards. This keeps it a lightweight process and WP:GAR exists if there are any disagreements with a particular article. If you want you could conduct the whole review yourself and fail it (I have not read the article but from your comment it might fail the neutrality criteria at WP:GACR). It might even meet the quickfail requirements. If you don't want to conduct the review yourself then it is probably a better idea to move your criticism to the talk page and delete the review page. It presently looks like you have started the review (see WP:GAN) and other editors will be unlikely to take it up. A good reviewer should check the talk page anyway and if for some reason they do pass it you can still take it to WP:GAR. Let me know if you have anymore questions. AIR corn (talk) 05:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Aircorn, thank you; it's good of you to pop over and post some information about the GA review process, which I haven't really dealt with before in detail. I'll have another look at the article; I haven't done a GA review before so I was uncertain of the procedure involved. I'll take a look at the 'quickfail' requirements and probably will use that. BTW it's currently at AfD, so it's certainly not ready for GA. Thanks again :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks good so far. If you have any questions about reviewing you can ask me or drop a line on the WT:GAN page. AIR corn (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, :-) The article has been heavily edited by others, and the creator/nominator says s/he wants to improve it, so I'll revisit it at the weekend. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One
I just noticed the work you were doing on the copy-editing requirement of this article. I just want to say a big Thank You from my side; you have no idea how much you have improved the article. I fixed a few spelling errors and a blunder in the plot, but otherwise its great. You must have great patience to carry out such a tedious task as copy-editing, but please continue doing so whenever you have the time. The article is currently hopeful of going or a FAR, so we require all the help we can get. Once again, many thanks and keep up the great work. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Ankitbhatt, thank you :-) There are a few odd sentences that don't make sense, I'll need to check references for those. Feel free to correct any further errors I've made - I'll continue the copy-edit later, happy to help. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure thing; anything amiss in the article, feel free to point it out. Though combing through the references will be one hard job as there are 190 of them :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ooh, that should be fun then :-) There may be some repeated references, as news agency articles are often carried by many media, so we might be able to reduce these to more sensible proportions. I'll let you know if I find anything that can be eliminated. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you clarify "During this event, a 3600 ft long fan mail collecting audience wishes and messages for the film was also launched.[54]" please? i find this sentence ungrammatical and I've checked | the source and it doesn't explain what a 'fan mail' is - is it a single item or a collection of items? On reflection I suspect it might be singular, can we say 'fan letter' / 'letter from fans' here? Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Going through 190 references to check repetitions is fun? Sure thing if you find repetitions, and best of luck for your unenviable job :D. Regarding the fan mail thing, a fan mail means a single sheet of paper on which multiple people write their love for a celebrity; in this case, the sheet is 3,600 ft long. Fan letters, I think, are different. You can change the sentence to make it grammatically appropriate, of course. Hope this helps. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Btw, great work with the copy-editing. In your opinion, after the copy-edit, is this article ready for a FAR? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you :-) and thanks for clarifying the 'fan mail' sentence, which confused me a little - I'm not Indian and sometimes trip over these little things! Re: FAR - I think the article has a way to go before it reaches FA standard so I'd recommend a Peer Reveiw before nominating it. I was being a little sarcastic about the references, by the way! :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure, no problem :D. Yeah, peer review is a must but we'll have to wait for at least one more month to update the accolades section. I know, I was carrying on the sarcasm LOL :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, I've done a lot of work on the 'Commercial analysis' section tonight, mainly grouping the text by subject. I also removed a lot of text and an unsuitable reference. However, I think this text belongs in other sections, specifically 'Promotion' and 'Critical reception', which would IMO make the article more focussed. I'll leave this alone tonight - could you take a look and let me know whether you think it should be moved? Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi. I wrote the entire commercial analysis section more or less as a follow-up to a similar section in Avatar. Yes, some of the material does tend to repeat (as pointed out by Karthik Nadar) but if I have to talk about negative word of mouth, I must also give some details about how the audience reacted. I must get down and start trimming the section up, as its way too big, so I'll see what I can do. Regards, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 04:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. I understand the need for balance and that's all fine; the refs check out well too - I'm just wondering whether to move the text. I'm going offline now, I'll be back later today. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, the moving of the text you are doing is excellent. However, you removed the "Buzz" and "Reach" factor for some reason; there was a bit about Ormax Media's tracking, and that source should explain it. I think you deleted that bit as well LOL. The buzz-reach thing is important, so if I find the source I'll put that back. Fine? Regards, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes that's fine; I've replaced the text and reference as they were. I don't understand what 'buzz' and 'reach' mean in this context and the reference doesn't explain it. I guess they mean 'audience excitement' and 'audience awareness' but I'm probably wrong. Can you please translate for non-expert readers per WP:JARGON? Thanks. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, you're not wrong. "Buzz" is a measure of how many people are interested to watch the film. "Reach" is a measure of how many people have heard of the film. Translate? You mean I should write a definition of the words in the article? I can do that; I'll check JARGON and see what I can do. Cheers! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Ankitbhatt, that will make that section a lot clearer. I think my copy-edit is about done now, though I still think there's a lot of work to do. I might try and reduce the number of references used and merge text in the section we're discussing to other parts of the article. I'll still be around WP if you need further help. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Is "contracted" a correct word or a synonym for "selected" or "signed in"?  X.One   SOS  12:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure thing Bafflegab. Lot of work :( ? Oh no! I'll surely appreciate if you could lend a hand to us as well; its a big article and sometimes, things just go wrong. Thanks a ton for the copyedits :D.
 * X.One, if you want to say "he/she was signed up for so-and-so film", then yes "contracted" does mean that. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, Ankitbhatt, I've moved all the references out of the lead; although they're not forbidden there, the material in the lead summarises that in the main article text, per WP:LEAD. I hope that's OK - please revert if I've overstepped the mark. Also, although you're probably aware of this, the 'Plot' section doesn't have any references. And I'm removing http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/sid911.aspx as a reference from the 'Pre-release revenue' sub-section as it's a dynamic page which doesn't contain the cited article and I couldn't find the article on the Internet Archive. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey. Hopefully you haven't removed some important references LOL :). Is a reference necessary for a plot? From what I've seen, plots never have references. Sure thing if you find any unnecessary ref, you can remove them (helps make the job of any reviewer easier :D ). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * All the refs went from the lead to the main article, many are named tags so there's no problem there. You're correct about the 'Plot' section: WP:FILMPLOT says, "Since the film is the primary source and the infobox provides details about the film, citing the film explicitly in the plot summary's section is not necessary". So no worries there, and I've learnt something new! :-) One thing - the text referenced by the Hindustan times ref said TV rights sold for 35 crore, the next reference said 40 crore, and the Times of India says 35 crore. Do you know which is correct? Perhaps we should say write 35-40 crore in the article. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Yup we all learn something new everyday huh? :D As far as I know, the TV rights went for 35 crores. Hindustan Times and TOI are most reliable, I think that 40 crore ref may not be a good one. Best to leave it 35 crores; its not advised to keep satellite rights as a range. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Continued vandalism of film processing articles
You've now made seven or eight attempts to break up, close down articles pertaining to processing of ECN-2 shot in still cameras. Not only was the section you removed verified (whether or not the links to it are promotional is irrelevant), but it shows a continuation of a service that Seattle Filmworks provided.You are only icnreasing promotion and misleading information by breaking up these articles, leaving as the only source for information solicitous information elsewhere, rather than informative information written by a user of this film and processing services.

