User talk:Balbaugh


 * }

Welcome
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'll be the mentor for your group working on Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC, so please let me know if need help with anything.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

=project 6=

‘’’’’Verizon Communications v. FCC’’’’’, 535 U.S. 467 (2002), was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 13, 2002, in an opinion written by Justice Souter. The Respondent, FCC, received six out of eight votes with Justice Bryer and Justice Scalia dissenting.

reference (2002)Verizon Communications v. FCC. 10 March 2011. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_00_511 Verizon Communications was arguing that the FCC had an unreasonable way for setting rates for leasing network elements. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 entitles the FCC to set these rates and they do so on a forward looking basis, untied to the incumbents historical or past investments. reference (2003). Verizon Communications Inc. v FCC, 122 S. Ct. 1646 (2002). 11 CommLaw Conspectus 221 2003 Major Court Decisions, Winter 2002. (pp. 221-222). 7 February 2011. http://www.heinonline.org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cconsp11&id=1&size=2&collection=journals&index=journals/cconsp

In the certiorari from the Supreme Court to the Appeal court they state, “In order to foster competition between monopolistic carriers providing local telephone service and companies seeking to enter local markets provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act) entitle the new entrants to lease elements of the incumbent carriers local-exchange networks”. Other cases included in the same certiorari are: WorldCom, Inc., et al. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al., Federal Communications Commission et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.,, AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al. , General Communications, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.

reference (2002) October Term, 2001. 10 March 2011. http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/00-511.pdf

updates
I made some changes which are all under assignment 6 part 1 on mytalk and can be uploaded to pdf, with any additional changes we want to make before duetime, J Komara (talk) 03:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Article updates
I created the page layout for our article as it was approved, if you want to add the physical content for your contribution just copy the paragraph source from my page then it should be fine J Komara (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MSU Greenline


The article MSU Greenline has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Advert for unnotable entity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)