User talk:Bah Black Sheep

Edit warring on Impact Wrestling
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -  Galatz Talk  16:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Galatz Talk  16:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 00:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC) The user is now using IPs as a method of block evasion here. -  Galatz Talk  12:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Are you saying I’m using a different IP or someone else?

February 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring, as you did at Impact Wrestling. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

2 weeks ip blocking
How about we block this other guy for 2 weeks as well. His source was a title of a article that’s not a source at all in fact the actor and the title wasn’t even related. Bah Black Sheep (talk) 00:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Making the same edits at Impact Wrestling that got you blocked in the first place is guaranteed to get you blocked again. Don't be foolish. oknazevad (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

👍🏾
👍🏾 Bah Black Sheep (talk) 18:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 18:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Blocked?
The person editing this page a complete hater and obviously a MARK for ROH. They put in a article favoriting what they are putting down and when I did it it got deleted. Just nothing past problems in Impacts history as if ROH doesn’t have problems they are a Indy company. It’s pretty clear y’all ass some haters So ok block me I’m just gonna put the same thing whenever I’m free of this suspension and I’ll be encouraging other to fix this page aswell. -See ya in a month. Bah Black Sheep (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Abequinn14. I noticed that in this edit to Ring of Honor, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#124; abequinnfourteen 21:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)