User talk:Baratta0810

Welcome!
Hello, Baratta0810, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Scott Cullather, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Triplestop (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Cullather


A tag has been placed on Scott Cullather, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Triplestop (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of InVNT


A tag has been placed on InVNT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for admitting that you are a hired contractor "posting articles according to someone else's instructions". Your employers should have told you that this is not permitted on Wikipedia - see WP:Conflict of interest and the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, particularly the section "Paid contract editors" under Types of COI. That guideline sets out rules of engagement for editors with a COI; but the group of paid editors identified by the name "Morning277" after one of their earlier accounts have chosen to avoid disclosure and try to fly under the radar by creating new accounts for every client. More than 300 such accounts have been identified so far. This sort of thing is a very serious threat to the integrity of Wikipedia, and accordingly the Morning277 group have been formally banned, which entails automatic deletion of all their articles.

I have blocked your account as a "sockpuppet" of Morning277, because the policy on WP:Sockpuppetry provides that "when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets"; since your chosen subjects are articles formerly created by Morning277 socks, you are identified with that group. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)