User talk:Bananas Monkey

Welcome!

Hello, Bananas Monkey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2012 in television, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ol Yeller Talktome 21:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of 2012 in television


The article 2012 in television has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Why would there need to be a disambiguation page for such a subject?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Ol Yeller Talktome 21:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 2012–13 United States network television schedule for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 United States network television schedule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2012–13 United States network television schedule until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cutecutecuteface2000 (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2012–13 United States network television schedule
A tag has been placed on 2012–13 United States network television schedule requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cutecutecuteface2000 (talk) 06:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2011 United States summer network television schedule


A tag has been placed on 2011 United States summer network television schedule requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/68.44.179.54 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Farine (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Your redirects...
Do you have any proof that the Kung Fu Panda film franchise will end up with six editions beyond the CEO crowing he's hoping it's getting to that point? Then wait until the actual film project is announced until redirecting it. In the meantime, all of your redirects are being deleted, as nobody in 2011 is going to type in Kung Fu Panda 6, and it won't even be called that alone. Thank you.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 11:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unsupervised


The article Unsupervised has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calabe1992 21:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Great Escape (U.S. TV series)


A tag has been placed on The Great Escape (U.S. TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --- Angel from PAKISTAN  Let's talk about it! 02:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2012 United States summer network television schedule


A tag has been placed on 2012 United States summer network television schedule requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KTC (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Gossip Girl
What are you doing? There is a consensus to keep the television series at Gossip Girl. If you would like to change the consensus, then open a WP:RM discussion - do not edit war moving the article. Will you please move it back and open a discussion? Also, see WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Nymf hideliho! 19:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can do that. I hope you don't oppose my discussion, though.  Bob Mono (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't move it back! I tried, but it was invalid.  Bob Mono (talk) 20:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * There's a talk about redirecting Gossip Girl (disambiguation) to Gossip Girl at Talk:Gossip Girl (disambiguation) anyway, so why move it back? Bob Mono (talk) 00:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Closing RMs
Please see WP:INVOLVED for why someone participating in any discussion shouldnt close it  Hot Stop  01:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to V (TV network), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. █ EMARSEE   02:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

R.E.D. (Ne-Yo album)
I see you moved this page to R.E.D. (album). Maybe you didn't see it but there was a discussion on the article talk page earlier this month about moving the page and the result was a not to move it, that is why I have moved it back. If you disagree with the decision you can always start another discussion using Requested moves. Regards Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Page moves
Hi, I noticed that you do a lot of page moves. When doing these, please be a bit more careful. Your most recent move, "Somebody That I Used to Know (song)", created confusion: you did not create a disambiguation page at "Somebody That I Used to Know", which left a ton of red links in many articles. I have created the disambig page, however now there are a bunch of articles that used to link to the song's old location:. When you move a page you really should fix all of these also so that there are not a slew of redirects and you are not leaving a bunch of work for other editors to clean up. Thanks - eo (talk) 14:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop all page moves
Hi Bananas Monkey. I have just spent over an hour cleaning up incorrect page moves you've made and I don't know that I've touched the surface. You are 1) moving pages that are not ambiguous to parenthetically disambiguated names, 2) moving multiple pages based on a misunderstanding of words, i.e., your move of multiple articles on TV networks from (TV network) to (TV channel) 3) completely ignoring basically Article titles completely in your page moves—certainly as to the common names policy, and 4) not cleaning up after you moves (fixing double redirects, sort keys, fair use rationales, hatnotes, and leads). I like the enthusiasm. I don't want you to be discouraged by this. But article titling and page moves are both things that require experience and knowledge which you don't have; you are causing damage and extra work. I am asking you to stop all such activity now. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to support Fuhghettaboutit's request and recommend you get consensus on the talk pages of articles before executing page moves in the future. Like Fuhghettaboutit, I also like to see someone getting so involved in the project and hope you'll stay as active as ever but take care that you have other editors' agreement before making changes with the technical criteria and wide ranging impacts of page moves. Joja lozzo  03:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnQuébécois (talk • contribs) 03:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Warning notice
This is your final warning on this issue, due to your consistently disruptive behavior, intentional or unintentional, in this area: please do not move any article on Wikipedia without first obtanining consensus for the move on the article's talk page. If you fail to obtain consensus for any page move you make prior to the move, then you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I apologize if I have went crazy, but what if it's uncontroversial? Bob Mono (talk) 01:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * This applies even to uncontroversial moves. Any move, at all, MUST be sent through the RM process. I apologie for not getting back to you on this, and therefore there will be no sanctions because of your move of 18 Months (album), but you must discuss any and all moves, no matter what. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) I think it behooves you to demonstrate your ability to discern an uncontroversial move from a controversial one by discussing changes even when you think they are uncontroversial. Given your history and very clear warnings here, I think your recent move of 18 Months, which was probably technically correct, shows continued poor judgment and lack of a collaborative sensibility. Wikipedia is not a project where loners can easily succeed and insistence on going your own way is likely to land you in trouble here.  Joja  lozzo  05:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Bad for Me.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 01:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

