User talk:Banquer

December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

CDS City
Hey I think we're on the same side here. But we should probably avoid a noticeable "we CDS dealers are good as gold!" slant, as introduced by some of your qualifiers that seemed to be more arguing a pro CDS POV than reporting in an encyclopaedic neutral tone. Folk already hostile will sense a cover up. Media that reported $400 bn payable on Lehman wernt mistaken,  just only giving half the story if they didn’t also  mention the smooth unwinding of positions. You were right to mention the netting process. Ive left most of your change but also removed some of the technical stuff. It would be good if at least the history section could remain intelligible to the general reader – theres a lot of traffic going to that page and we’re helping to reduce anxiety only if the info we provide is clear and accessible. Hope this is okay. FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)