Your actions indicate that you are not knowledgeable, which, I believe goes against Wikipedia policy. With whom do I speak to file a complaint about your unqualified unprofessional actions of editing a subject in which you don't have adequate background education? ~ISOGuru — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.154.66 (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, ISOGuru, you should report persistent vandalism at Administrator intervention against vandalism; other incidents can be reported at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Alternatively, you can open a Request for Comments debate. It's best if you can log into your account when you post, and please sign your edits with four tildes (~ x4). Ta, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

YOU are the vandal. You're trying to remove internal interests. Good! You realize, that by removing a list of ALL the labs that have replaced in part or in whole SFW's processing service, that you've driven the search engine results to the article on Double Exposure, Ltd. instead, right?Why would you possibly want to remove an objective list of the handful of faciliities providing this service.I am restoring that section, for objectivity's sake and so that all facilities offering the service come up. I request that you do not partake in an edit war. ISO Guru (P.S. you think I *want* my IP address on here?  No way around the firewall trying to log in...)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.154.66 (talk) 22:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've opened an WP:RFC at the article's talk page. Please click here to report me as a vandal (see above). Ta, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
This is to inform you that there is currently a peer review going on for the article Ra.One here. Your participation is most welcome. Regards, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me; although I can't really take part, I hope you receive some useful suggestions for improvement. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure you can; why not? This is just a peer review, all of us have to work together to point out any flaws and iron them out. Bollyjeff has added his concerns (and they have been duly rectified too) and he was also quite a contributor to the article. After all, this isn't the FAR :D. Your help would be really appreciated because you've been copy-editing this article and you also stated that the article has a way to go before being an FA; your inputs for improvement would be most welcome. Cheers! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you; I thought there might be a neutrality issue. I'll certainly pop over and make a few suggestions. Cheers, :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

In the date part, are you serious when you say YYYY-MM-DD? How is that possible? (Btw, it would be better if you reply in the peer review page so that everyone can discuss). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied there. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello, Baffle gab1978. I'm very grateful for the work that you've done on the article, although I have not yet had the time to look over it in its entirety. I've been very busy over the last month, so I didn't really get the chance to work on it myself. I'll renominate it if everything looks good and let's hope that the third time's a charm. RG (talk) 04:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, it's an interesting article and a pleasure to copy-edit. Wishing you all the best with your nomination. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One
Could you take a look here, go down to the bottom and see the problems regarding the critical reception section? I'd be much obliged. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Blake's 7
Hi.


 * Hi, Chizzit26, thank you for replying here, and for your points about the article. It's good to have a professional writer onboard. I've been working to knock the B7 article into shape for a while, with the aim of having it listed as a Good Article. There's a Peer Review here if you'd like to read through it. Aside from the Manual of Style, there's a specific set of guidelines for television programmes that I've tried to follow here, using a Featured Article Firefly (TV series) as an exemplar, although IMO the writing in that article could do with a copy-edit. As a fellow B7 fan, you might have access to source material that I don't; I have only the Wells/Nazarro and Attwood books and a few magazine articles that I should dig out for this purpose. Anyway, I've replied to your points below in a threaded reply; I hope that's okay. :-)


 * By the way - none of your work is totally lost; you can find your edits (we call them diffs) by looking through the article's 'History' list. I hope none of my comments appear condescending to you; since you're a new account user I don't know how much experience you have of editing Wikipedia. I'm sorry if I appear that way - it isn't intentional! :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

-Although I understand some of your changes, I must admit to being deeply concerned about the quality of this page now that it has largely reverted to the way it was before my edit. My points are as follows:

- the lead text is too long, ungainly and simply does not fulfil the role that it should. Articles summarising TV series, books and other similar media do not usually begin with a plot summary. The function of the opening section is to provide a concise explanation of the most important features of the subject of the article so that anyone browsing would quickly be able to build a clear definition in their minds. I appreciate that you have experience on your side, but I am myself both an avid Wikipedia reader and a professional editor, so am not entirely without perspective here. I do not believe that the plot details that you reveal in this opening section are remotely important for an overview of the show (the only detail I would suggest is important is that Blake is replaced by Avon, since his later prominence is so important in the series).


 * WP:LEAD - "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects." (my emphasis) and "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies." I think it's important to have some plot details in the leader and I think the ending shouldn't be glossed over. How else can we summarise the entire story arc in a short paragraph? Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

- Although Wikipedia's policy on spoilers does not make it bad form to give away crucial plot information in the lead text, this is again not an especially common practice. As someone always eager to recruit more people to my obsessive Blake's 7 fandom, I feel it is immensely counter-productive to reveal the powerful shock ending to anyone who might casually be browsing this page. Anyone who wants to know this plot detail could easily research it by looking at the 'plot summary' section. Most people, however, do not wish to know how a series ends when they are in the process of finding out about it and deciding whether to watch it. Surely a vague reference to a powerful ending would be more appropriate.


 * I'm a fan of the series too, but as WP editors we shouldn't write from a fan's perspective. I'm sure you'll appreciate that we're not writing specifically for fans or prospective fans but for a readership that knows nothing about the show, wants information about the narrative and perhaps doesn't want to delve too deeply into a long article to find it. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

- The lead section and the subsequent 'overview' section now once again contain large amounts of near-identical content, making the article laborious and repetitive.


 * That's a fair point - I think the 'Overview' section contains some redundant plot info; much of it was inherited from previous versions of the article. How do you think we should approach this section? Should it be ditched, or perhaps we could describe the B7 universe? Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

- Whilst my summary of the fictional setting of the show was probably overly long and detailed, I feel that a section of information on this would make Blake's 7 far more accessible to readers of this article who are new to the show. Otherwise, the plot summary is completely baffling to someone who is coming into this from a position of ignorance. I take your point about referencing and can address that in a rewrite.


 * You're right that 'Overview' is rather confusing. see my comments above - what should be in 'Overview'? Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

- The reason that many of my changes were listed as 'minor edits' was that most of them were. I made my substantial changes, then noticed that in my sleep-deprived state I'd make a zillion tiny phrasing or punctuation errors, which I then kept going back and changing. I hope this clarifies my approach - I did not mean to sneak important changes under other people's radar, so to speak. Chizzit26 (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * That's okay, I realised your intent was to improve the article, but it's something to be careful of when you're editing elsewhere; some WP editors might see that as an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Some of the less welcome editors of Wikipedia use the box for just that. I'm glad you're not one of those! :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Codrin.B (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyedits
Apologies - I was away for a week where I was taken ill, came back ill, and then had to go away again to a remote house with no internet (I know, in today's world, it took me by surprise!) apart from mobiles and mine didn't have access in that country apart from a small MB amount in the first few days; all in all a not-so-good month!

I am back now, but see you have already completed the copy-edit which is the best thing - there were a couple I started before I went away which I will check later tonight.

Thanks for doing that, and apologies again for my belated reply. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries - I'm sorry to hear you were ill and I hope you're feeling better now. RL has a funny habit of putting the wiki-work on hold. I'm slowly working down the list to clear some of the older requests - I'm having a little 'drive' of my own! :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One nominated for Featured Article
This notice is to inform you that I have nominated the article Ra.One for a featured article promotion. The nomination can be viewed here. Any comments are welcome at the article's or my talk page. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Good luck, Ankitbhatt|, I hope the nom goes well. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Bible translations by language
Appreciate your contributions to WP, but in this case could you please be so kind as to not add deletion tags to the articles as we break them out and develop them. This has been 2 years work. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Add references next time then, and your work won't get tagged for deletion. You can contest the prod in the usual way. AAMOF, I removed the original speedy tag from Bible translations into Cambodian, the only article that I tagged - see the article's history for my edit summary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My apologies - it happened so quickly (almost immediately I broke out the section) that I didn't have time to see that. The problem is with the behaviour of the other editor. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; sorry i was a little terse earlier. Best, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Zeteognosticism
Sorry, but I have declined all the speedies on this article. Piling up inapplicable speedies is not the way to deletion. "entry in factbook that has no content" is not a speedy reason. It is not WP:CSD nonsense, which is for things like "4g7"##*gz%" or "Yaaayyyy LOL!!!!"; nor is it a WP:CSD blatant hoax, which implies intent to deceive. This guy has made up something he wants to tell the world about, not realising that that is not what an encyclopedia is for. Many people, including me, have suggested a speedy for "Blatant NFT", but it has always been turned down, for good reasons about problems of definition. This has got to go, but PROD and if necessary AfD is the only way. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I declined first speedy,nommed it for Prod as unreffed essay, original research, told original tagger who protested my objection, then re-speedy-tagged. C'est la vie etc. :-D Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hijacked pages
Hi Baffle gab1978. I just wanted to mention that I turned down two of your speedys here and here -- not because the tag was necessarily wrong. But rather the articles had been hijackeded and needed to be restored to the prior good version. Unfortunately, it's not unusual. So, it can be a good habit to glance at the article history before tagging to see if that might be the case. Cheers. — Cactus Writer (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I should be more careful, but I usually do check the history. thanks for not deleting the article. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Lend a hand?
I could do with your help on Ra.One - again :P. No, I am not asking you to do another copy-edit; however, I really need somebody who could archive the references in the article (the number of which touched 250 today :P). I'll give a small outline :-


 * All references from Mid-Day, Box Office India, BoxOfficeIndia.co.in


 * All reviews (India and Overseas; especially overseas).

