User talk:Balladeer

Proposed deletion of Kate O'Neil
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kate O'Neil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Does not meet notability. Google her name + Cleveland brings up nothing

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Authentic Films


The article Authentic Films has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Film company that only produced one film and does not pass the guidelines for corps.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 20:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kate O'Neil for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate O'Neil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kate O'Neil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Be..anyone &#x1F4A9;  01:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Benator


The article Andrew Benator has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * BLP Article with no valid sources. IMDB ref is invalid. Second ref to achievement site 404's

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Filmic Achievement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filmic Achievement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Filmic Achievement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)