User talk:BandBlue2020

BRING BACK Love (Live) on the inside. My work NEVER stays. You delete too much of it Damn you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-07-15T21:26:42 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Patti Scialfa has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Patti Scialfa was changed by BandBlue2020 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869975 on 2018-04-12T19:44:04+00:00.

June 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Wiggles discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Add US titles to the first column, release dates to second, but first you have to source this AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Shouldn't need sourcing. Sourcing only if I'm adding to the page of an individual album. All info is correct. Put IT back on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs)


 * Please ensure that you are including reliable sources when adding or changing information in articles. You may be sure that "all the info is correct", but readers must be able to verify the content you are adding and this is achieved through the inclusion of reliable sources.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to add or change content without including a reliable source for your edits, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Is Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster Pavilion ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paul_Is_Live check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paul_Is_Live?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Highway Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daughtry ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lost_Highway_Tour check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lost_Highway_Tour?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in American music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look Now ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_in_American_music check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_in_American_music?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Bring back Farewell Yellow Brick Road tour page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-09-04T00:02:12 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Some of it has been just corrections. Everything is true. LET ME EDIT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-09-07T03:20:46 (UTC)
 * As you went right back to adding unsourced content when your block expired you have been reblocked for 1 month. If you don't take this time to familiarize yourself with the requirement for reliable sources, your next block will likely be indefinite.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Anthony Field, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been blocked before; please stop or you'll probably be blocked again. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC) I did NOT vandalize. I corrected.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dick in a Box, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content. Timed blocks appear not to have impressed upon you the requirement to include reliable sources when adding or changing article data, therefore you are blocked indefinitely. Specifically, you are blocked until you are able to successfully appeal the block by demonstrating to reviewing admins that you understand and will abide by our policies regarding verifiability and sourcing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Unblock me.
My contributions are useful and I am not causing damage or disruption.

I have been providing useful content. I have not damaged or disrupted Wikipedia. I have not sockpuppeted. I have created new accounts because I have had MANY get shut down and therefore still want to be editing

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 03:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)