User talk:Barbaric

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Thulium 20:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Neutral point of view
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Asterion talk 09:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, I notice a few weeks a go you made an edit to TGBBQ (the great big british quiz) therefore, I presume you are a fan. Please help me in dealing eith user Mel Etitis in convincing him Ronan McKenna is still working at TGBBQ and Ann Fowler has left. This guy just ain't havin it. Please write back, we're right, yeah?

Neutral point of view and Citing sources
I notice that you continually make changes to articles that violate WP:NPOV, and that you do not reference any sources for your changes as required by WP:REF. Note that just because you "know something to be true" doesn't mean you can change an article to reflect that. You must back up your change with reference to a credible and reliable source. You often tag your changes with words such as "the whole world knows...". If this is true, then finding reliable sources should be easy.

You also frequently change names in violation of Naming Conventions for Articles and Naming Conventions for People and Places.

Choosing half a dozen of your changes at random, every one was almost immediately reverted as vandalism by other editors. If you want your contribution to Wikipedia to be successful, you would do well to adhere more closely to the policies and guidelines. In particular, given the controversial nature of many of your changes, you should discuss the changes you wish to make on the discussion page of the article before editing the article itself. CaughtLBW 14:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Jordovan
Sorry, I've been really busy this week. I'll look into it as soon as I get a chance. Davu.leon 00:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Hate speech
In reference to this edit, I have to tell you about Wikipedia's policy on hate speech, racist and nationalist comments, as well as spreading anti-Serb sentiment, which makes it clear that comments like those are not welcome here and are very offensive and damaging to our community. "i HATE every Serb on the planet", while I can't stop you from hating every Serb on the planet, I can assure you that comments like that will not be tolerated on Wikipedia. This is not a forum and noone cares how you personally feel towards any nation on Earth. Thank you, --  G OD OF  J USTICE 03:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Barbaric, bear in mind that here in Wikipedia there is a kind of "Serb batallion" that is one of the most well-coordinated "political edition forces" here. Contrary to that we see in rthe press all around the world, here in Wikipedia you "learn" that "the Serbs were the innocent victims of Ustasha, Muslim Bosnian, Albanian and American attacks, and Milosevic, Mladic and Arkan were just aptriots fighting for the sons of the Serb Nation. Amen."


 * Any kind of people here that try to change this "npov views" of the "srpska pravda" in Yugoslav-related articles gets an automatic label of "Serbophobic"and is persecutted until it quits editing Yugoslav articles or quit Wikipedia altogether.


 * This Orthodox Christian falange doesn't admit the existence of "infidels" that are in favor of the independence of Kosova.

blocked for hoax creation and sockpuppeting
For creation of a propaganda hoax article at, and likely sockpuppeting using , I am blocking you indefinitely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Barakovo
An editor has nominated Barakovo, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)