User talk:Bandyour

May 2019
Hello, I'm UA3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to UAE Pro-League have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. UA3 (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at UAE Pro-League, you may be blocked from editing. UA3 (talk) 00:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at UAE Pro-League, you may be blocked from editing. – bradv 🍁  03:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at UAE Pro-League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv 🍁  06:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at UAE Pro-League. You continued the same edits despite 's warning UA3 (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Final Warning
Desist in your disruptive editing on UAE Pro-League. If you disrupt the article again, you will be blocked. No further warnings on this subject will be forthcoming. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Ad orienton
Dear administrator Hi. Check the page: (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Gulf) It is all clear they are using the wrong words....and u block me because of changibg the name to the true name? Bandyour (talk) 09:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)