The Neighbors (1975 TV series)
Per Naming conventions (television), game shows use (game show), not (TV series). I've moved this back to The Neighbors (game show). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation accepted
 Bad for Me, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! The biggest issue is that you did not cite any reliable sources. Please contact me if you need help learning how things work around here. I know that starting can feel like an uphill battle and others helped me get started.  Royal broil  03:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Supernatural (U.S. TV series)
As a previous "mover" of this article, there is a discussion in regards to the renaming at Talk:Supernatural_(U.S._TV_series) you ar invited to join. Betty Logan (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Celebrity Diving


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Celebrity Diving requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 21:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Celebrity Diving


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Celebrity Diving requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Zappa  O  Mati   17:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Creating disambiguation pages.
Greetings! When you move an existing article to create a disambiguation page, please take care to fix all incoming links immediately. Otherwise, readers following those existing links will not longer be taken to the article, and will be confused as to which link they should follow. Please do this now for the disambiguation pages you have already created. Cheers! bd2412 T 05:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am concerned that you do not seem to take seriously the inconvenience that page moves can cause. Unfortunately, I feel left with no choice but to act on that concern. bd2412  T 02:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have proposed at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to remove your page-move ability so that you can learn to work through these issues at Requested moves. bd2412  T 02:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent disruptive editing. You have been warned, repeatedly, not to make any page moves without discussion, and yet you continue to do so, causing disruption to the project. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 06:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Fireflies (song)
Please xix the pages that link to Fireflies (song) that should now point to Fireflies (Owl City song). Because of your actions, no bot will do it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I took care of this temporarily by redirecting Fireflies (song) to Fireflies (Owl City song).
 * @Bananas Monkey: You must stop moving pages and I suggest you stay away from editing redirect pages as well. Your unilateral endeavors here are doing more harm than good. If you continue, you will likely be blocked from making any edits at all. Joja  lozzo  02:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for disruptive editing. As you know, you were placed under an editing restriction not to make any page moves without using the Requested Move process, and as demonstrated here, you understand that process. However, you have since made further page moves without using the RM process, here and here, choosing not to use the RM process despite the fact that you were told you must, for all moves you wish to perform, even seemingly uncontroversial ones, and you have been blocked twice before for exactly these same actions. Flaunting an editing restriction like this, repeatedly, is disruptive editing and only reaffirms the need for the restriction; repeated disruption despite repeated blocks for said disruption, and a clear indication that you understand how to comply with the community's restrictions on your editing, but are choosing not to, can only be tolerated for so long before it is determined that your continued presence is a net negative to the project. If, after this block expires, you move a page, any page, for any reason, without going through the WP:RM process, your next block will be indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 02:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

My First Kiss
I restored the redirect at My First Kiss since all the links to that page are now intended for My First Kiss (song) since you made that page move. Please stop all page moves or edits on disambiguation and redirect pages. If you think a page should be moved or a disambiguation or redirect page should be edited, please talk to other editors before attempting it or ask someone else to do it for you. Thanks. Joja lozzo  02:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Book:Canceled/Ended Series (2011–2012 Season)


The book Book:Canceled/Ended Series (2011–2012 Season) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: "Not a book"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the book's talk page.

Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes still exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 19:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)