Hope you're not too busy, as I'm planning for the second FAC on April 25/26. Cheers, and thanks in advance :) ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hiya :-) I've been drinking tonight *hic*, thanks for asking though, i do appreciate it, I should have continued with archiving but got laxy. Will try and help tomorrow (sat), Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks a ton :D ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:40, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Code Chunk
Hello Baffle gab1978. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Code Chunk, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Aww thank you :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

"Hard" copy edit
Hey, I just saw your note on Calvin's page saying you were going to copy edit this article and Rude Boy, but I already did it. Just giving you a head's up; Rude Boy still needs a copy edit though. —Torchiest talkedits 22:14, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hiya Torchiest, thanks for your note; I was unaware you'd taken the article, which is fine by me. I'd copy-edited these two at Calvin's request late last year so i don't know what the outstanding issues are. I'm not taking part in the drive, btw, I'm having my own drive and working down the list. I'll grab Rube Boy if it's still free. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev
Hi, hope you're doing well. Will you be able to copy edit this. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  18:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Venastry, i'm good, thanks for asking. :-) Regrettably I'm not accepting direct copy-edit requests any more, but you can add it to the GOCE request queue. I'm working there at present so I might be the one who copy-edits  it anyway. I found I was copy-editing the same types of articles for a small group of editors and I found this situation less than desirable, so I closed my queue. Thanks for asking me anyway, good luck. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

1740 Batavia massacre
No need; it just passed FAC yesterday. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, I see you finished already. Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I haven't finished it, I'd reached 'Follow-up and further violence' with the rest to finish tonight. Congratulations on the FAC :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Chris deleting publishers.
He has made hundreds of removals on hundreds of articles. And I've already reported him. Aaron  &bull; You Da   One 23:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks - he'll end up blocked if he's not careful.Hhe's been here since 2005 so has no excuses for not knowing policies like WP:CITE. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * He is trying to get out of it now, realised he is in the wrong. Aaron  &bull; You Da   One 23:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied to him on your talk page, Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

For my reference: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thread here:  Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have been here long enough to know WP:CITE. Perhaps you should read it. Here is a quote from it (Citing_sources):


 * Newspaper articles
 * Citations for newspaper articles typically include the name of the newspaper (in italics), the date of publication, the byline (author's name) if any, the title of the article (within quotation marks), and the city of publication if not included in the name of the newspaper. Page number(s) are optional.


 * Notice that it doesn't mention publisher at all. The same applies to journals. (Compare with the equivalent paragraph for book citations, which does mention publisher). Colonies Chris (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Chris, it was your unexplained removal of data en masse that concerned me, which is the reason I took it to ANI. Calvin's correct that reviewers do like to see full referencing, although not required for GA, the publisher field is generally expected at FA. That was his concern; mine was more the loss of publisher information. I can now see your reasoning more clearly, but I don't agree that that info is instantly available at the publication's WP article although ideally it should be. I try not to be 'hysterical' about these things but at the time I was concerned at what was occurring. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev (2)
Hi. Bit of confusion there. After telling Vensatry to put his request on the GOCE requests page, you did the article without marking this on that page, and User:Easwarno1 had already booked it before you started. He appears not to have done anything yet, but please could you do the necessary to ensure that Easwarno1's time isn't wasted, and that the entry on the requests page isn't in limbo. TIA. --Stfg (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay; I'm sorry but I don't generally accept requests as I used to; I'm sorry this has caused a problem and I'll try and fix it up. My changes were minimal - other editors might see problems that I missed. I'll drop a note onto the request page forthwith. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 10:44, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just looked at it. It's fine and doesn't need any more, so I'm archiving it as done by you. I've told Easwarno1. --Stfg (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I shall be more careful to check these things in future! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you, 'tis a pleasure. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you
Thank you; it's a pleasure. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

List of chronometers
Are you still watching the FL nomination? I haven't seen you respond to any of the copyediting issues so far. The latest batch of comments from Giants2008 are nearly all copyediting issues.  Spinning Spark  11:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Yes that page is still on my watchlist, though most minor issues can be dealt with by the nominator. I'll have a look this evening. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thank you so much for the copy-edit. It's been sitting over at the GOCE for a while and I was hoping someone would be able to do it soon. :) HorrorFan121 (talk) 03:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; it was quite a quick and straightforward job. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 10:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Players (film)
Thanks for taking up the task. At present, I am occupied with a lot of real life queries, and might be unable to take a complete look at the article, but do as soon as time permits. Thanks again. Secret of success (talk)  14:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I hope the copy-edit is okay for you - feel free to change anything if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

RE:Ed, Edd n Eddy
Thanks, Baffle! Nice copy-edit! :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 11:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; happy to help. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Selena singles discography
Can you revisit the article? Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  00:31, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll be there in a couple of hours; is there anything specific I can do? Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Done - As for the above, I saw that you've added more text to the article. I've removed hyphens from 'number-one'; this seems strange as there's no hyphen used for other numbers. Feel free to replace if you wish - I hope the rest is better for you now. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your copy-editing skills on the article! I believe its ready to go to PR :) Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  11:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; good luck with the nomination. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

5to Piso
Can you please copyedit 5to Piso after you do that with Poquita Ropa? It has terrible prose and was failed at GA haha XD. —Hahc 21 01:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Hah2c, thanks for asking me, but I'll decline as I don't take direct requests any more. If you add it to the GOCE request queue when i'm done with this one, I'll probably do it when it reaches the top, but another editor might improve it before then. Your request for Quién Dijo Ayer is next in the queue, so I'll take that one unless somebody else grabs it. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Mmm Ok. Thanks! I'll add it then Haha XD —<font color="#333333">Hahc <font color="#333333">21 02:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyedit
Hey baffle i need some help with the IPad (3rd generation) copyedit. <em style="font-family:Courier;color:green">Ob <em style="font-family:Courier;color:#009ACD">tund <em style="font-family:Courier">Talk 13:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Obtund, thanks for asking, however I will respectfully refer you to the conversation above. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Ah, thank you so much - that's very refreshing! ;-D Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey ...
Thank you wholeheartedly for the kind words. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries Jivesh, you're a great editor. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks my friend. I genuinely feel the same about you. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Hate That I Love You
Hey Baffle, good job so far. Btw, when you c/e the Critical reception please re-word most of the quotes sentences cause you know that FA editors don't like quotes:) ! Thanks. — Tomica   (talk)  00:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. Btw, in the header it says "reaching the top twenty in more than thirteen countries" (my emphasis). Do you know the exact number of countries? Saying 'more than thirteen' sounds odd because thirteen is an exact and small number - we'd say "more than a thousand" for a vague estimation, but not "more than thirteen" if we mean fourteen or seventeen. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well as I can count from the Charts section there are 13 countries in which "Hate That I Love You" reached the Top 20 position. Maybe it can be re-worded like "reaching the top twenty in over thirteen countries"...? — Tomica   (talk)  00:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That still sounds like we don't know the exact amount of countries. I think it's better to say 'in thirteen countries' because if another editor says "oh but it reached the top twenty in Outer Mongolia too', it can be changed if they provide a reliable source. Anyway, I'll leave it up to you. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "in thirteen countries" is fine. :) — Tomica   (talk)  10:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't get mad...
Hi, Baffle gab1978. I am fully aware that you are not accepting copyedit requests. But please, I literally beg of you, copyedit Grey's Anatomy. I noticed you copyedited House, M.D., the article of which inspired my development of Grey's Anatomy. I have been searching for a copyeditor for this article, ever since the one given by a GOCE member wasn't sufficient in the peer reviewer's eyes. It is in the final stages of preparation for FAC, and once copyedited, I can take it there. I don't think it needs much, but I am primarily concerned with comma usage, MOS:LQ, an inconsistency with the usage of the serial comma (I prefer the serial comma), and an inconsistency of quotation styling in general. I understand that you clearly state that you don't accept requests, but I strongly urge you to consider copyediting this article. I wouldn't ask if I didn't admire your work, <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 06:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, TRLIJC16, thanks for getting in touch. I appreciate your comments; however, as you might have guessed, my answer is 'no'. I'm sorry it's had an unsatisfactory copy-edit from the GOCE; for what it's worth I agree with your assessment of that copy-editor's work on it. However - and please don't take this personally - if I make an exception for one editor, then I'll have to make exceptions for other editors too, especially since two editors have asked me for copy-edits in the past week, both of whom I've told 'no'. I won't go into the reasons behind my decision not to accept direct requests - you can dig around in my talk page history if you really wish to know.
 * I will, however, suggest a quicker way of detecting things like serial comma errors. Open the article in 'edit' mode, hit CTRL+F (if using Windows), select the edit window and search for 'and'. Check for serial commas and fix as necessary. Check quotes in the same way by searching for " (quotation mark). There's also a lot of overlinking of common terms in that article that you should remove. I'd encourage you to re-add it to the GOCE request queue for further copy-editing, who knows I might be there if and when it reaches the top...


