User talk:Barce

Spinoza's Coat VfD
Hey Barce, Please check up on the discussion on Votes for deletion/Spinoza's Coat. Thanks! --Improv 16:06, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Poetics
Hi Barce,

I just left some talk on the poetics page you started--I want to know if there are objections to my renaming the page "Aristotle's Poetics" or variant. I want to start a "poetics" entry and it seems to me that "Aristotle's Poetics" / "Poetics" is a more sensible arrangement than "Poetics" / "Poetics (branch of knowledge)." A compromise might be "Poetics (Aristotle) / Poetics (Theory)," but I don't think this is quite right, since the Poetics is the founding subset of poetics. What do you think? Cyrusc 01:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi again,

I redirected your poetics link on your user page so that it points to the article you started. I hope this is all right--I felt a little funny changing your user page, but I felt funnier leaving the link there when it redirected to the wrong article. See Talk:Poetics (Aristotle)

Best,

Cyrus

Problems with upload of Image:Dogster logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Dogster logo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Technoromanticism (disambiguation)


The article Technoromanticism (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * disambiguation page not needed - hatnote on Technoromanticism does the job

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Vikings
Hi there.

About your recent edit here on the page Vikings. You can read more about Danevirke and the year of 1864 on the page about this defence structure. The article wiki-links to this topic. Anyway a good source in English would be great, and I could not even find that on the Danevirke page or the Evacuation of Dannevirke in 1864 even. That is pretty bad. I hope I can dig something up in the near future and you are welcome too :-) RhinoMind (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)