User talk:Balablitz/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Grand Trunk Express, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil, Marathi and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi DPL bot (talk), thanks for intimating about the issue in time. I was bit unaware. Now it has been fixed. --Balablitz (talk) 09:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks gidonb (talk), barnstars and appreciation like these encourages me to do more. Thank you once again. --Bala(blitz) 08:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arrambam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi DPL bot (talk), the cited issue was fixed. --Balablitz (talk) 07:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Films shot in Trichy
Are you sure these films are shot in Trichy? --     L o g     X    18:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Very sure. --Balablitz (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. But, be more careful on that! --     L o g     X    18:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Definitely.--Balablitz (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vicarious (Company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi DPL bot (talk), the issue has been resolved as Steve Brown mentioned was nowhere in the reference cited for. Mea culpa --Bala(blitz) 17:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC User Bharathidasan University was accepted
 User Bharathidasan University, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bala(blitz) 09:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of User Bharathidasan University


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bgwhite (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

|Work= (or) |Publisher=
Thank you So much for Understanding,

Yeah! what you said is Right :)

Regards,

Raghusri (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vetri Vizha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amala and Apoorva Sagodharargal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Fly
The 2012 Indian film about a man being murdered and reincarnated as a fly was made in Telugu as Eega and in Tamil as Naan Ee. Despite both of them being described as separately shot, Naan Ee redirects to Eega, meaning it does not have its own article. Is it good enough to have its own article though? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear Kailash29792 (talk), am quite confused after your query. There are few examples regarding your query:


 * Nee Manasu Naaku Telusu/Enakku 20 Unakku 18 or TVSK/Something Something - Same story/film, Minor crew change but diff article.
 * Yuva/Aaytha Ezhuthu - Same story/film, Major crew change but diff article.
 * Mayabazar, Neram and Charulatha - Same story/film, Minor crew change but same/single article.
 * KSY/Love Failure and 180/Nootrenbadhu - Same story/film, Minor crew change but redirects to one version.


 * To me, seperate article may be required for remakes, other wise redirect or single/same article is enough if the film has minor crew change and minor re-shoot. Eg: Neram, Chaarulatha, KSY/Love Failure, 180/Nootrenbadhu, etc., For Nee Manasu Naaku Telusu/ Enakku 20 Unakku 18 or TVSK/Something Something, they have minor crew change only otherwise simultaneously re-shot, hence no need of two pages. Its like buying a same branded product in different outlets managed by same brand. In case of Yuva and Aaytha Ezhuthu or Ye Maaya Chesave/Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa/Ekk Deewana Tha, seperate articles are required as though they are same story, bilingual/multilingual and shot simultaneously/later yet they have a major crew change with crucial facts. I hope i partially answered your query. Maybe this issue can be discussed with other editors too for opinion or arriving at conclusion. Eitherway lemme know the status. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Discussion - Bardia Rahim
You recently wiped out the entire page of work for Bardia Rahim. It was a lot of work that was 100% resourced as reputable with .govs and national newspaper publications such at the San Diego Union Tribune. I have completed numerous excellent Wikipedia and the the notability on the subject meets Wikipedia's golden rule and tone is neutral an unbiased and adheres to polices and guidelines on Wikipedia. Please reinstate the page so it may be edited and worked on as the subject plays a key role in particular segments and industries and is a well known notable living person. There was no need to wipe the entire page of work clean, you have listed what may need editing to improve the page. Please change it back to its original file to be edited immediately or I will take this to discussion where a decision will be made on my article to improve it and discussion on your privilege to edit in our community. Osrius (talk) 07:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * - Coming to article point of view, i stand by my decision (for wikipedia to be encyclopaedic and neutral). But this article isn't. If it "100% resourced as reputable with .govs and national newspaper publications such at the San Diego Union Tribune" meets golden rule, why to make edits even after declined. You even removed/altered his/her decline edit. Is it neutral/unbiased? In an biography article, only once and first time where he has introduction, his name should be mentioned from a first or second person's point of view and in the entire article it should be from a third party view. But till this the neutrality seems to be compromised as evidently. Example: Rahim was host, Rahim was enrolled, Bardia Rahimzadeh was born, Rahimzadeh shortened his, After Rahim's fathers house, At age sixteen a young Rahim looked to get a job,  Rahim knew if, took place for Rahim.,  Rahim’s hearing, prosecutors, Rahim an , Rahim refused to give, Rahim’s prison cell where, Rahim, a Brown Belt who trains, added Rahim to their team,  Rahim trains with, Rahim is competing for. Why this much of Rahim? Were u so attached or close to him? Or is he ur friend or the user Osrius and Rahim are same or do Osrius owe something for Rahim? Does this mean neutrality or unbiased. Read about neutrality here. References are not in format as per guidelines laid. Particularly, facebook and pinterest, which has to be avoided. If you want to create or improve articles for wikipedia look for necessary guidelines and read FA and GA, which sets a high standard. One important thing, i urge to guard your tone while making comments. All editors have right to express what is right, but one should have good faith. In my experience at wikipedia, i had never come across or heard of undoing/reverting the declined by a reviewer. Wondering what amounts to that? But u did, kudos. I open to discuss regarding the article where you take to, even on my privilege to edit. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 14:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * No I disagree, all you had to do is edit it so that Rahim's name is taken out more times than used, if necessary. Real simple stuff. This is an encyclopedia in which he is a notable person for his industry and instead of cleaning up the page which is still written very well I made edits to make sure it was good enough AP PERSON MADE threats that is another story, I see you have a history of making bad edits that are always corrected? Just as in this case. This page will be escalated for third party review and opinion so that it may be cleaned up for acceptance.22:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * HOWEVER, I do understand your point, sorry if I misscommunicated or conveyed what I was trying to say. I would like to work with you to resolve and make this page good and myself a better editor. So whatever you believe I need to change I will. simple as that! Additionally if you want to help me it would be much appreciated? Thank You and I look forward to your response.


 * Again you just deleted a different page, why is that you only delete my stuff, I want another editor to look at it not you! I feel you are stalking me and I would like you to leave me alone. Additionally I am reaching out to you to fix it and make additional changes, only if needed. Not only that but do you understand the English meaning of genericization? This company is so well known its trademark has suffered from genericization.


 * - I visited the AFC page only to review and also to comment/suggest for improvement and make a note to the creator of the article and not to edit. Well if that is "Real simple stuff", you yourself could have removed it, when you had visited similar highly rated biography articles. I knew wikipedia is a encyclopedia and came across more than 1000s of articles with very well written and not well written, and Barda Rahim falls in the latter category. He may be notable, he's projected in wikipedia with indigently written phrases and references. Do come up with good third party reference. regarding your observations on my bad edits. I forgive on that. Justify how  made threats? It was his/her motive or style on how, where and what to edit and to keep wikipedia better. Thats it. It with almost every editor. Even with you too, since your contributions show most of your edits with people you know, working within a limited sphere. I just here to edit, not to bully os stalk, i dislike it literally and idiomatically. Your fear is very fictional. By the way, which page i deleted? I leave alone that Barda Rahim article review with this comment. Am fed up. As i have some better work to do.  --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 23:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)