 * I really wish you well for the article's next FA review; you've put so much work into it and it's a good article with lots of information there. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I completely understand. Thank you for the advice! <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 16:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi again, can you tell me what common terms are overlinked in the article? <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 07:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Certainly.
 * In the header - 1st para: surgical, racially diverse, 2nd para: 0, 3rd para, 0.
 * Production: rasicm, color, racial diversity, executive producers, costume design.
 * Casting: brunette, homophobic slur, spin-off, maternity leave.
 * Filming locations and technique: helipad. 'Overview'': voice-over, fiscal year, finale.
 * Main characters: general surgeon, (you might include the various types of surgery etc - up to you) on-again, off-again relationship, sexual affair, United States Army, Post-it note, shooting spree, specialty, aviation accident.
 * Recurring characters: sexual activity, laid off, sabbatical, veterinarian, disciplinary probation, cancer, ferryboat, personality disorder, cardiac arrest, limbo, bomb crisis, resuscitated, depression, homosexuality, heart surgery.
 * Music event: cover versions, head-on collision, premature baby.
 * Critical response: musical episode. U.S. television ratings: network television, sweeps.
 * Distribution: regions, pre-order, bloopers, behind the scenes.
 * Have fun. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've addressed the overlinking issues. Thanks again! <font color="blue" size="3px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">TRLIJC19  (<font color="green" size="2px"><font face="Comic Sans MS">talk  ) 19:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot
Hi, Thanks very much for copyediting Battle of Nazareth (1918) your interest and time are very much appreciated. All the best, --Rskp (talk) 06:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries :-), Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Agneta Matthes
Thank you for taking good care of the lady, improving the prose, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I hope the article is better now. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:15, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think so, that's what I was trying to say, English is not my language ;) - You are quite welcome to look at all my articles, + the ones I am asked to check for translations. (I am so modest.) Yesterday I started looking at A Year Ago in Winter and gave up on the "criticism" section, now a comment ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, it's no problem :-) I don't take direct copy-edit requests, but please feel free to add your requests to this page, where Agneta Matthes was listed, and someone should copy-edit the articles for you. Translations into English can be tricky, and sometimes interpreting what is meant is difficult; the section you mention is probably a computer translation, which has become nonsense and would be almost impossible to interpret properly without a good knowledge of German, which I don't have.You're doing a fine job there; WP needs  more editors like you. ;-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Previous discussions are available at: User talk:Baffle gab1978/Archives/March 2012 - August 2012

I will be watching!!!
Hey, I will be watching your edits about Yamilet, naaa work freely! Thanks for editing. Osplace 01:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Excelent work! Thanks for your work. Osplace 16:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, happy to help :-). Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Missing My Baby
Well the article was opposed by one user so far because of the prose so I was wondering, would it be okay to ask User:Stfg to see if he can do anything about it? He has asked to see if the original copy-editor accepts that (per his talk page above). Best, Jona  talk to me  13:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hiya Jona, yes that's okay - please do ask Stfg if he can improve the article. However, I think the article needs more substantial content before it becomes an FA; that's just my opinion though. Best of luck with the nom. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There's nothing else that could be added, furthermore there are shorter FA articles than this one =). But thanks and best, Jona  talk to me  00:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

RE: Swaminarayan Sampraday
Much Delayed Thank you for the copy-edit! I was on a wikibreak, hence replying now. Cheers Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 16:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; welcome back to WP :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Prometheus
Thanks for taking the job on. If you haven't seen the film and need any help understanding a particular context feel free to ask. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I'll check references where needed, but if I can't find something I need to clarify I'll drop you a note. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * So I'm just confirming, was the problem with the ref sorted or do you still need me to check? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes the referenced article covers the sentence previous to the one I removed; thanks for asking. Reference link here. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Causality in Prometheus article
Thanks for your work in copy editting on Prometheus, I see that the prose has improved, but I'd like to point out a few flaws I think you've missed. Nothing personal. I agree with most of your edits, but the causality and clarity in the synopsis have some problems.

Regarding this section:

''Janek also determines that the underground structure is in fact a spacecraft. Weyland and a team return to the structure and awaken the Engineer. David speaks to the Engineer, who responds by decapitating him and killing Weyland and his team. Shaw escapes the spacecraft as the Engineer activates it. She warns Janek that the Engineer is planning to release the liquid on Earth and convinces Janek to stop the spacecraft. **Vickers escapes via a lifeboat and an escape pod, and Janek collides the Prometheus with The Engineer's disabled spacecraft, which crashes onto the planet; its wreckage crushes Vickers.**''

I'd like to convince you to keep the previous phrasing of the part in **..** section. In the current version, when readers reach 'Vickers escapes via a lifeboat and an escape pod,' it gives some readers a 'what?' moment in the first read. They might question 'why is she running?' and 'where is she running from?' The preceding sentences don't answer those questions. The logical connection between Vickers escaping and the previous event isn't evident. And even if the latter part of the sentence answers them, it doesn't do a very good job. It's causally jarring. (Please re-read, to see what I mean.) The context didn't explain well enough where Vickers is either. This version reads as if she was on the alien spacecraft with the Engineer instead of aboard the Prometheus. Also, Vickers's location has only been implied many sentences ago. And implied only, which is totally missable. This entire article doesn't say she's always been on the Prometheus. Casual readers won't remember where she is by the time they reach here. Without firmly establishing where she is, it produces an awkward moment when readers have to go back to look for her location again. It also doesn't tell where the escape pod or the lifeboat are. It could've been installed on the planet.

Also, in the current version, you said 'Janek collides the Prometheus with The Engineer's disabled spacecraft'. This means the spacecraft is already disabled before the collision. This is not true. The craft works. Just dormant until the Engineer pilots it. It's disabled after the collision. That's the whole point of the collision.

If you use this version:

''She warns Janek that the Engineer is planning to release the liquid on Earth and convinces Janek to stop the spacecraft. Janek collides the Prometheus with the craft, but before the collision Vickers escaped via a lifeboat and an escape pod. The Engineer's disabled spacecraft crashes onto the planet; its wreckage crushes Vickers.''

If you use this version, there's a clear logical connection between that section and the preceding sentence. Shaw convinced Janek to stop the Engineer's ship. And in the next sentence, Janek collide Prometheus with the ship to stop it. The questions of where and why are also answered. Vickers escapes from the Prometheus because of the incoming collision. The lifeboat and the escape pod are implied to be onboard. (Or if you must add it for clarity, we can just add 'aboard' or 'onboard' behind 'the escape pod.') The chronology is a bit unorthodox, but the message itself doesn't break the chronology. It happens exactly like that in the movie: Shaw convinces Janek that the Engineer is going to release the dark liquid on Earth, so Janek decides to collide the Prometheus into the Engineer's spaceship. And while they're accelerating the Prometheus toward the spaceship, Vickers sees what's happening and escapes via a pod. The Prometheus explodes. Vickers emerges from the pod. The Engineer's spaceship crashes shortly after, and its wreckage crushes Vickers.

