User talk:Bailmoney27/Archive 1

Construction
When will it be put up again? Zheliel (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * okay... its not under construction.  Now .Zheliel (talk) 11:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Secaucus, New Jersey
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Secaucus, New Jersey, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Recent Edit
Hello-

My name is Eric Kauffman and my name was being used erroneously on the KZIQ-FM page. I tried to remove it but it was overruled. I know the station is now a Hot AC station and does not have any of the programming listed with my name. Also it is not being operated by me and my wife (Kim Kauffman). We have a new station and I look forward to creating a page for that one.

Thank you!!

Desertdawg937 (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Desertdawg937

Atlantic College page edit
Hi, BillGates27. I wanted to let you know that you did make a mistake in undoing my edits to the Atlantic College page as it was, in fact, constructive. I deleted traditions which no longer exist e.g. writer in residence and added those which do e.g. showerings and end of codes. I'd appreciate if you changed it back to my edited version. Thanks!Michael.R.Manning (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

pling toys
Hi - can you let me know what the issue is with placing an external link to Pling toys on the Bett page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BETT

I planned to explain what Pling toys is as well.

AintEasy (talk) 03:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I reverted a similar edit and it seemed like advertising to me. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 03:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk:List of UFC events
Is there a personal attack template with twitter? ? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Not 100% sure. What are you referring to? Bailmoney27 (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Users attacking other editors (such as what was done on your user page and Talk:List of UFC events are best warned with Template:Uw-npa1 rather than templage:uw-vand1. Lets a blocking admin know what's going on. Nothing major. Thanks for minding the fort! Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Oop, sorry. I'm kind of new to this whole Wikipedia moderating thing. Thanks for the heads-up! Bailmoney27 (talk) 08:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Please remove!
I am Tony's daughter. I don't know who created this page obviously does not know him. The photo is insulting. The desciption of his occupation is also incredibly insulting. Whoever wrote it picked out a fragment of his life whilst in the Footlights and non of his real achievments or life history. Is there any way this can be removed?? if we wanted a wiki page on him it would be done by someone who knows him or by himself, rather than a simplistic and frankly insulting page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modernartdiva (talk • contribs) 20:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your concern. The content on Tony Buffery meets the requirements for biographies on Wikipedia; it holds a neutral point of view, is verifiable, and contains no original research. The content you created on the article contained original research that was not verified with sources or references of any sort. If you would like to add information to the article, please provide trusted, verifiable sources and ensure that the article maintains a neutral point of view. If you request help, please place the template on your talk page, followed by your question. Bailmoney27 (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * As I said in the previous message the photo and occupation description is incorrect and insulting. The information given is not complete. I am not computer literate, and have no real passion to become so...all I am asking is that this page is removed because as it is, it is insulting to him and his family. I tried to change aspects to make it more honest but as you know this did not work. replies like the one you just gave me is not helpful....I am really not interested enough or have enough respect in this site to rewrite the article....however i am requesting that it is removed asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modernartdiva (talk • contribs) 21:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I see no reason to delete this article as it does not violate any policies of Wikipedia. However, I will bring it to an administrator's attention. Bailmoney27 (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Looking at the article as an uninvolved editor, I agree with Bailmoney. There is absolutely no reason for the article to be deleted, as it is sourced properly.  For information, please see information about what a reliable source is.


 * Modernartdiva, if you have serious concerns about the article, you can reach other volunteers at info-en-q@wikimedia.org. These volunteers are experienced at working with BLP subjects, and they can work with you to address your concerns.


