User talk:Banedroid

Satoshi Nakamoto
Dates and numbers were always important, they still are. Dates are key to the mystery behind true identity. It's not difficult, if you know the right information and where to look.

It would be great to hear from you if you think that you know. Banedroid (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

A ChatGPT query on Craig Wright
The following are some notable instances where Wright's claims have been widely criticized and debunked:

Failed Proof in 2016: In May 2016, Wright publicly claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto and provided supposed cryptographic proof by presenting technical evidence to a few media outlets. However, after closer examination by the cryptographic community, it was revealed that the evidence provided was either reused from the blockchain or simply did not prove Wright's claim.

Withdrawn Claims and Revisions: In subsequent attempts to prove his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, Wright has made various contradictory statements and revised his claims. In one instance, he stated that he would provide "extraordinary proof" but later decided not to do so, citing concerns about his own safety.

Lack of Convincing Technical Evidence: Despite his assertions, Wright has failed to provide a cryptographic signature using the private keys associated with the earliest mined Bitcoin blocks—something that would strongly support his claim. Such a signature would unequivocally prove his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, but Wright has not produced it.

Failed Legal Cases: Wright has initiated multiple legal actions against individuals and entities who disputed his claims. However, in these cases, he has been unable to convince the courts that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto. In some instances, the courts have dismissed his claims due to lack of evidence.

Criticism from Bitcoin Community: The wider Bitcoin and cryptocurrency community has largely been skeptical of Wright's claims. Prominent figures, developers, and researchers within the community have pointed out the inconsistencies, lack of technical knowledge demonstrated by Wright, and the absence of irrefutable evidence. Banedroid (talk) 10:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Discussions on article content and username concern
Hello and welcome. Your user talk page is not usually the best place to discuss changes to the content of particular articles, as it is unlikely other editors will ever notice it. Every article on Wikipedia has a "talk" page where editors can discuss proposed changes to article content. It is more likely that your discussions will be noticed if you post there instead (for example, Talk:Satoshi Nakamoto).

Also, your username appears to be the same as a website (https://banedroid.com/). Please be aware that Wikipedia's username policy explicitly states that accounts are for individuals only, and prohibits account names that represent companies, organizations, websites or groups of people. An acceptable compromise is to include a personal name as part of the username (e.g. "[first name]] at Banedroid"). Please submit a request to change your username, otherwise you risk your account being blocked from editing. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions regarding blockchain and cryptocurrency topics
--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

accounts
Are you the same user as operating the account ? You both are commenting on the same subject and appear quite similar. Your edits are becoming problematic at Talk:Satoshi Nakamoto and seem to be in violation of WP:NOTFORUM. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 05:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Jtbobwaysf I attended to my username issue by re-registering. In accordance with the rules, limited autobiographical information is allowed. WP:NOTCV DroidBane (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)