So due to the reasons listed above, I'd like to convince you to use the previous phrasing or improve on it to keep the causality. Or at least, agree to let me fix this without reverting it, to avoid dispute. Anthonydraco (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Anthonydraco, I understand your point; I haven't seen the film so I'm just working from what's already written in the article. Please feel free to alter the passage; I'll be editing later so I'll insert your version if it's not done by the time I start working on it. Another pair of eyes is always a good thing :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Done - Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Cheers. And thanks for understanding. Sorry for the massive wall of text. I need to convey all the points. :P Anthonydraco (talk) 12:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Can I ask you questions regarding language?
Are you a native speaker? Would you mind if I consult you on English from time to time? Anyway, since I'm here, does 'finding a father-figure in the form of' sound excessive? Is it idiomatic? Would it be more concise to say 'finding a father-figure in'?
 * Hi Anthony, please do feel free to ask - yes I'm a native speaker though certainly not an expert. I'm from the UK. You're correct that 'finding a father figure' is idiomatic; a father figure is an older male to whom someone younger - usually but not always female - would look to for help, guidance or comfort. So we might say, "Susan found a father figure in David", or "David was a father figure to Susan". "Susan was finding a father figure in the form of David" is grammatically correct but might be rephrased as the first or second examples. It depends on the context of use, of course, and note this is not a definitive answer. I hope that's useful. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * An, thanks. So I can cut 'in the form of' without losing its meaning/idiomatic form? Anthonydraco (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, 'the form of' is essentially redundant. Always consider the context though. ;-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Awww thank you :-) It's a pleasure, Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

English/American English
Good morning,

Do you remember this: ''17:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Gareth, I hope Ajona doesn't mind me posting here. You should use American (US) English for Selena articles per WP:ENGVAR - I noted an instance of 'favoured' instead of 'favored'; it's not really a big deal but it's for FA and as they say at Tesco, every little helps. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; you should also mark the GOCE request as Working so that other editors don't jump in unawares, and Done when you're finished. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)''

I should be glad of your assistance with another spelling. I feel I must change 'loose' to 'lose'.

This is the content: ... fears that if she allows him to stay attached, she may "loose control". What do you say I should do here?

Sincerely -- Gareth Griffith-Jones  (talk) 08:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Gareth; in that context 'lose' is correct: 'If I race against an athlete faster than me, I will lose the race'. 'Loose' is an adjective that means 'not tight': 'The robbers tied me up but the ropes were loose'. It's not an ENGVAR issue, but it is a common misspelling. Hope that helps. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It was the ENGVAR issue only that troubled me.  I shall make the edit ... would not have wanted to offend our American friends ... thought it better to check with you beforehand.  I have enjoyed the copy-editing exercise.
 * Kindest regards, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones  (talk) 11:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, I'm glad to hear you enjoy copy-editing, hope to see you around a bit more. :-) Feel free to ask me anything you're uncertain of, I'll do my best to help if I can. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I certainly shall. Many thanks for the kind offer. Sincerely  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones  (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Prometheus
Hi there. I noticed you added Prometheus to the August copy edit contest, but it doesn't look like you've done any edits to the article. I was just checking to see if you had plans to do any editing to it, as the contest ends in ~33hrs, or if you'd added the wrong article, or if perhaps you had any other questions about the contest. Cheers. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 14:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I added the incorrect article - I'll change it forthwith. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, good news! Glad it wasn't a major issue. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 20:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, and thank you for informing me of the problem. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

God of War (series) and (video game) copy-edit
Hey. I recently added some new info to both pages (God of War (series) and God of War (video game)). Could you copy-edit the new info? -- JDC808  ♫  00:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I will do video game, as I've already copy-edited that article. But I haven't copy-edited series - so it's 'no' to that one per my policy of not accepting private requests, although I'll be happy to copy-edit it from the GOCE list. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * That's right lol I forgot you didn't do the series. Okay, thanks. -- JDC808  ♫  02:26, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Just saw that you already did it. Thanks. Quick question, how come you remove the wikilinks for the movies? -- JDC808  ♫  02:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I found the answer in the link you provided in your Edit Summary. -- JDC808  ♫  03:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

No worries; I'm now done - I've taken some of the less relevant material out but I've tried to keep the important points in there. I hope that's okay for you - feel free to revert if you wish. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * It's all good. Thanks again. The only thing I changed was the tense of a couple words in the last part about Ares because it sounded kinda weird in the past-tense since they're currently working on it. -- JDC808  ♫  04:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Opinion
I'm not asking for a copy-edit but an opinion on a couple of sentences. One editor believes the sentences should be written one way because it apparently avoids awkward phrasing. I believe they should be written another way because it gets rid of unnecessary parenthesis, what kinda looks like repetition, and I don't really see the awkward phrasing the other editor speaks of. Here they are:


 * The parenthesis issue.

Other editor version

At PAX 2012, it was revealed that the three Furies are the main antagonists, (Megaera, one of the three Furies, was featured in a new trailer) whom Kratos must defeat to sever his bonds to Ares.

My version

At PAX 2012, it was revealed that the three Furies are the main antagonists of the game who Kratos must defeat to break his bonds to Ares. Megaera, one of the three Furies, was featured in a new trailer.


 * Bg1978 reply; I'd write the above as: "At PAX 2012, 'Person/company A' announced that the three Furies, who Kratos must defeat to break his bonds with Ares, are the main antagonists of the game. Megaera, one of the Furies, was featured in a new trailer." I agree the parenthesis is awkward and unnecessary in the first version. In my version I've placed the clause who Kratos must defeat to break his bonds with Ares, between the other elements because it's describing the Furies, not the game. I removed 'three' from the second sentence because it's repetitious - we already know there are three Furies.


 * The somewhat repetition. It may not be repetition, but I find "explore the possibility of using" unnecessary because before that, it states Papy "would like to explore".

Other editor version

Todd Papy also revealed that the goddess Artemis was considered as a playable female character in the game, offering different combat options to Kratos. The character apparently would have been half-human and half-feline, possessing the head and torso of a woman and the legs of a lioness. Artemis was ultimately cut from the game, although Papy stated he would like to explore the possibility of using other gods in the future.

My version

Todd Papy also revealed that the goddess Artemis was considered as a playable female character in the game, offering different combat compared to Kratos. The character apparently would have been half-human and half-feline, possessing the head and torso of a woman and the legs of a lioness. Artemis was ultimately cut from the game, although Papy stated he would like to explore other gods in the future.


 * Bg1978 reply. My version would be as follows: "Todd Papy also said that he considered using the goddess Artemis as a playable female character, which would offer the player alternative combat options. Artemis would have been depicted as half-human and half-feline, with the head and torso of a woman and the legs of a lioness. Artemis was ultimately cut from the game, but Papy said he would like to explore the possibility of using other gods in the future." To say he "would like to explore other gods" is ambiguous; it might mean he wants to change his religion - 'explore to possibility of using' means he's considering using other deities as characters in the future.


 * Another area of disagreement. There's unnecessary parenthesis again and I find my version to be clearer in regards to the second half about the TV episode.

Other editor version

The character has also been parodied twice in The Simpsons fictional universe, appearing as the "God of Wharf" on a billboard advertising a chowder restaurant in The Simpsons Game and in The Simpsons television series (the Guts of War II: Entrails of Intestinox kiosk for "E4", a parody of E3).

My version

The character has also been parodied twice in The Simpsons fictional universe. Kratos first appeared as the "God of Wharf" on a billboard advertising a chowder restaurant in The Simpsons Game, and later appeared on the Guts of War II: Entrails of Intestinox kiosk for "E4" (a parody of E3) in The Simpsons television episode, "The Food Wife."


