User talk:Baileybobfam

Proposed deletion of IOC re-analysis programme


The article IOC re-analysis programme has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable programme. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Sochi 2014
Hey! I'd like to talk about the 2014 Winter Olympics article. It seems that it has been attacked by users with some sort of agenda. Unfortunately, my account isn't auto-confirmed and I can't tackle it. Could you asses these edits: and. The second example depicts him considering proven doping cases to be "alleged". I also urge you to remove the information about the pre-Games controversies and really old assessments dated back to 2014.

This paragraph should be removed:

A total of 98 events in 15 winter sport disciplines were held during the Games. A number of new competitions—a total of 12 accounting for gender—were held during the Games, including biathlon mixed relay, women's ski jumping, mixed-team figure skating, mixed-team luge, half-pipe skiing, ski and snowboard slopestyle, and snowboard parallel slalom. The events were held around two clusters of new venues: an Olympic Park constructed in Sochi's Imeretinsky Valley on the coast of the Black Sea, with Fisht Olympic Stadium, and the Games' indoor venues located within walking distance, and snow events in the resort settlement of Krasnaya Polyana. The lead-up to these Games were marked by several major controversies, including major cost overruns alleged to have been the result of corruption (at a budget of US$51 billion, they were the most expensive Olympics in history), concerns for the safety of LGBT athletes and spectators due to recent government actions, protests by ethnic Circassian activists over use of a site where they believe a genocide took place in the 19th century, and threats by jihadist groups tied to the insurgency in the North Caucasus. However, immediately following the closing ceremony, commentators evaluated the Games to have been successful overall.[4][5] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djdisiwk78 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from several articles to List of demolished buildings and structures in London (you have since removed the addition). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:47, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

operation thunder
hello there, you added this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal&diff=prev&oldid=863869930 I searched for it and found nothing, can you help me with a link to the details, thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

this is the link: https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/info/100003/community_and_living/1159/convictions_for_child_sexual_exploitation/4 showing that operation thunder and clover worked side by side.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1812 Baltimore riots has been accepted
 1812 Baltimore riots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=1812_Baltimore_riots help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Grooming gangs
There is no article on wikipedia about, "Grooming gangs" in the UK, although there is an article on the Huddersfield grooming gang. Please create one if you can make time for it. Thanks (to start with, this may help)! 2406:7400:98:E249:AEC3:3AFF:FE2C:9622 (talk) 17:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * may help if you request him (I don't have the time).-2406:7400:98:E249:AEC3:3AFF:FE2C:9622 (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)