User talk:Balph Eubank/Archives/2010/June

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Request
Please do not edit my talk page. Thank you. --63.226.104.225 (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not actually your talk page, it's Wikipedia's talk page. It's a Shared IP in any case, so next time your router or modem resets, you'll have a new one. So don't worry about it. Burpelson AFB (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dixie Travel Plaza
A tag has been placed on Dixie Travel Plaza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Help
Would you do me a favor and userfy Dixie Travel Plaza for me? User:Burpelson_AFB/sandbox is fine. It's an important place in the longhaul US truck driving world and I can improve it. I asked the deleting admin but he appears to be offline. Burpelson AFB (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ 7  22:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dixie Travel Plaza
I have nominated Dixie Travel Plaza, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dixie Travel Plaza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Help
I am attempting to save your article which has been sent to deletion (by the same person who tagged it for speedy, based on the artivle history). Not too sure what this guy has against truck stops. You don't seem to edit on weekends, but hopefully you'll see this and stop by. I've added all kinds of links to the discussion but I'm not sure if you want me to try and add them to the article. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

your Recent Edit to Scientology
Hi, I am Weaponbb7 Letting you know that the edit you made. I have reverted it, In order to achieve WP:NPOV we try not to label Religions as inventions the same as we would the VCR. Why i dont think you did it with malice i thought it would be useful to explain in person.

Thank you Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:12, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh by the way love the username Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, presumably if it was invented then it is was "created" and its "made up" or in laymen's term "imaginary" or "false." It is important to remain NPOV with Agnosticism here on Wikipedia as Far as religious Topics on Wikipedia. We do not Believe any Religion is True or False because to assert either is will Result in bad POV Pushing on wikipedia. We take Mr. Hubbards word that this Revelation of his Xenu and all of that is maybe true or maybe false. No one on earth was around to see that Galactic War just as take Moses' Word that God Said "let their Be light" Here at wikipedia We Document such beliefs though and avoid passing judgement on the validity. I understand the intent of your edit and the logic thus did not mark it as vandalism.

Cheers Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Relativity
Please don't add the American inventions category to Theory of relativity like you did here and here again. If you really want to pursue this, you might try proposing this on the article's talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Why would I propose it on the talk page? That makes about as much sense as asking if I can say that the Greeks invented the concept of Democracy. In what way is saying that Albert Einstein, who emigrated to the United States in 1933, invented the theory of relativity? Burpelson AFB (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * See for instance WP:BRD. If you want to make a change to an article, then go ahead. If some people don't agree, the change should be discussed on the article's talk page. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * BRD is an essay. Anyway, as I said on the article talk, if you think it's based on where he lived at the time of the invention, then make it a German invention category. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Six Sigma
Please don't add the American inventions category to Six Sigma like you did here. Six Sigma is not tangible, but it's a just quality process. This will make us think at every management style/process in the world as an invention. Thanks. Pm master 22:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no legitimate justification for removal. Motorola is an American company, they invented the concept. Reducing Six Sigma to a management process is incorrect as well, it's a major quality concept used by major corporations across the planet. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Rest
I think I need a day off. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat?. CIreland (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

PBML
It's all trolling, don't believe anything, don't talk to trolls. WP:DENY. Cheers, Jack Merridew 02:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Even if it's something he totally made up, how lame and weak is that? Anyway, onward and upward. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Please keep conversations in one place. You can not have had time to read DENY since you took it to my page. The fuck-tard is getting off on your falling for this. Kindly shut up. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 02:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC) and remove this whole thread
 * Uh huh. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)