User talk:Baligema

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangalorean (Website)


A tag has been placed on Bangalorean (Website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Milton India


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Milton India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eurodyne (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bridal association of america


A tag has been placed on Bridal association of america, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 03:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

inuse articles
Hi, Rahulgemawath! I noticed you just added some tags to John Killeen Handy (politician) which is flagged as article for classroom purposes. I'd appreciate it if you didn't tag these in this way as these articles are deliberate stubs which the students will work on (as explained in the inuse tag). Adding extra tags will only confuse them. Thanks Kerry (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I will revoke this.


 * Further to this, please familiarise yourself with WP:POLITICIAN. As a member of a state parliament, Henry Williams is intrinsically notable period, and you just nominated him for speedy deletion when he's not eligible for deletion at all. Two sentences is not "no content" for the purposes of the CSD criteria and never has been. You desperately need to familiarise yourself more with Wikipedia policy if you're going to run around tagging things. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I will revoke this.

Are you editing for pay?
Hi there Baligema. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I have served Wikipedia as non profit things. I Wont edit Anymore. I am Investigating Journalist. I didnt knew this things on wikipedia exist. Where verdict is passed without hearing.

other username etc never heard of. I have removed many prod tags where ever i felt those are wrong also kept prod on many page which where not eligible. why not you check other pages patrolled. Dont know what to say

Thanks.

Sockpuppet investigation
SmartSE (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi I Was blocked, I saw that it was due to multiple account. I dont have internet at my place. So I uses one particular internet center in my area. It might be that other user have the same hobby. I dont know that. I request to please unblock my account. You can see my account activities. I have made few mistake in starting but since when i have got to know the editing policies. I am very proper with guidelines. Next - As far as i know i have seen admin on wikipedia are calm to newbies and so i request to please unblock my account. Its not worth deleting after so much in past i have contributed. Please

Nomination of MedjetAssist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MedjetAssist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MedjetAssist (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

- who is the sockmaster here? Also, what evidence do you have? PhilKnight (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please give details here; who do you believe is the puppet master, and why?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * There's a link to the SPI in the section "Sockpuppet investigation" above: .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The explanation is at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Smileverse, the tag is pending the correct split of that case.&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I note the confirmation of sockpuppetry; the fact that this is the sockmaster rather than a sockpuppet is, of course, of only marginal relevance in terms of the unblock request. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Mattress retailers in United States


The article List of Mattress retailers in United States has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * List created by a spammer/sock to drive traffic to a page created for promotion of a paid client. Lacks a lead section and is basically a recreation of the "Mattress retailers of the United States" category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of NPOs in Nigeria


The article List of NPOs in Nigeria has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * List created by a spammer/sock to drive traffic to a page created for direct compensation; it is an unnecessary list that lacks a lead section.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Inks.LWC,

I have create this articles based on the similar article over here on this page. If you wish to delete on that basis then you can go ahead and deleted this one too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NGOs_in_Mumbai Inks.LWC

Draft:Waaw Foundation concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Waaw Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Waaw Foundation


Hello, Baligema. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Waaw Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 08:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)