User talk:Bananasasas

Welcome!
Hello, Bananasasas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Square One: Michael Jackson; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Woody (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Thank you for your alert. I have followed the guidelines as I understand them and proven my edit is correct. It was not challenged with any sources so it should stand. Please visit Talk:Square_One:_Michael_Jackson. I also find the tone of the person responding to be unpleasant and almost threatening. I don't understand it all. Why is this controversial? I have corrected an important fact on that page that is helpful and shouldn't be offensive to anyone. Bananasasas (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I was conscious that you might not have been aware of edit warring and also that you were in the middle of one. You are doing the right thing with your comments on the talk page and backing up your contention with sources. I can understand why you would feel the response is unpleasant as well and I have just warned the other editor. I hope that the discussion stays on the content and not the contributors. Woody (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen this edit before I made the above comment. I would respectfully ask that you let a consensus form on the talk page before making edits that may be controversial and before making edits for which there is an active discussion ongoing. There is no deadline here and it can wait a few days for a consensus to form. It might be worth asking for outside opinions using the content dispute resolution process. Woody (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Woody I will try the content dispute option. Thank you for your guidance. Bananasasas (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

General Sanctions
Woody (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
To enforce community-authorised general sanctions, and for violating discretionary sanctions, as described at WP:GS/MJ, you have been blocked from editing for 72 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 18:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)   Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

Blocked for doing proper research
Woody


 * You edits to Talk:Charles Thomson (journalist) are a clear violation of your topic ban.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

For what it's worth I edit conflicted (x2) while making exactly the same edit as the above. You were blocked as as part of the ]]WP:GS/MJ|general sanctions surrounding Michael Jackson articles]] which are all explained on this talk page above. You were banned from editing any MJ related edits for 6 months and you managed to breach that within a week. If you continue to edit like this when the block is lifted you will most likely end up being blocked from editing indefinitely. Woody (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Yamla Can't you bother to read my query and respond? Are you just being a mall cop here? I didn't make any edits, I was asked to discuss my research on a talk page and then I was ignore. It seems there is an agenda here to not have credible research just opinions and self-sources matter to the "regulars". Bananasasas (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks are not tolerated here; see WP:NPA. Your block expires later this week, please don't make us extend it. You were topic-banned and violated the topic-ban. As indicated, I declined the unblock request on that basis. Once your block expires, you are free to contest your topic ban but until it is lifted, you are required to abide by it. --Yamla ([[User

talk:Yamla|talk]]) 17:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Yamla You came back and STILL REFUSE TO DISCUSS THE FACT THAT I DIDN'T EDIT ANY PAGE, you simply pretend like you have the ability to ban someone that calls you out for being incompetent. You should consider that you are wrong here and not double down again. Bananasasas (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Here, you were notified of your topic ban. You subsequently proceeded to violate that topic ban five times, by editing the page, Talk:Charles Thomson (journalist), as follows:, , , , . Note also that I didn't ban you or even block you; you can see your block log here. --Yamla (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Yamla Do you know what editing is? Did you think editing is the same as a discussion on a Talk Page? Did you notice the time stamps? You really shouldn't be playing mall cop here when you are aren't catching anything. That account is not related to Michael Jackson and the 6 month ban is RIDICULOUS. Bananasasas (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Is there a neutral party that can rule on this? Bananasasas (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * It's really simple. Every time you save a change, any change, to any Wikipedia page, you are editing. If you do this again, you'll be blocked, if not indefinitely for defying the ban probably at least for the period of the ban. If you insult anyone again, you'll likely be blocked. You've only made 72 edits in all and you think you can tell editors who have made over 100,000 they are wrong? Doug Weller  talk 13:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Bananasasas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 18:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)