User talk:Bakery95

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Liam Haley
A tag has been placed on Liam Haley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Teapot  george Talk  13:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liam Haley


The article Liam Haley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability: I can find no evidence to support the claims made in the article, which is unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beckfoot School, you will be blocked from editing.  Teapot  george Talk  13:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

re Liam Haley
Because it did not assert notability, did not contain any sources, and clearly doesn't belong on Wikipedia. --Golbez (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Beckfoot School. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Teapot  george Talk  20:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I would just like to say that this deletion wasn't fair, correct, or right. Sir Toby Walkland is very upset, and feels that he should be recognised for his achievments in music. I would also like to point out that the user, I dream of horses, apart from having a deeply innapropriate name, has a page about funny vandalisms on wikipedia, therefore I believe that she is a more appropriate candidate for blocking than me, as I am just trying to show the world the great acheivments of Sir Toby Walkland.

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.