User talk:Balhaqar

{{db-u1|not much contributions= } Glover page has to be removed as said by her.Chech discussion page

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Louise Glover, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Louise Glover was changed by Balhaqar (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-08-25T11:05:25+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. — Kralizec! (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC) ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

Please stop adding requests for speedy deletion to the Louise Glover article. It clearly does not match any criteria and any further requests will be seen as disruption -- Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  21:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

And, if you haven't seen it, WP:Autobiography suggests ways on how to deal with problems in the article. Note however, as Louise Glover is notable, that it is very very unlikely that the article will be deleted. -- Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  21:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest Re: Louise Glover
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Bobyllib (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

QD and picture removal
Hello Balhaqar, I've noticed you're keen to delete the Louise Glover page and if not, at least the picture. Right now there's no good reason to do either, as the subject is notable and the picture is free to use. By all means contact me personally (using the link in the toolbox on the left-hand side of the page) if you don't wish to discuss this issue online but be aware that if you continue to edit this way, this account will be permanently blocked. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)