 * Thank you for being willing to work with people to address your concerns. I hope everything gets sorted out.  Feel free to leave me a note with any other questions, or add another helpme tag. ~  Matthewrbowker  Make a comment! 23:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Question regarding above article
Could I get an editor's opinion on the article mentioned in the above thread, Tony Buffery? As far as I can see, there is no reason for this article to be deleted or rewritten. Bailmoney27 (talk) 21:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I've commented. Excellent job on your comments, they were very well worded. ~  Matthewrbowker  Make a comment! 23:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: The Adventures of LiLi and Zambo
Hello Bailmoney27. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on The Adventures of LiLi and Zambo to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Sir I belive that Mercs inc was cancelled because it's was announced almost 4 and a half years ago and that's devolpment hell in my opinion it is In my opinion that the game was cancelled — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesbondfanforever (talk • contribs) 02:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Porta Hotel Antigua
what should I do to publish the correction that I made to the Porta Hotel Antigua's page in Wikipedia? the actual is really poor and is not true because the hotel does have more than 77 rooms and I would like to add more information. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anajutoledo6 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Your edits to Porta Hotel Antigua included original research which is against Wikipedia's editing policies. Please back up your additions by using trusted, reliable sources and confirm that your additions are verifiable. If you are editing on behalf of the hotel, please note that this is strongly discouraged as it represents a conflict of interest. You may not cite yourself for any reason. Bailmoney27 (talk) 03:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Lauravecch
I was a little concerned at how you dealt with the edits of this new user. First, it is difficult to see how removing a speedy deletion tag constitutes vandalism, as you implied through your use of Twinkle. It is against policy, but that does not make it vandalism. Secondly, I don't understand why you used a level 3 warning for a "first offence". That is what Level 1 warnings are for. Please consider WP:BITE when dealing with these types of edits. Having said that, thanks for your vandal-fighting work. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

List of NYU School of Medicine people
I added a new alumnus, please help format the refs. Thanks.--Polochicken (talk) 06:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above looks like another sock account of Mangoeater1000. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 06:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Wouldn't have caught that without you pointing it out. The incident has been reported. Bailmoney27 (talk) 06:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * And the account is already blocked. I probably wouldn't have caught it either if I hadn't been watching his edits yesterday. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 07:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll probably keep an eye on that article from now on. Seems he's had at least eight different accounts that he's trying to use. Bailmoney27 (talk) 07:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Just for heads-up, the IP 76.102.49.177 was blocked because of disruptive editing and then it was found to be a sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigations/Iamthemuffinman--Klskid (talk) 22:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * IP 76.102.49.177 was blocked for making two re-insertion reverts of COPYVIO material on the article VLC Media Player, but the SPI was inconclusive and the IP may be blameless in that regard. However, Klskid was determined to be yet another sock puppet of Mangoeater1000.  Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm still confused as to why IP 76.102.49.177 was banned. It seems like they were too strict and acted too quickly on the matter. Bailmoney27 (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * It's actually a block, not a ban, for a 1-week period, coming one month after a prior 24-hour block for edit warring. It may be overturned shortly after the blocking admin returns to re-examine the evidence, based on the conversations taking place on the IP's talk page.  Assuming good faith, it appears the IP didn't realize the material was copyrighted.  Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 05:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Clarification ?
Hi Bailmoney27. I noticed you warned Pupu1234 about adding promotional material to Wikipedia's main page's talk page. Just so I have a better understanding of how things work, is there a reason you didn't warn Shashicsp and KatelynMajor for similar violations? Thanks. Robvanvee (talk) 08:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi there! I haven't been monitoring that Talk page recently. Mostly what I do is monitor the first 250 new users on the User creation log and verify that their edits are valid and that they are not promotional or vandalism-only accounts. If you do see promotional material on the Talk page, feel free to revert it and warn the user. (A good tool to use for this is Twinkle.) Let me know if you have any more questions. Bailmoney27 (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Robvanvee (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Andrea Figallo, 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Andrea Figallo, 2013.jpg, which you've sourced to http://wiseguys.de/pressegalerie/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wise Guys group photo 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wise Guys group photo 2013.jpg, which you've sourced to http://wiseguys.de/pressegalerie/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Treehouse logo, blue.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Treehouse logo, blue.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Roads in Ireland
Hi,