 * Bg1978 reply; I'd largely prefer your version, but remove 'also' unless you're mentioning other parodies before it. Remove the second 'appeared', de-wikilink 'chowder' (common term), 'for' doesn't seem to fit that clause properly; is the parody character advertising E4, is this seen at E4? You can usually replace brackets with unspaced em-dashes or spaced en-dashes or if it's not too awkward, commas. I try to avoid using brackets wherever I can because I find them visually awkward - they present a physical barrier to the reader whereas dashes and commas simply separate clauses. I hope the above is useful to both of you. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

-- JDC808  ♫  21:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This is helpful. -- JDC808  ♫  23:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries - although i should add that my comments about brackets (being visually awkward) is simply my opinion and is not WP policy. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Falkirk F.C.
Thank you for completing the article I requested. Just a few things that need mentioning. A few of the leagues which Falkirk has competed in over the years need to be corrected to correspond with their names at the time of competing which have changed so often in time, which I am willing to correct. Also there appears to be one sentence under the "Stadiums" heading that needs amending if you don't mind having a look: "after one season, Falkirk moved to Randyford Park, the home of East Stirlingshire Cricket Club during the summer months, in 1878 was where the club played its first competitive match, which it won against Campsie Glen of Lennoxtown in the Scottish Cup." And under "Supporters and rivalries" it was East Stirlingshire that won the last competitive league fixture 3–0 and not Falkirk. Other than that I can't see any other things to be changed. Once again thanks for your time!  Cal Umbra (talk) 01:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Cal, thanks for contacting me - Yes I'll have a look at those sentences and correct them. Is it just the capital on the 'Randyford Park' sentence? My error - oops! I'll let you correct the leagues' names as you probably have more info than I do. I wanted to avoid things like 'first tier', 'top flight' etc. Thanks. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, just that sentence that I noticed, nothing else I can see. That appears to be all. Thanks once again.  Cal Umbra (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Done and no worries; wishing you well with your future nomination. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

 * Just for curiosity; is noun in apposition outdated or not generally used in British or American English anymore? I noticed that you have changed all such phrasings in Jury section like "Recipient of Padma Shri (2011), Kasaravalli, is a Kannada film director" to "Kasaravalli is a recipient of Padma Shri (2011), and is a Kannada film director". I don't mind this new phrasing but simply thought of knowing the reason behind it. ||<span style="font-family:;font-size:;color:;background-color:;"> || {T/C} 07:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, there's no strict rule against subject nouns in apposition, and it's not considered archaic, but in both BrEng and AmEng it's usual to emphasise the person's name by placing it before the modifying phrase (Recipient of Padma Shri (2011)). Putting the person's name after the award s/he received diminishes his/her importance in the sentence. I could say, for example, "Kasaravalli, a recipient of Padma Shri (2011), is a Kannada film director", in which "recipient of Padma Shri (2011)" is a subordinate (less important) clause. Placing the subject noun first also reduces the number of clauses used and makes the meaning clearer. I'm not aware of how Indian English treats syntax, so I deferred to Standard British English - please feel free to modify these sentences if necessary. Thank you for the cupcake - it was very tasty. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the much needed copy editing of the article. We do appreciate all your efforts and interest. - <span style="font:italic bold 12px/30px Georgia, serif"><font color="#808080">Vivvt &bull;&#32; (<font color="#000000">Talk ) 11:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Coffee!

 * Thank you :-) I'll try not to stir up any edit wars. I hope my changes won't be too contentious. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all the work and putting the citation needed templates, will be easier to find and source them. I haven't seen it in detail, is the English used American or British? Will ping you again if anything comes up. <font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar <font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk 07:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; the article uses British English. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I seem to be a tad newer to Wikipedia than you so I may be a bit less familiar with how things are done. You undid the work I did today on Digital versus film photography I understand how Wikipedia doesn't want original research but the Cost section was very incomplete, You deleted quite a lot of information which may be valuable to some who want to compare. I have been a professional photographer for over 15 years and I am very knowledgeable on the subject. Everything I wrote can be easily verified and much of it was linked to sources. Rather than deleting the whole thing, please let me know specifically what is considered original research so I can find sources and we can improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bblawsonnn (talk • contribs) 01:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Bblawsonnn; |here's a comaprison of versions. Specifically, I was most concerned about the lack of sources in the text beginning "If we use 50 cents per image as a cost factor...". This is original research because it doesn't appear to come from any published source. The policy WP:Original research says: "Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources themselves." Nikon and E-bay are also questionable sources and IMO it's hardly fair to compare new gear to old.

Please don't let my reversion discourage you from editing. And all WP content is retained and is ultimately retrievable. I appreciate that you're a knowledgeable pro and can substantiate the information, and I'll be glad to see you adding it back with reliable sources. That article needs all the help it can get! BTW, I studied photography at degree level (2007) but I don't consider myself a pro. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I have an idea, how about putting my text back in with "add citation" where one is needed. Then I can go back and add a citation or reword the sentence to address your concerns. I will do more research to back up what I have written as I get time.


 * In reply to my comparing old gear to new, Isn't that the whole basis of the article? Film has been around since 1800s, Digital has been around for only a few years. Anyway, I can add new film cameras in the cost comparison.


 * IMO to rewrite this section is not a practical use of my time, but to correct what I have written is more sensible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bblawsonnn (talk • contribs) at 16:05 BST on 26 September 2012


 * The basis of the article is a comparison of two different media. I think the comparison of cameras would be fine if you're comparing new with new at 2012 prices. | Nikon USA currently offers two film SLRs; the F6 is  $2,669.95 and the FM10 is $319.95. Those would be a fair comparison with DSLRs, and not original research. Had your comparison been taken from a single, reliable source that would have been fine too - but to do the comparison yourself is original research.


 * Your final paragraph is original research; adding a citation tag doesn't address my concerns. I think it would be better to find references before adding it back - unreferenced original research is liable to removal without notice per WP:OR. If you wish, you can post your reference(s) here and I'll add it/ them to the article for you - please supply author, title and publisher, and ISBN, page no., url, publication date and location if possible. I've copy-edited your text (below), removing opinion and unrealistic comparisons (potential image quality etc) but leaving in the print-price and camera price comparisons - feel free to use it and I can sort out the OR and Nikon price comparison issues.


 * I hope you don't mind me putting your text into a quote box - it displays quoted text more clearly on the screen. I also signed your comments for you using the time and date of your last edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks ...
... for keeping tabs on other requests on the GOCE requests page and chasing up editors. It's a big help. If you decide to take over those articles, I'll give you any backing needed. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries - I'll probably do Delhi once I've finished the one I'm doing now; the other should probably go back into the queue if there's no response within (say) a few days. Anyway I'm happy to chase these things up when I can. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

August 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Award

 * Thank you :-) Yay woohoo.... I winned a shiny thing! :-D Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Dianna claims to sell hers on ebay, but of course hers have celebrity status. I can't get any cents out of mine. You deserved the shiny; it was a great copy edit. --Stfg (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Awww shucks, guys.... :-D I like the idea of the contest, it's a great way to get others interested in the Guild. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Assad
Thank you alot for your advices and c/e. --<font face="Old English Text MT"><font size="3" color="Black">Wüstenfuchs 07:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help. --<font face="Old English Text MT"><font size="3" color="Black">Wüstenfuchs 10:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Thank you very much; I'm glad the article has been promoted; very well done for your efforts there! :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!
Cheers! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 23:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you - i hope you had a great night too :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Brownie Mary
Any chance you can copyedit Brownie Mary? It was previously listed at GCE, but I think the original copyeditor gave up. See Talk:Brownie Mary. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 09:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm sorry the other editor didn't do the job properly. Unfortunately I don't take direct c/e requests any more, and User:Diannaa has already copy-edited the article. If you add it back to the request queue I'll c/e it when it reaches the top. There's drive in November so someone else might take it first; if not it should reach the top fairly quickly. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries! :) Viriditas (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. I've popped a note on Viriditas' talk page encouraging him to re-request it. The "very light copy edit" was exclusively an introduction of errors, really dismal. I've promised Viriditas that it will get done within a week or two. I'll be glad to do it if not beaten to it. Cheers, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 10:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Stfg - I'll likewise I'll be happy to c/e this one if it reaches the top of the queue. After checking the article's history I understand Viriditas' disappointment; however if I accept one direct request I'll probably be deluged again. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Lloyds TSB
Thanks for your edits! Cloudbound (talk) 23:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Enderlein
Hello,

