User talk:Bagrat007

Welcome!
Hello, Bagrat007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr. Curtis J. Wagner, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Curtis J. Wagner


A tag has been placed on Dr. Curtis J. Wagner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Curtis J. Wagner


A tag has been placed on Dr. Curtis J. Wagner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 4twenty42o (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Curtis J. Wagner


A tag has been placed on Dr. Curtis J. Wagner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peridon (talk) 18:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright
I'm afraid the whole thing would need rewriting as it's been copied from the practice website. I've retagged the speedy deletion. Anything published is copyright, except for certain things, like old works like Charles Dickens, or certain mostly US government departments, or things placed in the public domain by their author). Now Wikipedia is copyright too - every contributor's work is their copyright. However, by clicking 'Save', we grant a licence under CC-BY-SA so that anyone anywhere can use the work. The practice's text is not licensed, and cannot be used here. For more, see WP:COPYVIO. The earlier deletion was for lack of asserted significance. If you think of trying again, read WP:BIO and WP:RS (reliable independent sources - needed to prove the notability). If you can produce the references (and please avoid the scribd one - it's an unpublished book BY the subject and not independent, and the HealthGrades one is just a directory listing - not real independent coverage).
 * And the spsboca ones aren't independent of the subject either - sorry. With both bio of a living person and copyright, we have legal things to be very careful about. Peridon (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

So please tell me if I can paraphrase what is written in the given link and put it under my name in wikipedia? What else should i do to get this article online in wikipedia? Thanks Bagrat Shakhulyan
 * Rewrite rather than paraphrase. Keep well away from the original, and get the references. See above for the two policies (BIO and RS) that you must comply with. Do it at User:Bagrat007/DRAFT (just click that and save it), and when you think your ready, ask for advice. It should be safe there so long as you keep well away from the original, and don't sound like you're promoting the doctor. See WP:NPOV about neutral point of view. Over to you. Peridon (talk) 20:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)