User talk:Bankmichael1

Hello Bankmichael1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. HumphreyW (talk) 08:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Dear Editor. Could you please help me to understand what I am supposed to do in order to post this reference? The material in the article which I would like to add to the references deals with the information theory problems in the indirect manner. Basically, it deals with art works human perception. This issue has become very important for communication system now. One of the main problems here is the maximum reduction of redundancy without sacrificing signal quality. This article helps to find new opportunities in this area. Please note that half of the article is photos and art works reproductions, so it cannot be part of the basic Wikipedia material. I worked on this problem over 40 years. I have published several articles. One of them was published in Germany commissioned by the institute IRT in Munich (see M. Bank „Bearbeitung der schallinformation im menschlichen gehorsystem und in technischen anlagen Rundfunktechnischen Mittelungen, (2), 1992 (53-65)). I gave talks on these issues material at several conferences, including plenary sessions (see 	Perception redundancy theory and technical compression systems	Proc. 2009 Int;l. Conf. on Image Processing, Computer Vision, and 	Pattern Recognition (IPCV 2009)	Hamid R. Arabnia, Gerald Schaefer (eds.) Vol.2	The 2009 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and	Applied Computing (WORLDCOMP '09)	Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 13-16 July 2009 [invited]). I have never received an objection. I will really appreciate your help in posting this material in Wikipedia.


 * Our policies and guidelines make it very clear that adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Our guideline on adding external links make it very clear that a link is not appropriate when it does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a quality article. More specifically, any links added mainly to promote a source is considered spamming. Furthermore, you do have a conflict of interest by adding your own material to Wikipedia, an action that is in direct contradiction with its stated goal of providing a neutral, reliably sourced presentation of a topic. Most importantly though, you are adding links to material that is only indirectly related to the article's subject, which you even admit yourself. However important you may think your work is, it does nothing to deepen the technical understanding of information theory, and you are evading the opinion of other editors, who so far have decided that your link is not appropriate. These guidelines have been repeatedly pointed out to you, and you have always ignored them. Nageh (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)