User talk:Bailey2016

February 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wayne Smith (Texas politician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   15:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 General Ization  Talk   15:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne Smith (Texas politician). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne Smith (Texas politician), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne Smith (Texas politician).  General Ization  Talk   16:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Wayne Smith (Texas politician). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Scr ★ pIron IV 16:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. If the sockpuppet investigation determines that you are abusing alternative accounts, you should expect this block to be raised to indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)