User talk:Baluperoth

Welcome!
Hello, Baluperoth, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as V S Vijayan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of V S Vijayan


A tag has been placed on V S Vijayan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashique Kuruniyan


The article Ashique Kuruniyan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashique Kuruniyan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashique Kuruniyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ashique Kuruniyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * Yamla, it seems you didn't understand Baluperoth's comment above. seems a very different person (who also recreated the article recently).  and, could you look on this as both of you commented on the SPI page in archive. This is a block happened in one year ago for a single incident and Baluperoth's area of interest is biology. This is a checkuser block; so may be handled by a check user. , , , could you check and advise Baluperoth's on how to appeal if this request is not the right method? I was asked for help as I too from Kerala. I checked Guide_to_appealing_blocks; but didn't understand the exact procedure. I think the user is eligible for a Standard offer.  J e e  15:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh, I think I'd be fine with that, but I have to make a correction. Baluperoth: "of which one user is found unrelated by the editors"? No, the IP of one user was found to be unrelated to the others, by Checkusers. That is a big difference. Checkuser still confirmed Baluperoth and Arshaque1993 as identical. So if someone wants to unblock, that is fine with me, but it should be as a consequence of OFFER, not because the SPI was somehow faulty. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Drmies. I think he can be unblocked per OFFER as 14 months had passed. J e e  16:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In the SPI, Drmies placed a note of reference that "the "likely" outcome is borne out by considerable behavioral evidence". While searching the exact string that mentioned as all three users repeated in all re-creations of the article, I got a single result, http://deletionpedia.org/en/Ashique_Kuruniyan. That site seems a replica of our AfDs created by . I don't know whether the acting checkuser and other checkusers were aware of it. Anyway this gives the possibility that anyone can re-create a deleted article with the same mistakes without the help of original author.  J e e  02:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I have some questions. First of Baluperoth: I also have questions for. You said you were asked to help because you are also from Kerala. Who asked you to help? Kerala has 33M people. Do you know Baluperoth personally?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) What kind of "institution" do you edit from?
 * 2) Do you know the IPs used by the institution?
 * 3) If not, do you know the ISP of the institution?
 * 4) You came back on March 2 and made two edits. Were they from that institution? Were they from the railway station?
 * 5) Do you have Internet access at home? If so, who is your ISP?

Answers to the questions by.
 * 1&2: I work in a research institution namely, Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (http://jntbgri.res.in/) as a scientist and did some edits in the past from here. I am not sure about the IP (66.147.242.172?)
 * 1) 3.The internet connection in the institute is currently provided by national knowledge network of India with 1651 institutions connected to it (http://nkn.gov.in/connected-institutions). Previously, the ISP was BSNL.
 * 2) 4&5. The edits made yesterday (March 2) and now is from my home (not from institution or railway station) IP: 117.203.25.97 (BSNL). In past, I also did some wiki edits from my wife's home (ISP is BSNL) and my place of stay near the institution (ISP is Asianet Broadband Services). The railway station from which I did some edits is Thiruvananthapuram Central, where google provide free internet connection through https://www.railwire.co.in/.

An additional point for your consideration: The original content of the page (Ashique Kuruniyan) I created was deleted based on WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Unfortunately, the same exact content is still available in a website: http://deletionpedia.org/en/Ashique_Kuruniyan. Suspected sock puppets might have copy, pasted and recreated the page, therefore, behavioural evidence mentioned in the note by Drmies is expected. Once again, may I request you to unblock me as I am not related to the sock puppets and not involved in the recreation of the deleted page? I wish to make productive contributions to wiki by following the rules and regulations.

The website http://deletionpedia.org is keeping copies of more than 57,000 deleted wiki pages. So, in future anyone can be trapped in a sock puppetry like my case. Thanks for listening. Baluperoth (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23. I am Jeevan Jose from Kerala, who represented the community along with others in the Princess of Asturias Award ceremony. I'm an active member of biodiversity related edits from Kerala and actively involved in bringing more scientists and naturalists to wiki. As part of this mission I know Baluperoth and talked to him through phone. Not yet met him personally though. J e e 03:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you both for your answers to my questions. I can now see why Jee acted as an advocate. Based on Peroth's answers, I believe it more likely than not that he is not a sock. I have therefore unblocked him. Best of luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Bbb23. I hope this is very beneficial to over biodiversity mission in Wikipedia. J e e  16:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the support Bbb23 and . Baluperoth (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)