User talk:Bar Fruit

Hello Wikipedia people! I have been blocked from editing and it is unclear why. I made a single edit to the Gulfstream Park page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulfstream_Park which is a boastful page that glorifies horse racing. I file public records requests with the FL Department of Professional Business Regulations, and receive death confirmations of thoroughbred racehorses. In 2019 Gulfstream Park killed 58 thoroughbred horses, confirmed from a government run website. Removing this information is not only a violation of freedom of speech, but is suppressing the truth from your millions of users. Wikipedia has been a trusted source of information for me for many years and I have made donations to you.

Where I file my public records requests: http://www.myfloridalicense.com/contactus/

I have uploaded two death confirmations for your review.

Please remove your block so that I can continue speaking the truth. Thank you kindly.

Bar Fruit (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Bar Fruit Bar Fruit (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Dylass, you are harassing me by repeatedly removing my legitimate content. I have provided references as you have requested. I have provided FL state law regarding public records request and the government run website that issues racetracks their license. I have documentation from this licensing board (examples that you keep deleting) that support what I am attempting to convey, which is the truth. In 2019, 58 thoroughbreds were euthanized on this track. What is your motivation for repeatedly suppressing this information from your readers? I displayed it in matter-of-fact fashion. I keep editing the content to adhere to what I think is Wikipedia appropriate. YOU are the one being disruptive, not me. This page has become a FREE ADVERTISEMENT for Gulfstream Park. Is that what Wikipedia is all about? Bar Fruit (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Bar Fruit, I'm not saying that your original research isn't legitimate, I'm saying that original research isn't allowed on Wikipedia full stop. You have not provided references which verify the added material, you have provided inline citations which verify statutes, not how many horse deaths that have occurred at this venue. The burden to verify this information is with you. You seem to be refusing to get the point. I suggest you comment on the disccusion I have started about your conduct. Also, your last edit was reverted by another editor, not me. Dylsss (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Adding content which clearly violates a Wikipedia policy does not make a page sound less like an advertisement, it makes the page of lower quality. Dylsss (talk) 17:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Dylsss. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gulfstream Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Dylsss (talk) 20:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gulfstream Park. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  20:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.   Dylsss (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.   Dylsss (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gulfstream Park.   Dylsss (talk) 20:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dylsss (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)