User talk:Ban.wma

And I'd like a different admin to review. My good-faith in TexasAndroid has expired.

BLocking
I'm being confused for shill. I support the name and his general philosophy, but I'm not a puppet.

Ok. I blocked you as a sock of Shill/Pro-Lick/etc for two things. One, you reverted to Pro-Lick's version, an action which sock puppet after sock-puppet of his has been doing today. Second, your first edit ever was around 24 hours after shill first received his user name block, and less thatn an hour after your first edit you dived into the middle of that situation on his side.

Given your protests, though, I will request a user check on this account as soon as I can, and we will see once and for all if this is or is not the same person. If I am wrong, I will apologize fully and lift the block. - TexasAndroid 22:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have unblocked until the sock check can be performed. By requesting the check I'm admitting at least a small doubt that you are a sock of Shill/Pro-Lick/etc.  Since that is the core offense for the block, I cannot really leave it in place until that is established.  So you are unblocked for now.  If the sock check comes back positive, the block will go right back up.  (And if it comes back negative you will have the apology I promised in the previous comment.) - TexasAndroid 00:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The unblock isn't working.--Ban.WMA 00:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Likely got your IP blocked as well when you tried to edit after the block was put in place. Let me see if I can track the remaining block down. - TexasAndroid 00:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok. Try once more.  - TexasAndroid 00:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Works. Thanks.
 * Checkuser has shown that you are, indeed the same user as Shill/etc. The block is returned. The reset 3RR block on the Pro-Lick account has a little over 24 hours left.  If you will just sit out this last amount of time, that block will expire, and you can edit with it once more.  If that is not the account you would like to keep, just let me know, and I will let any of the other of your accounts be the one to be unblocked at that point. - TexasAndroid 12:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ridiculous. How does this Checkuser thing work?  I want to keep my account.  This account.  As for Pro-Lick/shill, you will have to talk to him about what he wants to keep.--Ban.WMA 17:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

WP:RCU for the general checkuser page. Here for the archive of the specific request. In this specific case, Essjay is the one who performed the check. In the general, a checkuser involves looking at the IP associated with each edit. In the specific, I cannot tell you what the results showed, as that information is limited to the few people with Checkuser access, like Essjay. This is for privacy reasons. The people who perform the checks will report whether there is a connection between the users in question or not, but will give no specific details of the connection. - TexasAndroid 21:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Insert Complaints Here
Please take more care in your edits to the GW Bush article. Some of them are pointless and border on vandalism. Creating a paragraph with three consecutive short sentences beginning "He ..." is not improved writing. -- Cecropia 07:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Application of policy on Abortion related articles
I can assure you Pro-Lick has a poor understanding of policy. Do not follow zis example; and instead ask and have good comprehension of policy and how it applies to the situation before referencing it. Original research is an allegation by Pro-Lick, which is unsubstantiated and could lead to significant sanctions if the behavior continues. - RoyBoy 800 18:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)