User talk:Balayka

October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Primefac, you may be blocked from editing. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Tony thanks but logs and my warning message at article's talk page are enough to support the idea that I am genuinely trying to prevent someone who does not seem (or does he?) know what they re doing to sabotage an article. I have touch based with the relevant persons listed in the talk page to address the issue. Removing all the additional content that had been logged is pure vandalism so YES I am currently talking to Juergen and Ali.Ahmed, YES we will document the talk page, though we don't have a lot of time to waste so any well-intentioned "editor" should behave and add relevant comments such as "missing source" or whatever and NOT throw away the content, YES whenever one has time it's going reach the Consensus desk, and YES should you try and curse we with the "blocking policy" little whip, all of THAT will be my very first topic upon arrival in Amsterdam this November 21st. Balayka (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

 * Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ( ~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not change others' comments. New comments go at the bottom, under the comments they are responding to.
 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * User-generated sources (such as blogs, social media profiles, self-published books, or pay-to-print books) are generally not reliable sources. The only exception is when an already notable subject makes a claim about themselves that is not countered or doubted by independent sources.
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
 * Assume other editors are here to help as much as is possible.

Also, you should really take a look at this guide, especially the section on formatting. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)