I changed the name of the Country from Republic of Ireland to Ireland because that is the name of the state. Republic of Ireland is only a description, see here,,, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Ireland

thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loewiki (talk • contribs) 22:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello. The article you are changing is already correct without revision. It states that the island of Ireland is comprised of the countries of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. You are changing it to say the island is comprised of a country and the island itself. Hope this explains why we're reverting the edit. Bail money 27   talk  22:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hi Bailmoney. Please see WP:DTR and make sure you're using the right kind of notice template if you decide to use one, since my edit was clearly not a test. In any case, I had replaced the template in the Ben Sherman article because most articles about fashion labels already use Template:Infobox company and just four other pages were using the Fashion Label infobox. I thought this was uncontroversial, but since you seem to oppose this change it might be better to discuss the matter at TfD.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Tammy and Sandie
I wrote Spartan School for Tammy(Editor Gerry Finley-Day)and Slave of the Trapeze for Sandie(Editor John Wagner)in the early 1970s. I worked on various comics editorially and as writer: War Picture Library, TV Tornado, June & School Friend, Tiger & Scorcher, Battle plus others. I knew virtually all in comics at Fleetway and IPC Terence Magee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terencemagee (talk • contribs) 17:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, please note that Wikipedia has a manual of style by which to abide. We also do not allow original research; please cite your sources if you wish to make an edit. Bail money 27   talk  17:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

odulic
Sir, thank you for your advice. I'll follow recommended instructions next time. best, odulic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odulic (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Written English
You write, "I may use British English, but I'm Amurican. I have my reasons for using British English though. Feel free to ask me." Well ... I'm asking. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; — 21:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC) — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; — 22:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC) — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; — 22:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC) — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; — 15:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hm, you're the first one to ask. Well, I studied in an international school in Germany for quite some time and British English was used in our classes (as is the norm in the European Union). Guess I picked it up there and it just stuck with me. Wish I could have a better answer for you! Bailmoney27   talk  21:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, that is an excellent explanation, but doesn't it get you into problems now you are in the US?
 * I try to avoid it in written communications for work. I set my Pages spellcheck to American so it corrects it for me, but in just casual conversation, people don't really notice or they just ignore it. So I try to keep important things in American English as best I can. Sometimes I slip. Bailmoney27   talk  22:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Good luck with your Stiki application! Cheers!
 * I knew you would be successful.
 * Haha, thanks! Kinda surprising I was denied rollback permissions but was granted STiki permissions with the note that I'd probably get rollback. Regardless, I've had quite a spike in efficiency, I would say. Bailmoney27   talk  15:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Why?
The article has always used British English - please be more careful. Johnbod (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Whoops! Sorry about that. Before reverting the edit, I referred to the wrong article open in my browser - rest assured that won't happen again. Thanks for taking the time to point out my mistake. Cheers! Bailmoney27   talk  16:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. Johnbod (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hello, I was very impressed by the work that you did to improve the Innovation Middle School page, and I am pleased to announce that I will soon be able to speak with the school's principal! Although this may not concern you, if I do make some flaws or mistakes that I don't know how to fix, you are my first choice! Thank you! Kurtisawesome01 19:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtisawesome01 (talk • contribs)

SHE'S NIGERIAN
Please don;t bully over the internet. I don't have the time.... monster.com might be useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WriterWoman1 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm really not sure how that constitutes bullying. I removed a good faith edit that you made because she is, in fact, American; she was born in Boston, Massachusetts. Just because she is of Nigerian extraction does not mean she is not American. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Bailmoney27   talk  04:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

multiple accounts
I created user seattlehempfest then got a notice that it violated TOS and to create a new one, so I did. I'm not trying to do something wrong, I'm trying to comply. I'm fine w/either user name, I was just following the instructions I was given to not use my company's name as my user name. help I'm confused now!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharonwhitson (talk • contribs) 02:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there! When a group contributes to Wikipedia with information about themselves, or "when advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest." Wikipedia discourages editing in the interests of the editor. Please also note that multiple user accounts are not allowed on Wikipedia, and this is primarily why I have opened the sockpuppet investigation. Even though your username issue has been "resolved", I believe that you still stand in a conflict of interest. Bailmoney27   talk  02:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

multiple accounts continued
how do i delete the first account I created? How is adding current info advancing outside interests? it's keeping the page up to date, it was very outdated. Sharonwhitson (talk) 02:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Because you are editing on behalf of the organisation that puts together Seattle Hempfest, this creates a conflict of interest. Where you saw the instruction to create a new username, you should have also noted the following: "You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose." The first account has already been barred from editing, so don't worry about that. Just keep in mind that if you represent the organisation, you should not edit on behalf of that organisation. Bailmoney27   talk  03:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi Bailmoney27, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, spam and blatantly unconstructive edits; using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 09:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Winx Club 3D: Magical Adventure
Look at the edit history and the nonsense being added by the IP editor. Both myself and BB are reverting this.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have warned the IP editor as well and am looking even deeper into the situation. This seems like a ridiculous page for all editors involved on which to be edit warring. Bailmoney27   talk  17:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * All pages are ridiculous for edit warring. Now carry on with your investigation.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

