User talk:Baiter

Hi! While I appreciate your polite words on my talk page, the fact remains that "Cloud Starchaser" breaks several rules of inclusion. It is, however, the perfect sort of article for Uncyclopedia, an extremely funny, almost-anything-goes parody of Wikipedia...and yes, I'm a member. It's one of the funniest sites on the Internet and I think your article would be a good fit. Everything2 and Wikigeeks are good choices as well. Hope this helps; sorry the news isn't better. - Lucky 6.9 07:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your help. What rules of inclusion does the article break?

Those of notability. Since it's not terribly well known, few if any folks outside the article's sphere of influence are highly unlikely to come looking for it. WP:NOT might be of some help to you. Your contributions really are appreciated, by the way. - Lucky 6.9 23:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar and the kind words. Do you know Hank? BTW, I figured out the signature thing. Her sig was really complicated and the code didn't look like a signature at first glance. Also, did you mean to delete the earlier comments you made on my talk page? I was going to put them back on, but I wanted to make sure you didn't get rid of them for a reason. The Ungovernable   Force  05:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The article Intopia has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 00:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chickipedia
A tag has been placed on Chickipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 04:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Xyience"
A page you created, Xyience, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Andrew Nellis
Sure it's possible, and it's possible his profile may increase to the point he is notable enough to have an article if that isn't the case now. I wasn't involved in the AFD before, I really don't know what their arguments were for and against the article at the time. TastyCakes (talk) 06:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ah, here is the deletion discussion. TastyCakes (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)