User talk:Bandagharka

Use english
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

You should use english on the english wikipedia. When you try to transliterate languages without using a standard method like you did here it's basically unreadable. Furthermore you should use english so editors who don't understand the language you are transliterating can read it and understand the discussion. Also don't assume you know what other editors' background is or make appeals on religous grounds. Wikipedia serves the public record, not the sensibilities of its editors--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 06:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

ANI Notice
Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Administrators&. Regards, --Profitoftruth85 (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

No legal threats
This is not permitted. If you ever threaten someone with court action again you will be indefinately blocked see WP:NLT Theresa Knott &#124; Sort that Knee! 14:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Photo for Ram Rahim Singh?
Greetings, I note that you have some interest in Ram Rahim Singh; do you know where we may be able to acquire a public-domain photograph of him to illustrate his bio article? Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

See . Materialscientist (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

See (search for CBI also observed that). Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Ram Rahim Singh and Dera Sacha Sauda
Greetings, from what I have seen of your edits, you are not editing with neutrality. I have not personally seen any vandalising edits about "crap" from Profitoftruth, but feel free to point them out to me if you have concerns. What I have seen is Profitoftruth and others fixing citations, adding more cited material, and removing sectarian puffery. Likewise, I see you reverting citation cleanup, inserting pro-DSS praise, removing any criticised info despite it being footnoted, and adding extremely confusing and un-encyclopedic talk of "criminal conspiracies", "certain people", etc. Dancing around issues, "some people" instead of "the Sikh community" is not neutrality, it is being coy. Fundamentally, I have not seen from you any tendency to support core Wikipedia principles of neutrality and footnoting. If you have material that is of equal reputability to the sources criticising DSS and RRS, bring it up on the Talk page and if it is indeed a good source it can be added as part of the "full story" showing multiple perspectives. Until you display proper neutrality, you can't expect neutral editors to sympathise with you. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I prefer not to use email for Wikipedia work; please instead just use my Talk page. Nothing is so secret that it can't just be posted there. MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)