User talk:BahamaLlama8

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there BahamaLlama8, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User talk:BahamaLlama8. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

A page you started (2013–14 Florida Gulf Coast Eagles men's basketball team) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2013–14 Florida Gulf Coast Eagles men's basketball team, BahamaLlama8!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The page is reivewed."

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

NFCC re-additions
Please revert yourself, the files that you added back violate WP:NFC #14. Werieth (talk) 13:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for referring exactly what number you believe applies. I believe it should remain because the image is to illustrate the overall athletic program at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) and as a unifying element on pages devoted to individual FGCU athletic team articles, allowing for rapid and accurate assessment of the article's topic. Additionally it is a team / corporate logo, which is also acceptable. Can you discuss why I'm incorrect here? BahamaLlama8 (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Each year of a football team qualifies as a perennial event. UUI#14 prohibits usage on those articles A logo of a perennial event (or of its sponsoring company), used to illustrate an article about a specific instance of that event Its a matter of minimizing non-free content. Werieth (talk) 13:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I see now. Thanks for the explanation - it's greatly appreciated. I'll work to find a free alternative. BahamaLlama8 (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Good catch.
I should have added the injury symbol to Taylor myself.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem at all! I suppose that's the major benefit to a wiki - everyone can help. BahamaLlama8 (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Exactly. (and welcome) -- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your use of the "minor" edit option
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jrcla2 (talk) 02:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll keep a closer eye on that for next time. BahamaLlama8 (talk) 02:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Use of the "minor" box
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback! Was there a particular edit you thought would be a good to categorize as non-minor? BahamaLlama8 (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem. These are examples of non-minor edits that you marked as minor:, , , , . Jrcla2 (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree - that first link should have excluded the minor indicator. The others I would categorize under "indisputable" because they are roster / schedule updates for a sports team. I'll think twice before marking. Thanks again. BahamaLlama8 (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I took an even closer look and noticed the norm appears to be non-minor when adding schedules. I'll change my methodology immediately. BahamaLlama8 (talk) 23:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)