108.32.42.70 and North Hills School District
This account seems to be vandalizing this page again. I can keep reverting it, but I'd rather not get involved in anything that resembles an edit war. Lou Sander (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've warned the user on their talk page. Just report them to an administrator if it happens once more. Bailmoney27   talk  19:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello dear Bailmoney27.

You've made a mistake at WInx Club Magical Adventure. The movie take place in the middle of Season4. For two reasons. Reason 1: Nabu died in 24th episode of Season 4 and in the movie he is still alive... In Season 5 Episode 7 was confrimed that nabus is death. Reason 2. Iginio said in an interview that the movie takes place in the middel of Season 4. Hope you understand it now WinxClubStella321 (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please provide a citation for this material. If you add uncited material on a page, the edit will be reverted in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Thanks for your understanding and feel free to ask me any questions you might have. Bailmoney27   talk  17:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Note that Editor Review has been retired
Hi, Bailmoney27: this is a notice that after a MfD and two RfCs, the Editor Review process has been officially retired. You should not expect further comments on your open Editor Review, which will be archived soon. In the coming weeks there may be information available on alternative processes that you can pursue if you so desire. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 21:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Treehouse logo transparent.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Treehouse logo transparent.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:The Gardens at Market Square 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Gardens at Market Square 2013.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

LeEco
LeEco have no parent/subsidiary relationship with LeTV (aka le.com). I don't think removing removing native language ref and name of the subsidiary would actually "help" the article. As wikipedia had lists of Intel product, it looks appropriate to keep a list of mobile phone of LeEco. Matthew_hk  t  c  04:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey Matthew, thank you for getting in touch. A few key points I want to point out: (1) I'll fix the LeTV / Le.com confusion there. I misunderstood while reading some articles in both Chinese and English. Thanks for the heads up! (2) I think you're right about the table of mobile phones, I want to clean it up a little bit and insert it under the LeMobile section. (3) I don't believe the native Chinese names are necessary on the English Wikipedia for every subsidiary, as I feel this is too much information that isn't relevant to English-speaking users. I've removed them for this reason. Thanks for the feedback, and feel free to ask or contribute any more information! Bailmoney27   talk  04:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * It is a wide practice that the private company that was owned by the largest shareholder of the public company, abuse to use the brand name of the public company to aid the private business, keeping the native name at least help bilingual user to tract record which company the subsidiary actually belong to, or which product referring to which company. (More example: It look crazy for Sinopharm to have six listed subsidiary isn't it? Mitsubishi in Japan were actually Keiretsu) The native name ideally should be used in the subsidiary's own article (on its lead), but since there is none, it is better to keep there as LeMobile isn't one to one translation of, but rather a trading name or unofficial translation by the press. Matthew_hk   t  c  04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Take a look at the latest revision and let me know what you think. I edited the names to translate smoother without the full legal name of the subsidiary, but rather the shortened version most commonly used. Bailmoney27   talk  04:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: US Mobile (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:US Mobile and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M assiveYR  ♠  08:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: US Mobile (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:US Mobile and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M assiveYR  ♠  08:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * : Bailmoney27   talk

to
 * : Bailmoney27 talk

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New Budget Logo, December 2012.png
Thanks for uploading File:New Budget Logo, December 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:First Saab 9-3 pre-production vehicle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:First Saab 9-3 pre-production vehicle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Xuzhou Metro, logo revision 2019.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:La Roche College, new logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:La Roche College, new logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:NEVS AB logo.png


The file File:NEVS AB logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xuzhou Metro, logo revision 2019.png
Thanks for uploading File:Xuzhou Metro, logo revision 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)