User talk:Barbula

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article National Organization for Women, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jon Erpenbach, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.The Sartorialist (talk) 06:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

December 2012
Your recent editing history at United States pro-life movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Regina Benjamin. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RolandR (talk) 20:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

November 2015
Hi, I've just looked up judgement/judgment in the OED (2nd ed) ant the latter form is recorded simply as a variant of the former spelling. If you have a good reason to dispute this then please answer here; I shall be watching it for a while. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

I just saw this! Actually, this is a classic American vs. British difference. In the USA we spell it judgment; it's judgement in England. So the key is consistency. So if the article is from a British perspective/author, British spelling and words should be used throughout; the same if from an American one. Make sense?