User talk:Bandit901

Please be careful with your edits to the horse anatomy articles. Some are directly contradictory to the source material cited. Others may be correct, but cannot be verified because you have not provided a source. (see Verifiability) You need to add edit summaries so others can understand what you are doing, and it is better to question material with the  tag and discuss it on the talk page rather than to blank it or change it dramatically. Further, when a section does have a footnoted source, please do not attribute your edits to that source unless you have actually read it. I don't mean to be too harsh here, it looks like you are new to wikipedia, and sometimes written words come across in a tone different than was intended, but a couple of editors have had to spend a bit of time cleaning up your edits and I wanted to let you know why. (One of the others is a vet, by the way). Thanks Montanabw (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)