thank you for your copyedits! I translated Ehrenpreis and Goldene Ehrennadel. I am not sure if "needle" is the best translation for "Nadel". The prize looks like this. Perhaps there is a special word for it in English. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 20:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Tomcat - no worries, and thanks for explaining the awards. '"Ehrenpreis" (Honorary Award)" and '"Goldene Ehrennadel" (Golden Honorary Needle)' are fine in the article - we can understand that. I'd have used Google to translate but that's often a poor solution! :-D Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Copy-Edit for literally 3 extremely short paragraphs
Hi, would you mind doing a copy-edit that should take like less then 5 minutes for this article? The lead and the one short paragraph in the "Splash Works" is all I'm asking. I'm trying to get the list to FLC and one of the reviewers said I should get the article copy-edited.--Dom497 (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Dom, I appreciate that's a short article, but the answer is 'no'. I can't make exceptions - otherwise I'll be knee-deep in requests. I respectfully direct you to the advice in the fourth bullet point of my talk page, above. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * So if I were to list the article on the request page would you copy edited it?--Dom497 (talk) 23:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I probably would, if it reaches the top before someone else grabs it. There's a drive on this month so you've a much better chance of getting a quick c/e. Mention that it's a short, lightweight article. I hope you understand me reasons for saying 'no' to you and the editor above; it's nothing personal. I used to take requests and had so many at one point I felt bogged down by them. It just got silly - see | here. So now I work from the GOCE queue and I feel much less frustrated on WP. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand, its not like the end of the world because you said no! :p --Dom497 (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

September 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Award

 * A worthy winner. Congratulations! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones / The Welsh Buzzard 13:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * W00T and Much Yayness!!!! Thank you both so much for your comments, and thanks for the award - it's good to know my work is appreciated. I'd like to thank the GOCE, the c/e requester, my manager, my editor, my ISP, Jimmy Wales, my aunt in Australia, the postman.... :-D Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Charmbracelet
Hi Baffle, I really appreciate your c/e. I didn't realize my co-editor nominated it for the GOCE. That's awesome though, it's been sitting in limbo for a while until a third-party source came and assisted in its quest for GA. Let me know when you're done so I can maybe add a few things I felt were needed. Again, thanks a lot for the help :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   00:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I'm moving lots of text from 'Music and lyrics' to 'Reception', and moving similar/repeated text from ' Development and recording', and have already removed much text which I felt was waffly. Feel free to discuss my removals etc. Also, please see my comments here. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure thing buddy! I agree that often quotes and paragraphs are misplaced into the wrong sections. I took a quick glance and I don't really seem to have any queries with your removals. Only thing I might re-add to some extent are those quotes you posted on the talk page. They seem beneficial to the article.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   00:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, and thanks for the feedback; I thought they were a bit redundant as the material is already in the text, but feel free to replace them. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

October 2012 Copy Edit of the Month
I added questions for everyone who made a submission at the October CEM contest. Please answer when you have a chance. Thanks! —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 18:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dredd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital Download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

 * Aww thank you... mmmmm nom nom nom nom.. ;-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smooth Radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback 2
Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Heart of a Woman
Baffle, thanks for your copyedit; it's much appreciated. I'll take a closer look at the aspects that make the article "essay-like" at my first convenience. Much of it is easily dealt with, so thanks for the feedback through your edit summaries. I also appreciate your thoroughness, since it makes things much easier at FAC. Cheers to you, and happy holidays. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; good luck with your nomination, though I'd suggest getting it peer reviewed first. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello again. I was hoping you could take a look over a paragraph I added to God of War (video game) (which you have previously copy-edited). It's the last paragraph of the Development section right before the Voice cast sub-section here. -- JDC808  ♫  23:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- JDC808  ♫  03:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; it's done. cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello again. I've added a Reception section to List of God of War characters and was hoping you could copy-edit it. Some other things have changed to the article itself since you originally copy-edited it if you could do a quick look over to see if anything catches your eye. -- JDC808  ♫  05:10, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll have a look tonight or tomorrow. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 12:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Done - I removed a couple of reviews that appear to fail WP:RS; they're on the article's talk page. I haven't checked the rest of the article since I don't know what's been altered since my c/e. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you again and don't worry about the rest. My biggest concern was the Reception section. -- JDC808  ♫  05:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Section "Removed material". -- JDC808  ♫  21:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

TB -- JDC808  ♫  02:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

School of advanced military studies
I saw you started to copy edit the page School of Advanced Military Studies. Just wanted to say thank you. If you have any questions, please ask. Casprings (talk) 07:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, and thank you :-) My main concern at the moment is the large quantity of quotations and 'waffle', the removal of which I think will be my main task. I'll certainly ask if I need to clarify anything - I prefer working with requesting editors when needed. Meanwhile, feel free to tell me if I inadvertently remove something vital. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I would agree. I actually haven't added anything to the article.  I just know the institution and know the article's information is there.  There are some problems, but I didn't want to go in and do it.  I am not totally versed with what is seen as ideal on wikipedia.  I am learning, however. User:Airborne84 has really done the most work on the article.  Casprings (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I see; I thought you and Airborn84 might be working together, which was the reason you'd asked for copy-edit. Thanks for explaining; I'll post a note on his/her talk page as s/he's the main contributor. WP is a steep learning curve sometimes. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for your copy editing effort on this article! I appreciate your time. Best, --Airborne84 (talk) 16:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; good luck with the GA nom, and have a good wikibreak.:-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Century!

 * Really??? Crikey - I had no idea, I thought it was around 80. :-o I've no intention of becoming indispensable, but I'm happy to continue to take articles as they reach the top of the list. Thanks for the award, it's appreciated. :-D Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:pink; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks"> Da panda of pandemonium has given you a puppy! Puppies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your puppy must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a puppy, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of puppies by adding {{subst:Puppy}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.


 * Awww, thanks :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

October 2012 Copy Edit of the Month Award
Oooooooh, more shiny, thank you :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Tardy response re copy-edit of Dostoyevsky
Hi Baffle gab1978,

Sorry for not getting back to you before, but I saw your reply just now – it got mixed up with others. Thanks for asking and popping by my talk page. By the way, I'm utterly amazed at the speed you copy-edit one article after another. *I wanna be like you when I grow up*.

Cheers, --<font face="Segoe Print" size="3" color="#BC8F8F">Coco <font size="3" face="Segoe Print"  color="#008080">Lacoste  <font face="Segoe Print" size="3" color="#800080">talk  01:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

PS, Replying here just in case my page isn't on your watchlist any more, hope you won't mind.


 * Hi Cocolacoste, thanks for your note, I don't mind a bit. :-) I saw your reply on your talk page, but didn't reply in depth because Stfg had already responded and the article archived, and I understand you're busy in RL. Thanks for your compliment too - though it seems the quicker I copy-edit articles, the longer the list grows... ;-) I really spend far too much time on Wiki when I should be sleeping! :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thanks very much for doing the copy edit of Donkey Punch (novel), &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Completed copyedit looks great, thanks again, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I'll do The War for Late Night next (unless someone else grabs it), that one might take a little longer. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

re The War for Late Night
Okay sounds good, thanks very much for all your help, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll keep an eye on it. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I think I only have one more article pending for a copyedit request. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
Just let me know when you're all done. :) Also, if you're interested in the subject matter of this article, perhaps you'd like to join WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
 * No worries; I probably won't remove too much text this time, as I haven't seen anything particularly objectionable - it'll be in my edit summaries if I do. I appreciate the thought, but politics goes mostly over my head... :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I might remove some of the quotes per WP:QUOTEFARM. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks again, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and added three more to the bottom at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. These are: Beck v. Eiland-Hall, Everything Tastes Better with Bacon, and Targeted Killing in International Law. An eclectic mix, I know. :) No rush, but you've done such a great job with the others, I just thought I'd let you know, to keep you in the loop. Think about WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech, if you're interested, we'd love to have you as a member. Thanks again, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries - and yes that's an eclectic mix all right. :-D I copy-edit from the top of the GOCE queue, taking the oldest requests, and the wait is about 1 month at the moment. There's a drive in Jan so someone else could grab them before they reach the top. I'll keep the project in mind, thanks for asking and I appreciate your comments - but the GOCE keeps me busy for now. ;-) Best of luck with the nominations, Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay sounds good, no worries, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

2010 United Kingdom government formation
Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">  Gareth Griffith-Jones  – The Welsh  Buzzard  – is wishing you the season's greetings. Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus, or the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.

