User talk:Baptizedsaint

November 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Antonio Vivaldi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antonio Vivaldi, you may be blocked from editing. Cjse23 (talk) 09:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Antonio Vivaldi. Materialscientist (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Vivaldi
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - SchroCat (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Baptizedsaint! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing!

I see that nobody greeted you here yet, sorry about that. Please read a bit before editing more. Edit summaries such as "What suits me and easy to understand" reveal that you have not yet grasped that Wikipedia is for many readers, not just you. Happy editing, but please keep the interests of others in mind and go about changes carefully. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for persistent removal of content from Antonio Vivaldi, after multiple people asked you to stop. If you think you deserve an unblock and a chance to edit constructively, follow the directions on the block page to ask for an unblock. Antandrus (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)