User talk:BarcelonaFan995

JANUARY 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to ATK Mohun Bagan FC, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinan 2004 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

ATK Mohun Bagan
You should make your case on the article talk page. GiantSnowman 19:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

WP:CANVASS
Hello BarcelonaFan995, make yourself assure that you have gone through WP:CANVASS and specially, Campaining and understand the guidelines. It's quite evident that you are advertising similar pamphlet to multiple editors whose stand in last participation in page move discussions are more or less similar. Drat8sub (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism of Mohun Bagan AC Page
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IAmPushpak (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Berrely. I noticed that in this edit to ATK Mohun Bagan FC, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ATK Mohun Bagan FC; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Kichu🐘 Discuss 00:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at ATK Mohun Bagan FC. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

And you are now edit-warring again rather than waiting for the talk page discussion to reach a conclusion. You may be right, but such edit-warring will not prove you right. Just stop editing the article and discuss the issue in an adult way on the talk page. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)