User talk:Baileja

July 2008

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Hairsquare (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chuck norris has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chuck norris. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 22:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chuck norris. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 23:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "The most powerful man alive"
A page you created, The most powerful man alive, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. WadeSimMiser (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jami Bailey
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jami Bailey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Inappropriate redirect. Jami Bailey, apparently, was merely one of many past opponents of Norris. It is not an alternate name for him.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tim Ross  (talk)  01:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)