User talk:Balldez

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fat acceptance movement has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://biggerfatterblog.blogspot.com/, http://the-biggest-fattest-blog.blogspot.com/ (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:NPOV, WP:OR, and blogs
Hi, I just reverted your edits to Fat fetishism. While it's always great to get new editors on Wikipedia, you should know that editing here is a bit different from editing other sites on the internet, primarily because WP has rules about what kind of information can go into articles. In the welcome notice posted above, there's a bunch of information that will help, but I want to point out a few specific concerns. First, please be sure that all edits you make are neutral--that is, the cannot promote a particular opinion or point of view. Second, please do not include any original research--an example was your claim that the speaker is disingenuous because of his connections to a certain magazine. While in the real world such an analysis makes perfect sense and is acceptable reasoning, on Wikipedia, we are only allowed to repeat the reasoning made by reliable sources. Speaking of reliable sources, my final point is that you should know (as the bot mentioned above), blogs are almost never considered to be acceptable sources for Wikipedia articles. Instead, you need to use things like newspaper articles, reliable magazines and journals, books published by respectable (usually academic) publishing companies, etc.

If you have any questions about all about this or about Wikipedia, you are welcome to ask them here, or you can come ask me on my talk page. Again, thanks for joining and editing Wikipedia! Qwyrxian (talk) 00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Fat acceptance movement
I reverted your edit because you added a link to blogspot. Blogspot is not considered an acceptable website to source to, as they are self published. Please see WP:RS for a better understanding of what is acceptable for sources. If you have any questions, leave a note on my talk page. Thanks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Fat acceptance movement
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Fat acceptance movement, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holizz (talk • contribs) 02:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm PBASH607. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to DivX because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Prabash ''' What?  15:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Fat acceptance movement. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 13:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

As a result of a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism, I have checked all edits from this account. At first, I thought that perhaps, despite the messages above, you had failed to grasp the point that Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting a point of view and publicising a blog. However, as I checked further, it became abundantly clear that you know full well what you are doing, and are not only abusing Wikipedia to promote your opinions and to spam links to a blog, but also consciously and deliberately trolling. This account has therefore been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)