User talk:Bale jasmine

A goat for you!
your work is appreciated! BAAAAAA!

RosieJR (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 

A kitten for you!

 * 3

Sendovani (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 

A kitten for you!
Kitty!!!

Betula Fagales (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 

Feedback on your article
Hello! Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. If possible, I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: sufficient
 * Headers:
 * The whole purpose of links is that this makes it possible that we do not have to define all the connected topics as we can just link to it. This I mention as the section of About the Author is largely irrelevant for the article about the book. For example, how is the dead of the author in 1959 related to the book? I do not read it in the article. Therefore I think a some parts can be used elsewhere in the article, other parts can be removed.
 * You love to use capitals. Nouns in German are capitalised, in English they are normally not. For example "Perception and Impact" and "Literary Styles" each has a capital too many.
 * References: It seems everything has a reference! Congratulations, you are the only group that passes this criterion.
 * Context: I am happy with the context, besides one thing. Usually a context is what happened before the creation of the book and describes the steps what did lead to the book. The current context describes a development (at such fine), but it reads like that the next sentence after this section would be something like: "Out of nowhere the book was published." I do not want to have that feeling, I miss a bridge between the developments described in the this section and the publication of the book.
 * How was the book received: More is needed. I read "anonymous translator [...] made comments" -> can this be described?
 * Other: Also I am not sure why the front cover of Origin of Species is used...