–&#32; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard &#124; 11:18, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kindness shown this year. →‎I am now a 'Reviewer'! –&#32;


 * Thank you Gareth, Happy Yuletide, hope you have a lovely holiday :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

— ΛΧΣ  21  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. — ΛΧΣ  21  05:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Thank you, and I hope you have a lovely holiday too. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

FLC
Hi sir, would you take a look on List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra as I want to take this to FLC. I request you to pls help me regarding this, I would be grateful to you. Also, could you pls point out its weaknesses and strengths. Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 09:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, PKS, I don't accept direct copy-edit requests any more, please solicit the generous assistance of the Guild of Copy Editors - you might be (un)lucky enough to find me working there. The ongoing peer review should help you get feedback to help you with your planned nomination. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 10:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not asking for copy edit. I'm just asking your suggestion over the list. That's it.Pks1142 (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I have commented on the Peer Review. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank You so much for pointing out the mistakes. I had adopted everything and thanks for your contribution. PLease, check it how it has shaped up now.Pks1142 (talk) 05:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, you said you would be working on the list, what happened? Please, start and inform me for the help.Pks1142 (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Patience is a virtue. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will wait. Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 10:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going offline now, back later today, or early hours tomorrow GMT. It's looking better. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, you said, you would work on that. But, you only suggested. I am asking you to work on the article.Pks1142 (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And I said I don't accept direct copy-edits, with a suggestion to use the GOCE queue. I've left my suggestions on the Peer Review as you requested, I hope they're useful to you. Cheers and Happy Yuletide, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok Thanks, I understood. Well, the list is Queued at Copy Edit Guild and when you would think to copy edit, Then you do. Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 04:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

No worries, Pks; keep your eyes on the PR page as someone else is reviewing it (see below). The GOCE queue is currently waiting about a month for c/e, though there's a drive next month and someone else might grab it before it reaches the top. Cheers, and seasonal good wishes to you. ;-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

<font color ="RED" face= "Verdana">AARON &bull; TALK  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. <font color ="RED" face= "Verdana">AARON &bull; TALK  17:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Aaron, and all the best to you too. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive1
Hi Baffle gab1978, long time no speak. I was wondering if you could fix the headings on your review here, because level 2 headings are not allowed as this messes with the WP:PR ToC. Once you have, I can begin my peer review. I apologize for any inconvenience. Regards, and happy holidays. —<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="black"> WP: <font color="#0075FF">PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  00:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Penguin, I didn't know that; I thought it would make editing and commenting easier for everyone - didn't think it would upset something else! I'll do it pronto, thanks for the heads-up! Cheers, and Happy Yuletide to you too ;-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * done - sorry again. BTW requesting editor seems in a hurry to get this to FLC; see my talk for his/her comments - no biggie just a heads-up. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Baffle gab, for the fix and the heads-up! The nominator seems to be very serious about the article, so I'll check it ASAP. Cheers. —<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="black"> WP: <font color="#0075FF">PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  03:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, have a good 'un. ;-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, well I know you don't accept copy - edit request directly. But, I'm still asking you for that. Because, I think a nice copy-edit will enhance the chance of promotion to FA. I also know ,it would take lot of time to get completely copy- edited from Wikipedia Guild. That's why I'm asking bcoz I need to complete it before my exams starts. I would be free only from July afterwards. So, pls do that for me. It would be great help. I would be nominating it after the January end as then all awards would be distributed and the article would be stable. So, pls help me by copy editing as its not too large. Thank you.Pks1142 (talk) 18:25, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Note of thanks
Just a quick note to thank everyone for their Christmas and New Year wishes; I hope you all had a lovely day and will enjoy the rest of the holidays in peace, plenty and good cheer. May we all find the strength to put aside all resentments towards others; only then will we achieve real peace on Earth. Best wishes from Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:white; font color:red; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Merry Christmas to you and everybody you love. Thanks for being so good in your work and I wish a great year ahead. You are among the Best editors on Wikipedia and I hope you will continue to contribute to the Wikipedia. Thank you for your help and I hope you would help me in future aswell. Lots of FAs and FLs. Regards Pks1142 (talk) 03:31, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

FLC Nomination
I have nominated the chopra awards list. Please feel free to contribute Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive1. It got better after the peer review Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 04:37, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Pks, but I'm not a reviewer so I'll pass. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, well I know you don't accept copy - edit request directly. But, I'm still asking you for that. Because, It is already nominated for FLC. I also know ,it would take lot of time to get completely copy- edited from Wikipedia Guild. That's why I'm asking bcoz I need to complete it before my exams starts. I would be free only from July afterwards. So, pls do that for me. It would be great help. So, pls help me by copy editing as its not too large. Please do this for me. It is not tok large, you can do in a day. I would be grateful to you. Thank you.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 16:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've commented on the prose on the review; back later to review the list. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Please, see again. I had corrected everything and could you please copy-edit, the list as fast as you can because it will help in FLC.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 07:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for making the changes suggested, the article is looking much better now. I've commented on the list sections at the review, and I also draw your attention to a general point concerning the use of numerals, which I've added above my earlier comments. My response to your c/e request remains the same, but I wish you well with your nomination. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, the other editors are not talking back to the archive page. What to do....even I had adopted their thoughts in the article.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 06:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Be patient - it's the weekend and many folks are on their Christmas and New Year breaks. Most people have lives outside Wikipedia that take precedence - we're all volunteers and you can't expect them to drop everything for your benefit. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, I had resolved your comments but you missed to add The Resolved Template to the page. Please add that template. Thank you.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 18:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Marked as resolved - I didn't use the template because it messed up my text. I've left a comment on the review. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, as requested by all of you a peer review is currently going on Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2. Please, contribute to the PR and help it in its improvisation.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 08:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No. I'm finished with this - I've done all I can to help you with this. Please implement the changes recommended on the FL Review, take it slowly, have some patience and only re-nominate for FL review when the list is truly ready. It's not a race or a contest - take your time as there is no deadline. Cheers and good luck, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ooooo, I didn't read that but now I had read. Ok, I'll go slowly but please, free it fast from c/e guild as I saw you are working on a page which was submitted much later than I did. Pls, edit this page next as its not too long. It should be stable when I nominate it again. So, pls do it in the coming week of new year. Thank you for your great help

—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 03:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries; I'll c/e it if and when it reaches the top of the GOCE queue as it's only fair to work on the oldest requests first. Waiting time is currently about one month - but there's a drive in January so it's possible that someone will grab it first. Cheers and Happy New Year, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I hope so. Happy New Year to you too.—<font size="2" face="Times New Roman" color="DeepPink"> PKS: <font color="Green">1142  · <font color="DarkViolet">(TALK) 19:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

GOCE Hall of Fame
Hi Baffle gab1978. Torchiest, Dianna and I all think that your wonderful contribution of 116 copy edits from the GOCE Requests page during this year deserves recognition in the GOCE Hall of Fame. I am just now updating the banner. Please feel free to transclude anywhere you like in your userspace. Thanks for all your work, and Happy New Year. Simon. --Stfg (talk) 11:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Awww thank you all... we'll tackle that backlog together ;-) and Happy New Year to you all too. :-) Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

HNY
Wishing everyone a Happy New Year; thanks for your excellent work and encouragement in 2012 and earlier - and may 2013 see you all healthier, wealthier and wiser. Cheers all, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Hey Baffle!

Thanks for the excellent work on Sheriff Hill. I wouldn't interrupt normally but a very happy new year to you, Sir! Meetthefeebles (talk) 23:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hiya, thanks for dropping by; Happy New Year to you too, and no worries. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Once again (and now that it is completed) a huge thanks for the work done on this article which is now much better as a result. Meetthefeebles (talk) 23:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and no worries - it's an interesting article and I enjoyed working on it. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)