User talk:Bamrsykp

Topic proposal
--Taweetham (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * --Taweetham (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Your topic, Chemical storage is now approved. See further instructions below. --Taweetham (talk) 06:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

First draft
--Taweetham (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

First edit on the article namespace
--Taweetham (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi from your reviewer
Hello Bamrsykp, welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to be your reviewer for the ICCH224 course. Please feel free to contact me via my talk page if you have any questions about anything. Cheers, --Pilarbini (talk) 06:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments for chemical storage article
Hello Bamrsykp,

Thanks for your contribution in chemical storage article. Here are some suggestions.

General comments: Lead section is well written especially in emphasising the topic importance, but need be polished especially with grammar. The article still lacks wikilinks. Overall, please reread and check grammar for the whole article, look for errors in spacing, punctuation, capitalization, and subject-verb agreement.

Specific comments:
 * "Therefore, the chemical laboratory must be stored properly to prevent any prior accident." — subsequent accidents?

Hope you find this useful, feel free to contact me if you have further questions. --Pilarbini (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Captitalize only the first letter in section heading
 * Note that the introduction section is included in the leading section (as removed by )
 * Principles of chemical storage section
 * Rephrase “Labeling, every chemical need to label” and please check your grammar
 * “Do not store chemical alphabetically”— why not? Any exceptions? Cite?)
 * “and must be categorized which based on their degree ” — more like Chemical Storage Group instead of degree?
 * "Minimize quantities, stored a chemical in an appropriate amount." — appropriate according to what?
 * "Avoid a chemicals from being in contact to heat or direct sunlight. (This may deteriorate the chemical container as well as the degradation of the chemicals"— please rephrase or check grammar
 * "Maintaining a proper condition of chemical storage areas." — elaborate what does a proper condition means?
 * "Types of chemical storage" section— the heading is somewhat misleading, might be better to add "facility"
 * "frequently used chemical storage;" — change ; to.
 * For each items listed, consider having the first sentence that explains the distinct characteristic of that type.
 * "Shelving ..." — describe and give reason of using this type of storage facility, now the content seemed to be more suitable in Guidelines section
 * "Cabinets, there are various types of cabinets..." — change to something like "Cabinets exist in various types, which is made up of different materials serving different function." before further describing each type
 * Maintenance section
 * any sources? if this section is too short, it can be merged with guidelines.
 * Thank you for your suggestion :D่ --Bamrsykp (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution to the article. Please have a look at similar articles on Wikipedia e.g. Storage of cultural heritage objects and learn from the example. --Taweetham (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Please carefully read WP:NOT and make sure that your article has an encyclopedic tone.
 * 2) References should be added to support your text and should be properly formatted by the templates, cite web or cite journal.

It is important to read before you write. Please learn how to use Help:Page_history to appreciate the work of other editors before you contribute to the article. If there are any disagreements, it is important to discuss/resolve issues/conflicts on discussion/talk pages. If you do not understand or need help, our student volunteers are ready to help. --Taweetham (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chemical storage. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chemical storage. DMacks (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Chemical storage
I saw your edits to the chemical storage article. You have improved it quite a bit; it was in a sorry state before you started editing it. Thanks for that! I also noticed, however, that your more recent edits were often considered problematic and were either heavily modified by others or reverted outright. I must agree with DMacks that edits such as this or this are problematic: The latter includes broken references (did you copy-paste that from elsewhere?), the grammar is problematic, it reads in part like a how-to guide (something Wikipedia is not), and at least in part the advice even seems rather dubious (sodium chloride, ie salt, should be "double contained"? I don't think that's how it's commonly stored, certainly not in my kitchen). At this point it may be best to start a discussion on the article's talk page regarding what further improvement is needed and what references should be used. Huon (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Meetup
You are invited to the meet up. --Taweetham (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)