User talk:Bapinghosh/Archives/2021

Welcome!
Hello, Bapinghosh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fire Ball Securitas And Consultants, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fire Ball Securitas And Consultants


A tag has been placed on Fire Ball Securitas And Consultants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manan Shah (Business Person)


A tag has been placed on Manan Shah (Business Person), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manan Shah (Ethical Hacker). (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 17:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello sir ,I didn't knew Manan shah is the same person so I created Manan Shah (Buisness Person). Thank you for your information. Now I am going to submit a request to create Manan Shah right now which is salted. Thanks again. Bapinghosh (talk) 08:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Loka (singer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Loka (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Arnab Bhattacharya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnab Bhattacharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arnab Bhattacharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMySon (talk) 03:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranu Mondal (August 1)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ranu_Mondal Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No change in notability since previous reject or Articles for deletion/Ranu Mondal

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 09:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey if you read carefully then you can clearly see that she sang 3 songs. And she is notable enough. She also has coverage from reliable sources such as The Hindu, The Hindu, The Financial Express. And the subject is clearly meeting WP:GNG. Bapinghosh (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * How are the songs notable? Have they charted anywhere? Are they top selling albums? See WP:MUSICBIO AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 10:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * , see Articles for deletion/Ranu Mondal. Back then she was famous for one event where a director promoted her. Has she become a lot more notable since then? The draft does not explain any of this. It just lists three songs.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 10:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , this should redirect to Teri Meri Kahani (song) as the details behind the single are there. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 10:24, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

but the subject is meeting WP:GNG Bapinghosh (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Per WP:MUSICBIO #10 "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications)." She should redirect to Teri Meri Kahani (song), which covers her background bio. Or she should redirect to Happy Hardy and Heer. If she's done more notable songs and soundtracks since that film, then please bring that up along with the news sources.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 11:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you for the information. Bapinghosh (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Prakriti Nautiyal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Prakriti Nautiyal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It looks like you are connected with the subject and repeatedly trying to re-create the article after taking some financial stake. Now it needs to submit through Draft process. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 08:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

the page was last deleted 20 october 2019. And it was extend confirm protection. I got some news coverages and I just started editing. And the subject meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. According to rules the subject should stay on to the article space. And you if you think the article should not stay on article space then select the article for AFD. Bapinghosh (talk) 08:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Why you have so keen interest in this particular subject? If you have any connection with the subject, and took any financial stake, Please disclose it on your user page.DMySon (talk) 08:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

I am not keen interest. I just told that the subject is meeting GNG, So if the subject should stay according to rule the keep it. Otherwise delete it. I don't have problem, If it get deleted. Bapinghosh (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello Bapinghosh. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Prakriti Nautiyal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bapinghosh. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DMySon (talk) 08:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi i am not connected to the subject and i dont have any COI about the subject. And the article was extend confirm protection till 20 October 2019. So when i saw the reason was G6, R2, RD1 only then I stared editing cause the subject was clearly meeting WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.And still the article is meeting GNG and NACTOT. Bapinghosh (talk) 08:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Remove wrong information
Wrestler Priya Malik has never won a gold medal at 2020 Tokyo Olympics. See proofs 42.110.207.131 (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please always verify facts before editing. Don't peddle fake news. 42.110.207.131 (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The page contains false information as per above in the latest version. Please help to rectify if the editor is inactive. Thank you. 42.110.207.131 (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Bapinghosh, Please do not put the wrong information as you did in Priya Malik wiki page. She never won Gold in 2020 Summer Olympics, in-fact she won Gold in 2021 World Cadet Wrestling Championship in Hungary. DMySon (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello and  i didn't put any wrong information. And neither i wrote about 2020 summer Olympics on Priya Malik. I added these awards Gold Medal at Khelo India (2019), Gold Medal at Patna National Cadet Championship (2019), Gold Medal at School Games (2020), Gold Medal at World Cadet Wrestling Championship (2021). So please do check edit history before commenting about something. Thanks Bapinghosh (talk) 12:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Bapinghosh, you are trying to manipulate us. Wikipedia is not a place for testing where you can add any non factual information. Please check this version which was published by you. DMySon (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * first of all I am not trying to manipulating you, the edit is not done by me. The edit has done by a ip user see here Bapinghosh (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * i request you to check edit history. You will understand which information I added. Hope you will check. Bapinghosh (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, i agreed. The changes are done by an ip address but the question is; why you didn't oppose/undo those edits, while you are are aware of it? DMySon (talk) 01:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I was not aware of it. If I was aware of it than I would have done the undo. Bapinghosh (talk)  07:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Prajna Dutta, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Bapinghosh, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2409:4061:2C86:ED7B:F1C7:D63E:2EF8:396E (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Prajna Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. 2409:4061:2C19:9EE0:804B:51A:8761:321D (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You are strongly suspected to have been WP:PAID by whose article was repeatedly declined and deleted. See proof. You avoided WP:AFC and moved to main-space to avoid WP:SCRUTINY. See this. Please do not remove maintenance tags. 2409:4061:2C19:9EE0:804B:51A:8761:321D (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely i am not paid for creating Prajna Dutta. By the way thank you for your concern. Bapinghosh (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you for notifying me. Bapinghosh (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Loka (singer)
Hello, Bapinghosh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Loka (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanghasri Sinha Mitra


The article Sanghasri Sinha Mitra has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable actor. Notability tag placed. Fails WP:NACTOR. Bit-part actor."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  scope_creep Talk  19:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:DasSoumik&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/DasSoumik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. clpo13(talk) 22:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Loka (singer)


Hello, Bapinghosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Loka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Priya Malik


A tag has been placed on Priya Malik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jagrantv.com/en-show/priya-malik-biography-know-her-age-early-life-indian-wrestler-records-awards-and-gold-medals-rc1021120. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)