User talk:Bahiagrass

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page A Flock of Seagulls has been reverted. Your edit here to A Flock of Seagulls was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/seagullsrunning) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ascension (A Flock of Seagulls Album)


Hello, Bahiagrass. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ascension".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Spoons newdaynewworld.webp
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Zeebratta mikescore.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dance Hall Days, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Chung ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dance_Hall_Days check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dance_Hall_Days?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

An appreciation for your work

 * Thank you for the honorary spoon and the kind words!! I greatly appreciate it. Keep on listenin'! Bahiagrass (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Racing After Midnight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDonald ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Racing_After_Midnight check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Racing_After_Midnight?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Specials discography
Hi. I noticed that you removed the history section that was added to the The Specials discography page.

The intent of the section was to meet the note at the top of the page: ''This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page. (November 2009)''

Summarising the many many iterations of the group, and what is notable about such a 'messy' discography is required for a discography page, particularly this group. Most band discographies summarise the contents in more depth than a numbered list. Chadwholovedme (talk) 03:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, at the time, I removed the section because I didn't think it talked about the discography much, but rather it was more of a summary of line-ups and information that could be found on the main article (compared it to other discography summaries). You are free to add the section back to the article, but I believe it would be better if certifications, chart positions, and receptions were discussed more instead of line-up changes. Bahiagrass (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)