User talk:Balabinrm

Welcome ...
Wikipedia really welcomes technical experts, especially those that will share their insights. But it is worth pointing out that Wikipedia is a a poor mechanism to publicize recent specialized research results, for several reasons. First, the material that you are citing is too specialized for Wikipedia, although it may be very impressive for other specialists. In pentane, we are just tying to explain the basics in context - like any encyclopedia. For this reason, Wikipedia seeks secondary and tertiary sources (books, reviews) except in special cases (discoveries, key procedures). Second, on practical grounds, we cannot reference every paper - J. Phys. Chem. publishes 40,000+ pages/year! Do you think that we should be citing everyone one of these papers? Of course not, they are too many and too specialized. And consider Phys Rev B - it's bigger! So have faith and be patient - wait for your papers to be digested into reviews and books. Maybe you'd care to review the article on Raman Spectroscopy for its clarity? Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome. I have to agree with Smokefoot. On Basis set superposition error, you added a very specialised reference to a paper obviously written by yourself. This comes under the conflict of interest guideline. What you did is not prohibited, but it would have been much better if you had used your specialist knowledge of the subject to add a few general references for the whole concept of basis set superposition error. The article has no references other than yours. Once that is done, adding your specialist reference may be appropriate. Please do this. The article needs your knowledge of the literature. Add references to books and review articles.

Ways to improve Venedikt Yevladov
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Balabinrm, thanks for creating Venedikt Yevladov!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this. Could you please add your references?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much!! )) --Balabinrm (talk) 15:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Book stubs
Hello! Regarding your recently created articles such as The Social and Political Thought of Leon Trotsky, Our Revolution (Trotsky), and Leon Trotsky and the politics of economic isolation, please consider expanding the prose beyond mere assertion of existence and a list of reviews. See Non-fiction article guidelines, and don't be afraid to put a little effort into it. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Trade-union debate (Russia)
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7502/1/twisstm_etd2009.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Trotsky and World War I for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trotsky and World War I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Trotsky and World War I until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  18:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Vincenzo Barone
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Balabinrm, thanks for creating Vincenzo Barone!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please work on this in draftspace and move back when it has clear, WP:INLINECITED references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. --Balabinrm (talk) 21:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kese Alberton
Hello, Balabinrm,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kese Alberton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Kese Alberton.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Natureium (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Martin Hagan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Martin Hagan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 12:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Shankar Bhattacharyya) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Shankar Bhattacharyya.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for contributing this article to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—  Newslinger  talk   17:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Viacheslav Vershinin moved to draftspace
I just reviewed Viacheslav Vershinin, and it doesn't appear to currently meet notability guidelines. I tried looking up his research, but wasn't able to find sufficient highly cited publications to meet WP:NACADEMIC. Alternatively, provide citations to in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources in order to meet WP:GNG. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets notability guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,Rosguill talk 08:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jörg Behler
Thanks for creating Jörg Behler.

A New Page Patroller Ajpolino just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

"Currently the page relies only on sources published by Behler's current employer. Any chance you could find some sources from outside groups? Cheers"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ajpolino (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Silvia Curteanu) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Silvia Curteanu.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 scope_creep Talk  18:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Wanderson Romão) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Wanderson Romão.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 scope_creep Talk  18:53, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viacheslav Vershinin has been accepted
 Viacheslav Vershinin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! K.e.coffman (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Viacheslav_Vershinin help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Ways to improve Nikolay Anisimov
Hello, Balabinrm,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Nikolay Anisimov! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Roman Balabin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Balabin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Roman Balabin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Roman Balabin. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Please also note WP:COI if you edit or create articles about close associates, such as co-authors or research team members. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message: actually, I have a tendency to read the rules before I do anything ) But still, thank you. Balabinrm (talk) 08:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roman Balabin


Hello, Balabinrm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roman Balabin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Martin Hagan concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Martin Hagan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

 * Thanks a lot! И впрямь аппетитная, спасибо ))) Balabinrm (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Viacheslav Vershinin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viacheslav Vershinin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viacheslav Vershinin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tautomers (talk) 20:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)