User talk:BaileighD

July 2021
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 22:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please also review our policy on reliable sources. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 22:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello BaileighD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BaileighD. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 17:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I’m not being paid for anything. I’m just an animal lover who discovered Wikipedia. I want to provide more information about animal charities and cruelty-free & vegan brands. That is my goal here. BaileighD (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mardi Paws (July 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mardi Paws and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mardi Paws, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mardi Paws (July 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mardi Paws and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mardi Paws, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OFRA Cosmetics (July 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OFRA Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OFRA Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OFRA_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OFRA_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

I have weeded out promotional sources (which I didn’t realize was promotional Bc they mentioned a product, so I do apologize for that). I have also added a controversy sections and reworded any fluff. Please let me know if I missed anything. Thank your for your feedback. BaileighD (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mardi Paws (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Clearfrienda were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mardi Paws and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mardi Paws, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clearfrienda&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mardi_Paws reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend  a  💬 02:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi BaileighD! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Adding new information, or adding sources to an article shouldd never be marked as a minor edit. Alex (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh! Thank you for the info! I'll edit accordingly going forward!

Your submission at Articles for creation: OFRA Cosmetics (July 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OFRA Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OFRA Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OFRA_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HighKing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OFRA_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 HighKing++ 20:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (July 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 10:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mardi Paws has been accepted
 Mardi Paws, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Mardi_Paws help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Doric Loon (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Ofra Cosmetics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ofra Cosmetics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. The draft also reads like an advertisement, which is not acceptable. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 17:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I’ve actually worked with 2 live editors who went through sentence by sentence to help me write it, so I’m not sure how it reads as an advertisement? Especially considering there is a reliable 3rd party new source that paints the company in an extremely negative light. Not only do I have that source, but I also have 2 scholarly articles, one was published in Taiwan about their business model and the other was published by a PhD who is a department head of a business college who did and in-depth analysis of their rebrand and choice to put their products in ULTA. Additionally, there’s a news article that discusses in depth the beginning of the company as well as the founders background. Along with all of those sources, there are more independent reliable sources that talk about the companies collaborations, charity efforts, and cruelty free platform. Plus, like I said I worked with 2 live editors who greatly refined this article for me, so I’m not sure how I met their standards and not yours. Please advise. Thanks. BaileighD (talk) 02:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I don’t know how it’s promotional by simply stating that have collaborated with influencers as part of their business models. Many other pages on here talk about collaborations with influencers and celebrities. Additionally, I have 2 sources that talk about the political stuff the company has been involved in, so I’m still confused about what you’re talking about. Since I have worked with other Wikipedia live reviewers to structure this page, I'm not sure how else to change the tone. Can you please give me some specifics? BaileighD (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (July 26)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Nightenbelle was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is the 5th time the article has been submitted as a promotional piece, author has not fixed the problems, and is resubmitting too quickly without substantial fixes, thus- author is here solely for promotional purposes, not to build an encyclopedia and is wasting the time and resources of reviewers which should be spent on editors who are trying to improve this encyclopedia, not just promote a company.

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

You have stated repeatedly that you have worked with "live editors". Where? There is no discussion on your talk page or on the article talk page? I reviewed the other article you created- it too is blantantly promotional. I don't know whether you are being paid or just not understanding the difference between a fan page and an encyclopedia article, but I strongly recomend you spend some time reviewing the WP:MOS and other WP articles to see what WP:NPOV means before you try again. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

I used this link with the Live help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IRC_help_disclaimer

And I did go in and make changes each time I submitted. I changed wording, removed sources, and added really good sources. This is not promotional; I simply want to add information to Wikipedia about animal rights organizations and cruelty free brands. I’ve asked for specific feedback where I have been promotional, but have not gotten any feedback other than “you’re being promotional,” which I’m not trying to be. Especially since, like I said, I had 2 different people on the “live help” assist me with my tone and sources. So please advise with specific examples I can improve. BaileighD (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * THis is promotional. Each rejection has given you links in the rejection of articles to read- you have not done so. You want someone to fix it for you, but you need to do the work, read WP:NPOV WP:COI WP:NOT and all the other policies and WP:MOS before you create another article. The live help may have fixed one or two sentences- but the entire article is filled with phrases that belong on the company website or in a PR release- you need to edit out all the fluff- all the things that are just there because it sounds good but is not actually interest to people who have never heard of the company and just want a quick "who the heck is this" from us. You don't need to sell how great this company is- you need to just describe the facts and important bits. Basically you need to stop being a fan trying to get information out there and become a reporter trying to convey just facts. But seriously- every single time the article has been turned down there have been multiple links to articles you should read. It is your responsibility to read those, not our responsibility to copy and past the info in those articles to your talk page or go through and list every one of the dozens (and there are DOZENS) of weasle words and promotional phrases and list them for you. You need to change more than 1 or 2 words- you need to re-write almost the entire article. AND- you need to add a criticism / controversy section- because this company has had negative attention and you are ignoring it, which adds to the theory that you are a paid contributor for them. Nightenbelle (talk) 19:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (July 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clearfrienda&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend  a  💬  11:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (July 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clearfrienda&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend  a  💬  11:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics (August 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofra Cosmetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sahaib3005&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ofra_Cosmetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofra Cosmetics has been accepted
 Ofra Cosmetics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ofra_Cosmetics help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PETA’s Cruelty-Free Bunny Logos.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:PETA’s Cruelty-Free Bunny Logos.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PETA&#39;s Beauty Without Bunnies Certification.png
Thanks for uploading File:PETA&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ofra Cosmetics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ofra Cosmetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ofra Cosmetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Beau Hart moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Beau Hart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Hart (December 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Hart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beau Hart, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Hart (March 16)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Hart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beau Hart, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 15:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Laconiko moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Laconiko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello BaileighD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BaileighD. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 15:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi! I'm not being paid or compensated by anyone. For the past year or so I've been working on my article skills because the concept of Wikipedia is awesome! I just don't always have time to work on as many articles or edits as i would like with work and going back to school. Please let me know how I can further improve this article; it was published awhile ago and edited by an editor, so I was surprised to see it was taken down. Thank you for your time! BaileighD (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laconiko (March 17)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laconiko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laconiko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laconiko Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusalkii&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laconiko reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 01:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the advice! Should I have an "Awards" section at all? Or should I include it in a different section? BaileighD (talk) 15:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Laconiko Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Laconiko Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Laconiko moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Laconiko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I have many reliable independent sources such as Olive Oil Times, TomosNews, ALO Magazine, Huffington Post, and even Forbes? Can you please tell me how I can get more notable and reliable than that? BaileighD (talk) 22:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Beau Hart moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Beau Hart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crescent City (book series)


A tag has been placed on Crescent City (book series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  00:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I moved it to draft space so I could continue to work on it? BaileighD (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, and you did not nominate the redirect left behind for deletion, so I did, that is what the message I left you was about. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  23:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * OH gotcha thank you! Sorry, I'm kinda new to Wikipedia article writing! I've been trying to up my skills for like a year, but it's super hard to find the time, so I don't know all of the little details like that! Thank you again! BaileighD (talk) 14:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laconiko has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Laconiko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Laconiko help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Missvain (talk) 03:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Hart (July 22)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Hart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beau_Hart reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 05:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Crescent City (book series)
Hello, BaileighD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crescent City (book series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Crescent City (book series)


Hello, BaileighD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Crescent City".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Beau Hart
Hello, BaileighD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beau Hart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beau Hart


Hello, BaileighD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beau Hart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hemmings Motor News Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Hemmings Motor News Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)