User talk:Bagusk60

April 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Major League Soccer does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I notice you have repeatedly made the same change to the Major League Soccer article Walter Görlitz mentions. Please be aware that Wikipedia policy prohibits a user from engaging in what are called "edit wars" by undoing another user's edit—or by repeatedly reinstating the same edit with no reason for doing so after others have removed it for legitimate reasons—more than three times in a single 24-hour period. (I’ve probably oversimplified this to the point where my explanation may not be 100 percent accurate.) I highly recommend you review the policy at WP:3RR before you continue making the same change over and over again. 1995hoo (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)



Your recent editing history at Major League Soccer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 1995hoo (talk) 00:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Summer Olympic Games—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Winter Olympic Games. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Major League Soccer, you may be blocked from editing.  Sounder Bruce  07:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Major League Soccer
You don't seem to understand how the league operates. It was initially sanctioned by the governing body for the sport in the United States: United States Soccer Federation. While there are three teams that are located in Canada, they participate in the league under the authority of USSF, and are not "supported" by USSF. Soccer Canada has nothing to do with running or administering the league. It is similar to they way that Monaco plays in the French first division and teams from outside of England play in the English first division. The themplate, Infobox football league allows for this and it's clear that the  parameter is to represent the "country whose national association administers the league". The  parameter is to be used "when teams that are based ... outside the host country participate, regardless of what national association they are part of, the country/ies in which such clubs are based is noted here." That was added specifically for MLS and the situations I referenced above. The infobox and lede were written correctly before you started to edit war (and get blocked for doing so) and I suggest you either discuss the issue or stop editing the page incorrectly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Major League Soccer
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at WP:AIV. Please ensure that your edits have received consensus on the talk page before changing the article again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to COVID-19 pandemic—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to COVID-19 pandemic. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * When you repeatedly make a change to an article and it is repeatedly reverted, you *stop*. If you really think your change is an improvement, you should start a discussion at the article talk page and seek a consensus. I have kept the current block short as you are still a relative newcomer here, but if you edit war further when this block expires you should expect to face escalating blocks. Please read WP:EW before you resume editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Summer Olympic Games, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. RuiyuShen 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Winter Olympic Games.   David Biddulph (talk) 09:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Winter Olympic Games. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 15:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)