User talk:Baman Tary

Welcome!
Hello, Baman Tary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Spelling "corrections"
Please STOP "correcting" spellings, when they are not mistakes, but a direct copy of the original.

In the quotation William Reinoldes of Lisnaore in the parrish of Templeport in the County of Cavan gent sworne & examined deposeth and sajth That about the begining of the presente Rebellion this deponent was deprived robbed or otherwise dispoiled & Lost by the Rebells: in the Corrasmongan article you "corrected" begining - when it is obvious from the sentence that the spelling is that used in 1643 and, as a quotation, spellings should not be corrected

In the Pavan Duggal article you "corrected" begining in the reference "Rise of digital India-begining(sic) of a new dawn, http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/Cyberlawsintodaystimes/entry/rise-of-digital-india-begining-of-a-new-dawn" even though it is clearly marked (sic) because the mistake is in the original, furthermore, you left the (sic) although there was no remaining error. Please see sic if you do not understand the use of that error indicator.

Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Young (died 1589). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Headout for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Headout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Headout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)